Leaf anatomy enables more equal access to light and CO2 between chloroplasts

The function of a leaf is photosynthesis, which requires the interception of light and access to atmospheric CO2 while controlling water loss. This paper examines the influence of leaf anatomy on both light capture and CO2 diffusion. As photosynthetic metabolism is spread between many chloroplasts, a leaf faces the challenge of matching light capture by a given chloroplast with the metabolic capacity of that chloroplast. Chloroplasts nearest the leaf surface receive the greatest irradiance and therefore absorb more light per unit chlorophyll than chloroplasts in the centre of a leaf. Electron transport and carbon fixation capacities per unit of chlorophyll decline with increasing depth in the leaf, to compensate for the decline in light absorbed per unit chlorophyll. Many key photosynthetic protein complexes in chloroplasts have nuclear encoded genetic information. Consequently, all chloroplasts within a given cell have a similar metabolic complement, which limits the potential gradient of photosynthetic capacity per unit chlorophyll across the leaf. A simple model couples light absorption through the leaf (based on the Beer–Lambert law) with the profile of chlorophyll through a leaf and the gradient in photosynthetic capacity. It is validated by comparison with 14CO2 fixation profiles through spinach leaves obtained in various studies. The model can account for published 14C fixation profiles obtained with blue, red and green light of different irradiances and white light applied in different combinations to the adaxial and abaxial surfaces of spinach leaves. The model confirms that spongy mesophyll increases the apparent extinction coefficient of chlorophyll compared to palisade tissue. The palisade tissue nearest the surface which receives light facilitates the penetration of light to a greater depth, while spongy mesophyll promotes scattering to enhance light absorption, thus reducing the gradient in light absorbed per unit chlorophyll through a leaf. CO2 fixation faces a diffusional limitation, which necessitates Rubisco to be spread evenly across the cell walls exposed to intercellular airspace. Mesophyll cell structure reflects the need to have a large cell surface per unit volume exposed to airspaces. The regular array of columnar cells in palisade tissue, or cell lobing in monocot leaves, results in greater exposed surface per unit tissue volume than spongy mesophyll. The exposed surface area per unit leaf area scales with photosynthetic capacity such that the difference in CO2 partial pressure between substomatal cavities and the sites of carboxylation within chloroplasts is, on average, independent of photosynthetic capacity of the leaf. However, Rubisco specific activity declines as the Rubisco content per unit leaf area increases due to greater internal diffusional limitations.

[1]  I. Terashima,et al.  Vertical Gradient in Photosynthetic Properties of Spinach Chloroplast Dependent on Intra-Leaf Light Environment , 1985 .

[2]  William K. Smith,et al.  Chlorophyll and light gradients in sun and shade leaves of Spinacia oleracea , 1991 .

[3]  A. Moore Encyclopaedia of plant physiology - new series: Volume 3 Edited by C. R. Stocking and U. Heber Springer; Berlin, 1976 xvii + 517 pages. DM 145, $59.50 , 1978 .

[4]  Graham D. Farquhar,et al.  Modelling of Photosynthetic Response to Environmental Conditions , 1982 .

[5]  John R. Evans,et al.  Photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency of species that differ inherently in specific leaf area , 1998, Oecologia.

[6]  John R. Evans,et al.  Determination of the Average Partial Pressure of CO2 in Chloroplasts From Leaves of Several C3 Plants , 1991 .

[7]  J. Markley,et al.  The spatial distribution of chloroplast water in Acer platanoides sun and shade leaves , 1993 .

[8]  O. Roupsard,et al.  Limitation of photosynthetic activity by CO2 availability in the chloroplasts of oak leaves from different species and during drought , 1996 .

[9]  D. F. Parkhurst,et al.  Intercellular Diffusion Limits to CO(2) Uptake in Leaves : Studies in Air and Helox. , 1990, Plant physiology.

[10]  I. R. Cowan,et al.  Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity , 1979, Nature.

[11]  I. Terashima,et al.  Effects of Light and Nitrogen Nutrition on the Organization of the Photosynthetic Apparatus in Spinach , 1988 .

[12]  G. Farquhar,et al.  On the relationship between leaf anatomy and CO2 diffusion through the mesophyll of hypostomatous leaves , 1995 .

[13]  T. Sharkey,et al.  Photosynthesis : physiology and metabolism , 2000 .

[14]  Lars Olof Björn,et al.  Measurement of light gradients and spectral regime in plant-tissue with a fiber optic probe , 1984 .

[15]  Leonid Fukshansky,et al.  A theoretical study of the light microenvironment in a leaf in relation to photosynthesis , 1992 .

[16]  D. Epron,et al.  Limitation of net CO2 assimilation rate by internal resistances to CO2 transfer in the leaves of two tree species (Fagus sylvatica L. and Castanea sativa Mill.) , 1995 .

[17]  Franklin M. Turrell,et al.  THE AREA OF THE INTERNAL EXPOSED SURFACE OF DICOTYLEDON LEAVES , 1936 .

[18]  T. Sharkey,et al.  Estimation of Mesophyll Conductance to CO(2) Flux by Three Different Methods. , 1992, Plant physiology.

[19]  J. Markley,et al.  Water is allocated differently to chloroplasts in sun and shade leaves. , 1988, Plant physiology.

[20]  S. von Caemmerer,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Diffusion inside Leaves , 1996, Plant physiology.

[21]  Thomas C. Vogelmann,et al.  The functional significance of palisade tissue : penetration of directional versus diffuse light , 1993 .

[22]  Alan K. Knapp,et al.  Measurement of light within thin plant tissues with fiber optic microprobes , 1988 .

[23]  Thomas C. Vogelmann,et al.  Green Light Drives CO2 Fixation Deep within Leaves , 1998 .

[24]  Thomas C. Vogelmann,et al.  Measurement of chlorophyll fluorescence within leaves using a fibreoptic microprobe , 1991 .

[25]  Ichiro Terashima,et al.  A new model for leaf photosynthesis incorporating the gradients of light environment and of photosynthetic properties of chloroplasts within a leaf. , 1985 .

[26]  K. Hikosaka,et al.  Nitrogen partitioning among photosynthetic components and its consequence in sun and shade plants , 1996 .

[27]  Thomas C. Vogelmann,et al.  Photosynthetic Light Gradients and Spectral Regime within Leaves of Medicago sativa , 1989 .

[28]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  Inherent Variation in Plant Growth , 1998 .

[29]  D. F. Parkhurst,et al.  Diffusion of CO2 and other gases inside leaves. , 1994, The New phytologist.

[30]  T. Sharkey,et al.  Theoretical Considerations when Estimating the Mesophyll Conductance to CO(2) Flux by Analysis of the Response of Photosynthesis to CO(2). , 1992, Plant physiology.

[31]  A. Scartazza,et al.  Genetic variation in photosynthetic capacity, carbon isotope discrimination and mesophyll conductance in provenances of Castanea sativa adapted to different environments , 1997 .

[32]  D. Heineke,et al.  Subcellular Volumes and Metabolite Concentrations in Potato (Solanum tuberosum cv. Désirée) Leaves1 , 1995 .

[33]  O. Lange Water relations and carbon assimilation , 1982 .

[34]  J. Evans Photosynthesis and nitrogen partitioning in leaves of triticum aestivum and related species , 1983 .

[35]  I. Terashima,et al.  Photosynthetic Characteristics of Spinach Leaves Grown with Different Nitrogen Treatments , 1988 .

[36]  J. R. Evans,et al.  Nitrogen and Photosynthesis in the Flag Leaf of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). , 1983, Plant physiology.

[37]  F. Loreto,et al.  Acquisition and Diffusion of CO2 in Higher Plant Leaves , 2000 .

[38]  J. Anderson,et al.  Photoregulation of the Composition, Function, and Structure of Thylakoid Membranes , 1986 .

[39]  J. Nishio,et al.  Carbon Fixation Gradients across Spinach Leaves Do Not Follow Internal Light Gradients. , 1993, The Plant cell.

[40]  Ichiro Terashima,et al.  Light Environment within a Leaf I. : Optical Properties of Paradermal Sections of Camellia Leaves with Special Reference to Differences in the Optical Properties of Palisade and Spongy Tissues , 1983 .

[41]  J. R. Evans Carbon Fixation Profiles Do Reflect Light Absorption Profiles in Leaves , 1995 .

[42]  I. Terashima,et al.  Intra-Leaf and Intracellular Gradients in Chloroplast Ultrastructure of Dorsiventral Leaves Illuminated from the Adaxial or Abaxial Side during their Development , 1986 .

[43]  G. Farquhar,et al.  Low conductances for CO2 diffusion from stomata to the sites of carboxylation in leaves of woody species , 1992 .

[44]  J. R. Evans,et al.  The Relationship Between CO2 Transfer Conductance and Leaf Anatomy in Transgenic Tobacco With a Reduced Content of Rubisco , 1994 .

[45]  I. Terashima Productive structure of a leaf , 1989 .

[46]  T. Richter,et al.  Optics of a Bifacial Leaf: 1. A Novel Combined Procedure for Deriving the Optical Parameters , 1996 .

[47]  C. Osmond,et al.  Physiological Plant Ecology I , 1981, Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology.