Morphological adaptations in breast cancer cells as a function of prolonged passaging on compliant substrates

Standard tissue culture practices involve propagating cells on tissue culture polystyrene (TCP) dishes, which are flat, 2-dimensional (2D) and orders of magnitude stiffer than most tissues in the body. Such simplified conditions lead to phenotypical cell changes and altered cell behaviors. Hence, much research has been focused on developing novel biomaterials and culture conditions that more closely emulate in vivo cell microenvironments. In particular, biomaterial stiffness has emerged as a key property that greatly affects cell behaviors such as adhesion, morphology, proliferation and motility among others. Here we ask whether cells that have been conditioned to TCP, would still show significant dependence on substrate stiffness if they are first pre-adapted to a more physiologically relevant environment. We used two commonly utilized breast cancer cell lines, namely MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7, and examined the effect of prolonged cell culturing on polyacrylamide substrates of varying compliance. We followed changes in cell adhesion, proliferation, shape factor, spreading area and spreading rate. After pre-adaptation, we noted diminished differences in cell behaviors when comparing between soft (1 kPa) and stiff (103 kPa) gels as well as rigid TCP control. Prolonged culturing of cells on complaint substrates further influenced responses of pre-adapted cells when transferred back to TCP. Our results have implications for the study of stiffness-dependent cell behaviors and indicate that cell pre-adaptation to the substrate needs consideration.

[1]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Differential Matrix Rigidity Response in Breast Cancer Cell Lines Correlates with the Tissue Tropism , 2009, PloS one.

[2]  Manfred Radmacher,et al.  Comparison of viscoelastic properties of cancer and normal thyroid cells on different stiffness substrates , 2016, European Biophysics Journal.

[3]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[4]  B D Boyan,et al.  Role of material surfaces in regulating bone and cartilage cell response. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[5]  Chris Bakal,et al.  Molecular Systems Biology Peer Review Process File Cell Shape and the Microenvironment Regulate Nuclear Translocation of Nf-κ B in Breast Epithelial and Tumor Cells Transaction Report , 2022 .

[6]  M. Nugent,et al.  Cell-cell interactions mediate the response of vascular smooth muscle cells to substrate stiffness. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[7]  Ya-Pu Zhao,et al.  Kinetic behaviour of the cells touching substrate: the interfacial stiffness guides cell spreading , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[8]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Matrix Stiffness: A Regulator of Cellular Behavior and Tissue Formation , 2012 .

[9]  Paul A. Janmey,et al.  Soft biological materials and their impact on cell function. , 2007, Soft matter.

[10]  U. Holmskov,et al.  The presence and activity of SP-D in porcine coronary endothelial cells depend on Akt/PI3K, Erk and nitric oxide and decrease after multiple passaging. , 2009, Molecular immunology.

[11]  B. Hinz,et al.  Expression of α-Smooth Muscle Actin Determines the Fate of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells , 2015, Stem cell reports.

[12]  Yuan Chen,et al.  Effects of long-term serial cell passaging on cell spreading, migration, and cell-surface ultrastructures of cultured vascular endothelial cells , 2014, Cytotechnology.

[13]  P. Janmey,et al.  Biomechanics and Mechanotransduction in Cells and Tissues Cell type-specific response to growth on soft materials , 2005 .

[14]  Valerie Speirs,et al.  Choosing the right cell line for breast cancer research , 2011, Breast Cancer Research.

[15]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[16]  Adam J Engler,et al.  Preparation of Hydrogel Substrates with Tunable Mechanical Properties , 2010, Current protocols in cell biology.

[17]  Alexis Carrel,et al.  TISSUE CULTURE AND CELL PHYSIOLOGY , 1924 .

[18]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Biophysical Regulation of Chromatin Architecture Instills a Mechanical Memory in Mesenchymal Stem Cells , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[19]  J. Schmid,et al.  The complexity of NF-κB signaling in inflammation and cancer , 2013, Molecular Cancer.

[20]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[21]  Minoru Hirano,et al.  Comprehensive study on cellular morphologies, proliferation, motility, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of breast cancer cells incubated on electrospun polymeric fiber substrates. , 2017, Journal of materials chemistry. B.

[22]  V. Weaver,et al.  From transformation to metastasis: deconstructing the extracellular matrix in breast cancer , 2016, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[23]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Cell–matrix adhesion , 2007, Journal of cellular physiology.

[24]  Paolo P. Provenzano,et al.  Mechanical signaling through the cytoskeleton regulates cell proliferation by coordinated focal adhesion and Rho GTPase signaling , 2011, Journal of Cell Science.

[25]  Ichiro Harada,et al.  Substrate stiffness regulates temporary NF-κB activation via actomyosin contractions. , 2013, Experimental cell research.

[26]  Paolo A Netti,et al.  Crosstalk between focal adhesions and material mechanical properties governs cell mechanics and functions. , 2015, Acta biomaterialia.

[27]  Kirsten Peters,et al.  Cell culture models of higher complexity in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[28]  Yu Wang,et al.  Senescence of Cultured Porcine Coronary Arterial Endothelial Cells Is Associated with Accelerated Oxidative Stress and Activation of NFĸB , 2009, Journal of Vascular Research.

[29]  Dennis Discher,et al.  Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[30]  B. Geiger,et al.  Environmental sensing through focal adhesions , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[31]  Laura J. Suggs,et al.  Extracellular Matrix Stiffening Induces a Malignant Phenotypic Transition in Breast Epithelial Cells , 2016, Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering.

[32]  Jenna L Balestrini,et al.  The mechanical memory of lung myofibroblasts. , 2012, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[33]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  The mechanical rigidity of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure, motility, and proliferation of glioma cells. , 2009, Cancer research.

[34]  R. Shoemaker The NCI60 human tumour cell line anticancer drug screen , 2006, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[35]  Sana Syed,et al.  Simple polyacrylamide-based multiwell stiffness assay for the study of stiffness-dependent cell responses. , 2015, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[36]  S. Thrun,et al.  Substrate Elasticity Regulates Skeletal Muscle Stem Cell Self-Renewal in Culture , 2010, Science.

[37]  R. M. Simpson,et al.  Metastatic growth from dormant cells induced by a col-I-enriched fibrotic environment. , 2010, Cancer research.

[38]  P. Janmey,et al.  Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate , 2005, Science.

[39]  R. Krishnan,et al.  Active mechanics and dynamics of cell spreading on elastic substrates. , 2014, Soft matter.

[40]  Silviya Zustiak,et al.  Multiwell stiffness assay for the study of cell responsiveness to cytotoxic drugs , 2014, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[41]  S. Zustiak The role of matrix compliance on cell responses to drugs and toxins: towards predictive drug screening platforms. , 2015, Macromolecular bioscience.

[42]  Kheya Sengupta,et al.  Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[43]  Léa Trichet,et al.  Evidence of a large-scale mechanosensing mechanism for cellular adaptation to substrate stiffness , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  D. Discher,et al.  Cell responses to the mechanochemical microenvironment--implications for regenerative medicine and drug delivery. , 2007, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[45]  J. VandeBerg,et al.  Passage-dependent changes in baboon endothelial cells--relevance to in vitro aging. , 2004, DNA and cell biology.

[46]  J. Parsons,et al.  Matrix Rigidity Regulates Cancer Cell Growth by Modulating Cellular Metabolism and Protein Synthesis , 2012, PloS one.

[47]  Micah Dembo,et al.  The dynamics and mechanics of endothelial cell spreading. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[48]  Shouren Ge,et al.  Cell adaptation to a physiologically relevant ECM mimic with different viscoelastic properties. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[49]  Fei Wang,et al.  Material Properties of the Cell Dictate Stress-induced Spreading and Differentiation in Embryonic Stem Cells Growing Evidence Suggests That Physical Microenvironments and Mechanical Stresses, in Addition to Soluble Factors, Help Direct Mesenchymal-stem-cell Fate. However, Biological Responses to a L , 2022 .

[50]  Silviya P Zustiak,et al.  Hydrolytically degradable poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel scaffolds with tunable degradation and mechanical properties. , 2010, Biomacromolecules.

[51]  Chris Bakal,et al.  Cell shape and the microenvironment regulate nuclear translocation of NF-κB in breast epithelial and tumor cells. , 2015, Molecular systems biology.

[52]  Kristi S. Anseth,et al.  Mechanical memory and dosing influence stem cell fate , 2014, Nature materials.

[53]  V. Weaver,et al.  Cellular adaptation to biomechanical stress across length scales in tissue homeostasis and disease. , 2017, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[54]  Fei Liu,et al.  A Multiwell Platform for Studying Stiffness-Dependent Cell Biology , 2011, PloS one.

[55]  Daniel Benten,et al.  Matrix stiffness modulates proliferation, chemotherapeutic response, and dormancy in hepatocellular carcinoma cells , 2011, Hepatology.

[56]  Jennifer L. West,et al.  Synthetic Materials in the Study of Cell Response to Substrate Rigidity , 2009, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[57]  E. Place,et al.  Complexity in biomaterials for tissue engineering. , 2009, Nature materials.

[58]  John R. W. Masters,et al.  Human cancer cell lines: fact and fantasy , 2000, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.