Maximum efficiency control strategy of PM traction machine drives in GM hybrid and electric vehicles

This work investigates maximum efficiency control strategies of permanent magnet (PM) traction machine drives that are adopted in General Motors (GM) hybrid and electric vehicles. First, three different current vector control techniques, Maximum Torque Per Ampere (MTPA), Maximum Torque Per Motor Loss (MTPML), and Maximum Torque Per System Loss (MTPSL), are presented to identify the most attractive control strategy for a PM traction machine drive that is being used in a production vehicle. This comparison will show the drive system efficiency and the current vector trajectory for the three different control strategies, providing valuable experimental data to help researchers optimize the operating point efficiency. In addition, a six-step mode of inverter control is evaluated to enhance the drive efficiency and performance under the dc bus voltage constraint in the flux weakening region. Extensive experimental tests on the PM traction machine drive have been performed, aiming to evaluate and identify the most attractive control strategy that can maximize the drive efficiency. The test results presented in this paper confirm that the maximum efficiency operation of the experimental machine drive was achieved by a combination of MTPL control and six-step mode operation. In order to fully comprehend the optimal system efficiency, results of a broader investigation of the drive system losses such as the experimental system loss breakdown and the modeling of inverter losses are also included.

[1]  Seung-Ki Sul,et al.  Minimum-loss strategy for three-phase PWM rectifier , 1999, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[2]  Hideo Nakai,et al.  Development and testing of the torque control for the permanent-magnet synchronous motor , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[3]  Peter J. Savagian,et al.  Design and Performance of Electrical Propulsion System of Extended Range Electric Vehicle (EREV) Chevrolet Volt , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[4]  Peter J. Savagian,et al.  Electric Motor Design of General Motors’ Chevrolet Bolt Electric Vehicle , 2016 .

[5]  T.M. Jahns,et al.  Modified Vector Control Algorithm for Increasing Partial-Load Efficiency of Fractional-Slot Concentrated-Winding Surface PM Machines , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[6]  Seung-Ki Sul,et al.  Online Minimum-Copper-Loss Control of an Interior Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Machine for Automotive Applications , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[7]  Seung-Ki Sul,et al.  Six-Step Operation of PMSM With Instantaneous Current Control , 2014 .

[8]  Sinisa Jurkovic,et al.  Propulsion System Design of a Battery Electric Vehicle , 2014, IEEE Electrification Magazine.

[9]  Dianguo Xu,et al.  Maximum Efficiency Per Ampere Control of Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Machines , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[10]  Peter J. Savagian,et al.  Electric traction motors for Cadillac CT6 plugin hybrid-electric vehicle , 2016, 2016 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE).

[11]  Mohammad Anwar,et al.  Compact and high power inverter for the Cadillac CT6 rear wheel drive PHEV , 2016, 2016 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE).

[12]  Z. Zhu,et al.  Iron loss in permanent-magnet brushless AC machines under maximum torque per ampere and flux weakening control , 2002 .

[13]  Ahmet M. Hava,et al.  Simple Analytical and Graphical Methods for Carrier-Based PWM-VSI Drives , 1999 .