A Selective Feature Information Approach for Iris Image-Quality Measure

Poor quality images can significantly affect the accuracy of iris-recognition systems because they do not have enough feature information. However, existing quality measures have focused on parameters or factors other than feature information. The quality of feature available for measure is a combination of the distinctiveness of the iris region and the amount of iris region available. Some irises may only have a small area of changing patterns. Due to this, the proposed approach automatically selects the portions of the iris with the most distinguishable changing patterns to measure the feature information. The combination of occlusion and dilation determines the amount of iris region available and is considered in the proposed quality measure. The quality score is the fused result of the feature information score, the occlusion score, and the dilation score. The relationship between the quality score and recognition accuracy is evaluated using 2-D Gabor and 1-D Log-Gabor wavelet approaches and validated using a diverse data set. In addition, the proposed method is compared with the convolution matrix, spectrum energy, and Mexican hat wavelet methods. These three methods represent a variety of approaches for iris-quality measure. The experimental results show that the proposed quality score is highly correlated with the recognition accuracy and is capable of predicting the recognition results.

[1]  Chein-I. Chang,et al.  New Hyperspectral Discrimination Measure for Spectral Characterization , 2004 .

[2]  Natalia A. Schmid,et al.  Image quality assessment for iris biometric , 2006, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[3]  Yuanning Liu,et al.  A quality evaluation method of iris images sequence based on wavelet coefficients in "region of interest" , 2004, The Fourth International Conference onComputer and Information Technology, 2004. CIT '04..

[4]  Thad Welch,et al.  Use of one-dimensional iris signatures to rank iris pattern similarities , 2006 .

[5]  D. M. Etter,et al.  Analysis of partial iris recognition , 2005, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[6]  Yingzi Du,et al.  Performance analysis and parameter optimization for iris recognition using Log-Gabor wavelet , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[7]  John Daugman,et al.  How iris recognition works , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[8]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Localized Iris Image Quality Using 2-D Wavelets , 2006, ICB.

[9]  Hsuan Ren,et al.  New hyperspectral discrimination measure for spectral similarity , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[10]  James R. Matey,et al.  Iris on the Move: Acquisition of Images for Iris Recognition in Less Constrained Environments , 2006, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  Yingzi Du,et al.  Feature information based quality measure for iris recognition , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[12]  Dexin Zhang,et al.  Personal Identification Based on Iris Texture Analysis , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  Patrick J. Flynn,et al.  Comments on the CASIA version 1.0 Iris Data Set , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[14]  Yingzi Du,et al.  Information distance-based selective feature clarity measure for iris recognition , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[15]  Patrick J. Flynn,et al.  Image understanding for iris biometrics: A survey , 2008, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[16]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[17]  Libor Masek,et al.  MATLAB Source Code for a Biometric Identification System Based on Iris Patterns , 2003 .

[18]  Yingzi Du,et al.  Analysis of partial iris recognition using a 1D approach , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..