Student vs. Search Engine: Undergraduates Rank Results for Relevance
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Greg R. Notess. Rising relevance in search engines , 1999 .
[2] Carol Collier Kuhlthau,et al. A Principle of Uncertainty for Information seeking , 1993, J. Documentation.
[3] L BarryCarol. User-defined relevance criteria , 1994 .
[4] Michael D. Gordon,et al. Finding Information on the World Wide Web: The Retrieval Effectiveness of Search Engines , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..
[5] Owen Williams,et al. Search Engine Watch , 2005 .
[6] C. Lee Giles,et al. Accessibility of information on the Web , 2000, INTL.
[7] S. P. Harter. Psychological relevance and information science , 1992 .
[8] Monika Henzinger,et al. Analysis of a very large web search engine query log , 1999, SIGF.
[9] Michael B. Eisenberg,et al. A re-examination of relevance: toward a dynamic, situational definition , 1990, Inf. Process. Manag..
[10] Amanda Spink,et al. Searching heterogeneous collections on the Web: behaviour of Excite users , 1998, Inf. Res..
[11] Kurt I. Munson. Internet Search Engines , 2000 .
[12] Kyung-Sun Kim,et al. Cognitive style and on-line database search experience as predictors of Web search performance , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[13] Carol L. Barry. User-defined relevance criteria: an exploratory study , 1994 .
[14] Stephen P. Harter,et al. Variations in Relevance Assessments and the Measurement of Retrieval Effectiveness , 1996, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[15] Stuart I. Feldman. Web search services in 1998: Trends and challenges , 1998 .
[16] T. Park. The Nature of Relevance in Information Retrieval: An Empirical Study , 1993, The Library Quarterly.
[17] Peggy Zorn. Advanced Web Searching: Tricks of the Trade. , 1996 .
[18] Louise T. Su. The Relevance of Recall and Precision in User Evaluation , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[19] Amanda Spink,et al. Searching the Web: the public and their queries , 2001 .
[20] Joseph W. Janes,et al. Other People's Judgments: A Comparison of Users' and Others' Judgments of Document Relevance, Topicality, and Utility , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[21] Andrew Kingoff. Comparing Internet Search Engines , 1997, Computer.
[22] Tefko Saracevic,et al. RELEVANCE: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[23] Candy Schwartz,et al. Web Search Engines , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[24] Bernard J. Jansen,et al. A review of web searching studies and a framework for future research , 2001 .
[25] Thomas J. Froehlich,et al. Relevance reconsidered—towards an agenda for the 21st century: introduction to special topic issue on relevance research , 1994 .
[26] Lawrence M. Rudner,et al. Quality of Researchers' Searches of the ERIC Database , 1999 .
[27] Stefano Mizzaro. Relevance: the whole history , 1997 .
[28] Taemin Kim Park,et al. Toward a Theory of User-Based Relevance: A Call for a New Paradigm of Inquiry , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[29] Michael B. Eisenberg. Measuring relevance judgments , 1988, Inf. Process. Manag..
[30] Ran Hock. How to do field searching in Web search engines: a field trip , 1998 .
[31] J. Janes. Other people's judgments: a comparison of users' and others' judgments of document relevance, topicality, and utility , 1994 .
[32] Stephen P. Harter,et al. Psychological Relevance and Information Science , 1992, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[33] Alfred Glossbrenner,et al. Search engines for the World Wide Web , 1997 .
[34] Susan Feldman,et al. The Internet Search-Off. , 1998 .
[35] Iwan G. J. H. Wopereis,et al. Differences between novice and experienced users in searching information on the World Wide Web , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[36] Xiaoying Dong,et al. SEARCH ENGINES ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB AND INFORMATION RETRIEVAL FROM THE INTERNET: A REVIEW AND EVALUATION , 1997 .
[37] Taemin Kim Park. Toward a theory of user-based relevance: a call for a new paradigm of inquiry , 1994 .
[38] Tefko Saracevic. Information Science , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..