How Experience and Network Ties Affect the Influence of Demographic Minorities on Corporate Boards

This study examines how the influence of directors who are demographic minorities on corporate boards is contingent on the prior experience of board members and the larger social structural context in which demographic differences are embedded. We assess the effects of minority status according to functional background, industry background, education, race, and gender for a large sample of corporate outside directors at Fortune/Forbes 500 companies. The results show that (1) the prior experience of minority directors in a minority role on other boards can enhance their ability to exert influence on the focal board, while the prior experience of minority directors in a majority role can reduce their influence; (2) the prior experience of majority directors in a minority role on other boards can enhance the influence of minority directors on the focal board, and (3) minority directors are more influential if they have direct or indirect social network ties to majority directors through common memberships on other boards. Results suggest that demographic minorities can avoid out-group biases that would otherwise minimize their influence when they have prior experience on other boards or social network ties to other directors that enable them to create the perception of similarity with the majority.

[1]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  On studying managerial elites , 1992 .

[2]  Diane M. Mackie,et al.  Systematic and nonsystematic processing of majority and minority persuasive communications. , 1987 .

[3]  Rita D. Kosnik Effects of Board Demography and Directors' Incentives on Corporate Greenmail Decisions , 1990 .

[4]  Chiara Volpato,et al.  Minority influence and social categorization , 1990 .

[5]  K. N. Wexley,et al.  The relationship among perceptual similarity, sex, and performance ratings in manager-subordinate dyads. , 1983, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[6]  B. Mintz,et al.  Executive Defense: Shareholder Power and Corporate Reorganization. , 1993 .

[7]  A. Tsui,et al.  Beyond Simple Demographic Effects: The Importance of Relational Demography in Superior-Subordinate Dyads , 1989 .

[8]  C. Steele,et al.  Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  E. D. Baltzell An American business aristocracy , 1962 .

[10]  R. Murray,et al.  The Credential Society , 1980, American Journal of Education.

[11]  James D. Westphal Board Games: How CEOs Adapt to Increases in Structural Board Independence from Management , 1998 .

[12]  Beverly B. Tyler,et al.  Strategic decision models: Integrating different perspectives , 1991 .

[13]  Jay W. Lorsch,et al.  Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of America's Corporate Boards , 1989 .

[14]  Audrey J. Murrell,et al.  How does cooperation reduce intergroup bias , 1990 .

[15]  H. Tajfel Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology , 1981 .

[16]  Daniel J. Brass Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. , 1984 .

[17]  Dan R. Dalton,et al.  A decade of corporate women: some progress in the boardroom, none in the executive suite , 1999 .

[18]  Allan Bird,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL DEMOGRAPHY IN JAPANESE FIRMS: GROUP HETEROGENEITY, INDIVIDUAL DISSIMILARITY, AND TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM TURNOVER , 1993 .

[19]  D. Hambrick,et al.  The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. , 1997 .

[20]  E.,et al.  GROUPS : INTERACTION AND PERFORMANCE , 2001 .

[21]  Walter R. Nord,et al.  Managing Power , 2001, IEEE Des. Test Comput..

[22]  James P. Walsh,et al.  Selectivity and selective perception: An investigation of managers''belief structures and informatio , 1988 .

[23]  A. Portes,et al.  Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  G. Domhoff,et al.  Diversity in the Power Elite: Have Women and Minorities Reached the Top? , 1998 .

[25]  E. Uehara,et al.  Dual Exchange Theory, Social Networks, and Informal Social Support , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  M. Brewer The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time , 1991 .

[27]  G. Huber,et al.  Firm and industry as determinants of executive perceptions of the environment , 1998 .

[28]  Peter Brantley,et al.  Bank Control, Owner Control, or Organizational Dynamics: Who Controls the Large Modern Corporation? , 1992, American Journal of Sociology.

[29]  H. Simon,et al.  Selective perception: A note on the departmental identifications of executives. , 1958 .

[30]  Belle Rose Ragins,et al.  Diversified Mentoring Relationships in Organizations: A Power Perspective , 1997 .

[31]  R. Cialdini Influence: Science and Practice , 1984 .

[32]  Paul Mallette,et al.  Effects of Board Composition and Stock Ownership on the Adoption of “Poison Pills” , 1992 .

[33]  Theresa S. Cho,et al.  The Influence of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on Firms' Competitive Moves , 1996 .

[34]  Anne Sigismund Huff,et al.  Industry influences on strategy reformulation , 1982 .

[35]  C. Sundaramurthy Corporate governance within the context of antitakeover provisions , 1996 .

[36]  Douglas D. Moesel,et al.  Corporate Divestiture Intensity in Restructuring Firms: Effects of Governance, Strategy, and Performance , 1994 .

[37]  H. Tajfel Social identity and intergroup relations , 1985 .

[38]  R. Duane Ireland,et al.  Strategy formulation processes: Differences in perceptions of strength and weaknesses indicators and environmental uncertainty by managerial level , 1987 .

[39]  C. Coulton,et al.  Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression , 1993 .

[40]  Janet K. Swim,et al.  Joan McKay versus John McKay: Do gender stereotypes bias evaluations? , 1989 .

[41]  James J. Vanecko,et al.  The higher circles : the governing class in America , 1972 .

[42]  Michael Useem,et al.  Pathways to Top Corporate Management , 1986 .

[43]  C. O'Reilly,et al.  Social Capital at the Top: Effects of Social Similarity and Status on CEO Compensation , 1996 .

[44]  Edward J. Zajac,et al.  Defections from the Inner Circle: Social Exchange, Reciprocity, and the Diffusion of Board Independence in U.S. Corporations , 1995 .

[45]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[46]  R. Eccles,et al.  Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action , 1992 .

[47]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  Bringing the Individual Back in: A Structural Analysis of the Internal Market for Reputation in Organizations , 1994 .

[48]  Floyd J. Fowler,et al.  Survey Research Methods , 1984 .

[49]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Who Shall Succeed? How CEO/Board Preferences and Power Affect the Choice of New CEOs , 1996 .

[50]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Cooperative or Controlling? The Effects of CEO-Board Relations and the Content of Interlocks on the Formation of Joint Ventures , 1999 .

[51]  D. Byrne The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[52]  B. Wellman,et al.  Different Strokes from Different Folks: Community Ties and Social Support , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[53]  M. Wiersema,et al.  Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic Change , 1992 .

[54]  W. Crano,et al.  The leniency contract and persistence of majority and minority influence. , 1998 .

[55]  G. Davis,et al.  Corporate Elite Networks and Governance Changes in the 1980s , 1997, American Journal of Sociology.

[56]  Jonathan L. Johnson,et al.  Boards of Directors: A Review and Research Agenda: , 1996 .

[57]  R. C. Gardner,et al.  Content of stereotypes and the inference of similarity between members of stereotyped groups , 1964 .

[58]  Rhonda K. Reger,et al.  Strategic Leadership: Top Executives And Their Effects On Organizations , 1996 .

[59]  M. G. Smith Some problems with minority concepts and a solution , 1987 .

[60]  A. Demb,et al.  The corporate board: confronting the paradoxes. , 1992, Long range planning.

[61]  Robert F. DeVellis,et al.  Scale Development: Theory and Applications. , 1992 .

[62]  G. Mugny,et al.  Perspectives on minority influence , 1985 .

[63]  M. Hogg,et al.  Intergroup behaviour, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories , 1987 .

[64]  William H. Glick,et al.  The Selective Perception of Managers Revisited , 1997 .

[65]  S Finkelstein,et al.  Power in top management teams: dimensions, measurement, and validation. , 1992, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[66]  Michael C. White,et al.  Strategy, CEO Specialization, and Succession , 1987 .

[67]  Richard A. D'Aveni Top Managerial Prestige and Organizational Bankruptcy , 1990 .

[68]  C. Nemeth,et al.  Minority Influence, Divergent Thinking and Detection of Correct Solutions , 1987 .

[69]  R. Charles Moyer,et al.  CEO DUALITY AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: WHAT'S THE FUSS? , 1996 .

[70]  G. William Domhoff,et al.  Who Rules America? , 2021 .

[71]  S. Spencer,et al.  Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance , 1999 .

[72]  H. M. Schroder,et al.  Human Information Processing: Individuals and Groups Functioning in Complex Situations , 1970 .

[73]  Gabriel Mugny,et al.  Social support and minority influence: the innovation effect reconsidered , 1985 .

[74]  W. Mischel Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. , 1973, Psychological review.

[75]  Mustafa Emirbayer,et al.  Network Analysis, Culture, and the Problem of Agency , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[76]  B. Latané,et al.  The Social Impact of Majorities and Minorities. , 1981 .

[77]  W. Boeker Power and Managerial Dismissal: Scapegoating at the Top. , 1992 .

[78]  Scott Moss,et al.  Industry recipes: The nature and sources of managerial judgement: J.-C. Spender (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1989) pp. 240 , 1992 .

[79]  John B. Forsythe,et al.  Obtaining Cooperation in a Survey of Business Executives , 1977 .

[80]  L. H. Pelled Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory , 1996 .

[81]  C. Nemeth Differential contributions of majority and minority influence , 1986 .

[82]  Francisco Gabriel Heidemann Executive defense: shareholder power and corporate reorganization , 1997 .

[83]  Glen D. Baskett,et al.  Interview decisions as determined by competency and attitude similarity. , 1973 .

[84]  J. Lincoln,et al.  Work and Friendship Ties in Organizations: A Comparative Analysis of Relational Networks , 1979 .

[85]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[86]  Audrey J. Murrell,et al.  Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. , 1989 .

[87]  Donn Byrne,et al.  Effect of economic similarity-dissimilarity on interpersonal attraction. , 1966 .

[88]  Steven D. Penrod,et al.  Social Influence Model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes. , 1984 .

[89]  Thomas A. Russman SELECTIVE PERCEPTION , 2022 .

[90]  R. Linton,et al.  Anthropology as an Integrating Science. (An Anthropological Bibliosymposium: The Science of Man in the World Crisis) , 1945 .

[91]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[92]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[93]  Gerd Bohner,et al.  Beyond Conflict and Discrepancy: Cognitive Bias in Minority and Majority Influence , 1998 .

[94]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. , 1991 .

[95]  Brian G. M. Main,et al.  The CEO, the Board of Directors and Executive Compensation: Economic and Psychological Perspectives , 1995 .

[96]  D. Turban,et al.  Supervisor-subordinate similarity: types, effects, and mechanisms. , 1988, The Journal of applied psychology.

[97]  D. Hambrick,et al.  TOP EXECUTIVE COMMITMENT TO THE STATUS QUO: SOME TESTS OF ITS DETERMINANTS , 1993 .

[98]  Charles Stangor,et al.  Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. , 1992 .

[99]  Anne Maass,et al.  Hidden impact of minorities: Fifteen years of minority influence research. , 1984 .

[100]  William H. Glick,et al.  Functional Background as A Determinant of Executives' Selective Perception , 1995 .

[101]  S. Jackson,et al.  Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? , 1989 .

[102]  James D. Westphal,et al.  Who Shall Govern? CEO/Board Power, Demographic Similarity, and New Director Selection , 1995 .

[103]  Robert M. Groves,et al.  UNDERSTANDING THE DECISION TO PARTICIPATE IN A SURVEY , 1992 .

[104]  S. Moscovici Social influence and conformity , 1985 .

[105]  W. Ocasio The enactment of economic adversity: A reconciliation of theories of failure-induced change and threat-rigidity , 1993 .

[106]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[107]  Kurt Kraiger,et al.  A meta-analysis of ratee race effects in performance ratings. , 1985 .

[108]  Mary Anne Devanna Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[109]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Top Management Team Demography and Process: The Role of Social Integration and Communication , 1994 .

[110]  Charles C. Manz,et al.  Linking Cognition and Behavior: A Script Processing Interpretation of Vicarious Learning , 1985 .

[111]  Marc J. Dollinger,et al.  Environmental Boundary Spanning and Information Processing Effects on Organizational Performance , 1984 .

[112]  A. Bandura Social learning theory , 1977 .

[113]  David Krackhardt,et al.  When friends leave: A structural analysis of the relationship between turnover and stayers' attitudes. , 1985 .

[114]  Ivone Kirkpatrick,et al.  The inner circle : memoirs , 1959 .

[115]  P. R. Laughlin Influence and performance in simultaneous collective and individual induction , 1992 .

[116]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. , 1989 .

[117]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[118]  R. Liden,et al.  Effects of impression management on performance ratings: A longitudinal study. , 1995 .

[119]  B. Simon,et al.  When self-categorization makes sense: the role of meaningful social categorization in minority and majority members' self-perception. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[120]  Roger Pooley,et al.  Industry Recipes: The Nature and Sources of Managerial Judgement , 1989 .

[121]  S. Moscovici,et al.  Social Influence, Conformity Bias, and the Study of Active Minorities , 1972 .

[122]  Yuen J. Huo,et al.  Superordinate Identification, Subgroup Identification, and Justice Concerns: Is Separatism the Problem; Is Assimilation the Answer? , 1996 .

[123]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[124]  James P. Walsh,et al.  On the Efficiency of Internal and External Corporate Control Mechanisms , 1990 .

[125]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  At the Margins: A Distinctiveness Approach to the Social Identity and Social Networks of Underrepresented Groups , 1998 .