Acute effects of 50 Hz, 100 microT magnetic field exposure on visual duration discrimination at two different times of the day.

A two-alternative, forced-choice visual duration discrimination task was used to examine the effect of an intermittent, 50 Hz, 100 microT magnetic field on accuracy at two different times of the day. A total of 59 female and 40 male subjects with an age range of 18 to 46 years were studied under both field-exposed and sham-exposed conditions. The subject's task was to decide which of two sequentially presented light flashes had the longer duration, percentage correct being the measure of performance. The data were gathered under double-blind conditions with sham and real exposure counterbalanced. Exposure to the magnetic field produced a small improvement in accuracy but only at the most difficult level of the task, with female subjects showing a larger improvement than males. The time of day at which the study was run had no effect on performance. Despite the relatively large number of subjects used and a relaxed alpha level (P = .3), the statistical power of the test to detect the observed effect was still only 0.71.

[1]  J. Podd,et al.  Acute effects of 50 Hz magnetic field exposure on human visual task and cardiovascular performance. , 1996, Bioelectromagnetics.

[2]  W. Hager,et al.  Tables and Procedures for the Determination of Power and Sample Sizes in Univariate and Multivariate Analyses of Variance and Regression , 1986 .

[3]  J. Arendt,et al.  Biological Rhythms in Clinical Practice , 1990 .

[4]  L. Johnson,et al.  Biological rhythms, sleep and shift work , 1981 .

[5]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  GPOWER: A general power analysis program , 1996 .

[6]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings , 1991 .

[7]  F. Schmidt.  Statistical Significance Testing and Cumulative Knowledge in Psychology: Implications for Training of Researchers , 1996 .

[8]  A. Winfree.  Book reviewThe clocks that time us : Martin Moore-Ede, Frank Sulzman, and Charles Fuller Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1982, 448 pp., $25.00 , 1983 .

[9]  J. Horne,et al.  A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. , 1976, International journal of chronobiology.

[10]  Carlla S. Smith,et al.  Evaluation of three circadian rhythm questionnaires with suggestions for an improved measure of morningness. , 1989, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  W P Colquhoun,et al.  Experimental studies of shift-work I: A comparison of 'rotating' and 'stabilized' 4-hour shift systems. , 1968, Ergonomics.

[13]  J. Podd,et al.  Do ELF magnetic fields affect human reaction time? , 1995, Bioelectromagnetics.

[14]  H D Cohen,et al.  A replication study of human exposure to 60-Hz fields: effects on neurobehavioral measures. , 1992, Bioelectromagnetics.

[15]  C J Whittington,et al.  Human performance and physiology: a statistical power analysis of ELF electromagnetic field research. , 1996, Bioelectromagnetics.