Structural crown properties of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica [L.]) in mixed versus pure stands revealed by terrestrial laser scanning

How tree morphology develops in mixed-species stands is essential for understanding and modelling mixed-stand dynamics. However, research so far focused on the morphological variation between tree species and neglected the variation within a species depending on intra- and interspecific competition. Our study, in contrast, addresses crown properties of nine mature Norway spruces (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) of a pure stand and compares them with ten spruces growing in mixture with European beech (Fagus sylvatica [L.]). The same was done with 11 pure stand beeches and 12 beeches growing in mixture with spruce. Through application of a terrestrial laser scanner and a new skeletonization approach, we deal with both species’-specific morphological traits such as branch angle, branch length, branch bending, crown volume and space occupation of branches within the crown, some of which were hardly accessible so far. Special attention is paid to distinct differences between trees growing in mixed and pure stands: for spruce, our study reveals significantly longer branches and greater crown volumes in the mixed stand when compared to the pure stand. In case of European beech, individuals growing in mixture show flatter branch angles, more distinct ramification, greater crown volumes and a lower share of a single branch’s space occupation in the total crown volume. The results show that the presented methods yield detailed information on the morphological traits analyzed in this study and that interspecific competition on its own may have a significant impact on crown structures. Implications for production ecology and stand dynamics of mixed-species forests are discussed.

[1]  R. Macarthur,et al.  On Bird Species Diversity , 1961 .

[2]  J. Landsberg Crop physiology of forest trees , 1987 .

[3]  Bruce J. Zobel,et al.  Wood Variation: Its Causes and Control , 1989 .

[4]  M. Rutzinger,et al.  COMPARISON OF BRANCH EXTRACTION FOR DECIDUOUS SINGLE TREES IN LEAF-ON AND LEAF-OFF CONDITIONS – AN EIGENVECTOR BASED APPROACH FOR TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING POINT CLOUDS , 2012 .

[5]  H. Pretzsch Species-specific allometric scaling under self-thinning: evidence from long-term plots in forest stands , 2005, Oecologia.

[6]  V. Grimm,et al.  Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures , 2004 .

[7]  F. A. Bazzaz,et al.  Plant Species Diversity in Old‐Field Successional Ecosystems in Southern Illinois , 1975 .

[8]  Gustav Fischer,et al.  Die Hydratur der Pflanze und ihre physiologisch-ökologische Bedeutung (Untersuchungen über den osmotischen Wert) , 2005, Protoplasma.

[9]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Proceedings of the 20th Python in Science Conference 2021 (SciPy 2021), Virtual Conference, July 12 - July 18, 2021 , 2008, SciPy.

[10]  S. Seifert,et al.  Beitrag des terrestrischen Laserscannings zur Erfassung der Struktur von Baumkronen | Application of terrestrial laser scanning for measuring tree crown structures , 2011 .

[11]  Alexander Bucksch,et al.  Revealing the skeleton from imperfect point clouds , 2011 .

[12]  George Vosselman,et al.  Airborne and terrestrial laser scanning , 2011, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[13]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Forest Dynamics, Growth and Yield: From Measurement to Model , 2009 .

[14]  J. Weitz,et al.  The metabolic theory of ecology: prospects and challenges for plant biology. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[15]  A. Zingg,et al.  Comparison between the productivity of pure and mixed stands of Norway spruce and European beech along an ecological gradient , 2010, Annals of Forest Science.

[16]  S. Bell,et al.  Habitat Structure , 1991, Population and Community Biology Series.

[17]  Prabhu Ramachandran,et al.  Mayavi: Making 3D Data Visualization Reusable , 2008 .

[18]  E. Priesack,et al.  The plant's capacity in regulating resource demand. , 2005, Plant biology.

[19]  N. Coops,et al.  Comparing canopy metrics derived from terrestrial and airborne laser scanning in a Douglas-fir dominated forest stand , 2010, Trees.

[20]  N. Coops,et al.  Assessment of standing wood and fiber quality using ground and airborne laser scanning: A review , 2011 .

[21]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Evidence of variant intra- and interspecific scaling of tree crown structure and relevance for allometric theory , 2012, Oecologia.

[22]  A. Bolte,et al.  Interspecific competition impacts on the morphology and distribution of fine roots in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) , 2006, European Journal of Forest Research.

[23]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Crown allometry and growing space efficiency of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in pure and mixed stands. , 2005, Plant biology.

[24]  E. Assmann,et al.  The Principles of Forest Yield Study: Studies in the Organic Production, Structure, Increment and Yield of Forest Stands , 2013 .

[25]  P. Reich,et al.  Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[26]  Rainer Matyssek,et al.  Quantifying Competitiveness in Woody Plants , 2002 .

[27]  U. Lüttge,et al.  Space as a Resource , 2010 .

[28]  Alexander Bucksch,et al.  SkelTre - Robust skeleton extraction from imperfect point clouds , 2010, Vis. Comput..

[29]  J. Lawton Plant Architecture and the Diversity of Phytophagous Insects , 1983 .

[30]  T. Seifert Integration von Holzqualität und Holzsortierung in behandlungssensitive Waldwachstumsmodelle , 2003 .

[31]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Thinking about efficiency of resource use in forests , 2004 .

[32]  Boris Zeide,et al.  Fractal analysis of foliage distribution in loblolly pine crowns , 1998 .

[33]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Using terrestrial laser scanner for estimating leaf areas of individual trees in a conifer forest , 2010, Trees.

[34]  Nellie Clarke Brown Trees , 1896, Savage Dreams.

[35]  Drew W. Purves,et al.  Crown Plasticity and Competition for Canopy Space: A New Spatially Implicit Model Parameterized for 250 North American Tree Species , 2007, PloS one.

[36]  E. Assmann Waldertragskunde : organische Produktion, Struktur, Zuwachs und Ertrag von Waldbeständen , 1961 .

[37]  Professor Dr. Roelof A. A. Oldeman,et al.  Forests: Elements of Silvology , 1990, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[38]  H. Pretzsch,et al.  Transgressive overyielding in mixed compared with pure stands of Norway spruce and European beech in Central Europe: evidence on stand level and explanation on individual tree level , 2009, European Journal of Forest Research.

[39]  James H. Brown,et al.  Allometric scaling of plant energetics and population density , 1998, Nature.

[40]  A. Nicotra,et al.  Aboveground interactions and productivity in mixed-species plantations of Acacia mearnsii and Eucalyptus globulus , 2004 .

[41]  Richard A. Fournier,et al.  An architectural model of trees to estimate forest structural attributes using terrestrial LiDAR , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[42]  Herbert Edelsbrunner,et al.  Three-dimensional alpha shapes , 1992, VVS.

[43]  J. Bauhus,et al.  The influence of mixed tree plantations on the nutrition of individual species: a review. , 2010, Tree physiology.

[44]  Geoffrey B. West,et al.  A general quantitative theory of forest structure and dynamics , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Earl D. McCoy,et al.  Habitat Structure: The Evolution and Diversification of a Complex Topic , 1991 .

[46]  Dan Binkley,et al.  Light absorption and use efficiency in forests: Why patterns differ for trees and stands , 2013 .

[47]  David M. Mount,et al.  It's okay to be skinny, if your friends are fat , 1999 .

[48]  Lars Wilhelmsson,et al.  Models for Predicting Wood Properties in Stems of Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris in Sweden , 2002 .