Uncertainty from sampling, in the context of fitness for purpose

Sampling is an integral part of nearly all chemical measurement and often makes a substantial or even a dominant contribution to the uncertainty of the measurement result. In contrast with analysis, however, the uncertainty contribution from sampling has usually been ignored. Indeed, far less is known about sampling uncertainty, although in some application sectors it is known to exceed the analytical uncertainty, especially when raw materials (natural or industrial) are under test. In 1995 the authors of this paper proposed a framework of concepts and procedures for studying, quantifying, and controlling the uncertainty arising from the sampling that normally precedes analysis. Many of the ideas were based on analogy with well-established procedures and considerations relating to quality of analytical measurement, ideas such as validation of the sampling protocol, sampling quality control and fitness for purpose. Since that time many of these ideas have been explored experimentally and found to be effective. This paper is a summary of progress to date.

[1]  M. Thompson,et al.  Collaborative trials of the sampling of two foodstuffs, wheat and green coffee. , 2002, The Analyst.

[2]  Tom Fearn,et al.  What exactly is fitness for purpose in analytical measurement , 1996 .

[3]  Michael Thompson Uncertainty of sampling in chemical analysis , 1998 .

[4]  A. Desaules,et al.  Quantifying uncertainty of the reference sampling procedure used at Dornach under different soil conditions. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  R. Howarth Statistics and data analysis in geochemical prospecting , 1983 .

[6]  Michael H. Ramsey,et al.  Quality concepts and practices applied to sampling—an exploratory study , 1995 .

[7]  Robert G. Garrett,et al.  The determination of sampling and analytical errors in exploration geochemistry , 1969 .

[8]  Michael H. Ramsey,et al.  On the collaborative trial in sampling , 1995 .

[9]  W. Horwitz,et al.  Interlaboratory variability in trace element analysis. , 1985, Analytical chemistry.

[10]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Pierre Gy's Sampling Theory and Sampling Practice , 1989 .

[11]  M. Ramsey,et al.  Synthetic reference sampling target for the estimation of measurement uncertainty , 1999 .

[12]  A. Argyraki,et al.  Estimation of sampling bias between different sampling protocols on contaminated land , 1995 .

[13]  M. Thompson,et al.  Estimating and using sampling precision in surveys of trace constituents of soils , 1993 .

[14]  Sabrina Barbizzi,et al.  A practical approach to assessment of sampling uncertainty , 2002 .

[15]  M Thompson Sampling: the uncertainty that dares not speak its name. , 1999, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[16]  Rj Howarth The J-chart: A simple plot that combines the capabilities of Shewhart and Cusum charts, for use in analytical quality control , 2003 .

[17]  Michael H. Ramsey,et al.  Proficiency testing in sampling: pilot study on contaminated land , 1995 .

[18]  H. Muntau,et al.  Estimation of measurement uncertainty by the budget approach for heavy metal content in soils under different land use , 2004 .

[19]  Michael Thompson,et al.  A decision theory approach to fitness for purpose in analytical measurement. , 2002, The Analyst.

[20]  P. Minkkinen Practical applications of sampling theory , 2004 .

[21]  M. Hale,et al.  Objective evaluation of precision requirements for geochemical analysis using robust analysis of variance , 1992 .

[22]  R. Garrett Chapter 4 - Sampling Methodology , 1983 .

[24]  M. Ramsey Sampling and analytical quality Control (SAX) for improved error estimation in the measurement of Pb in the environment using robust analysis of variance , 1993 .

[25]  Michael Thompson,et al.  The International Harmonized Protocol for the proficiency testing of analytical chemistry laboratories (IUPAC Technical Report) , 2006 .

[26]  A. Argyraki,et al.  Evaluation of inter-organisational sampling trials on contaminated land: comparison of two contrasting sites , 1998, Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publications.

[27]  Michael H. Ramsey When is sampling part of the measurement process? , 2004 .

[28]  M. Ramsey,et al.  Collaborative trial in sampling for the spatial delineation of contamination and the estimation of uncertainty , 2000 .

[29]  M. Ramsey,et al.  Inter-organisational sampling trials for the uncertainty estimation of landfill gas measurements. , 2001, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[30]  Pierre Gy,et al.  Sampling for analytical purposes , 1998 .

[31]  M. Thompson,et al.  A pilot study of routine quality control of sampling by the SAD method, applied to packaged and bulk foods. , 2004, The Analyst.

[32]  Michael H. Ramsey,et al.  Modifying uncertainty from sampling to achieve fitness for purpose: a case study on nitrate in lettuce , 2007 .