Finite Precision Representation of the Conley Decomposition

We present a theoretical basis for a novel way of studying and representing the long-time behavior of finite-dimensional maps. It is based on a finite representation of ε-pseudo orbits of a map by the sample paths of a suitable Markov chain based on a finite partition of phase space. The use of stationary states of the chain and the corresponding partition elements in approximating the attractors of maps and differential equations was demonstrated in Refs. 7 and 3 and proved for a class of stable attracting sets in Ref. 8. Here we explore the relationship between the communication classes of the Markov chain and basic sets of the Conley decomposition of a dynamical system. We give sufficient conditions for the existence of a chain transitive set and show that basic sets are isolated from each other by neighborhoods associated with closed communication classes of the chain. A partition element approximation of an isolating block is introduced that is easy to express in terms of sample paths. Finally, we show that when the map supports an SBR measure there is a unique closed communication class and the Markov chain restricted to those states is irreducible.

[1]  Robert W. Easton Isolating blocks and epsilon chains for maps , 1989 .

[2]  Michael Shub,et al.  The Newtonian graph of a complex polynomial , 1988 .

[3]  Fern Y. Hunt,et al.  Unique ergodicity and the approximation of attractors and their invariant measures using Ulam's method , 1998 .

[4]  George Osipenko,et al.  Construction of attractors and filtrations , 1999 .

[5]  D. Chillingworth THE GENERAL TOPOLOGY OF DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS , 1995 .

[6]  K. Mischaikow,et al.  Chaos in the Lorenz equations: a computer-assisted proof , 1995, math/9501230.

[7]  A. R. Humphries,et al.  Dynamical Systems And Numerical Analysis , 1996 .

[8]  Konstantin Mischaikow,et al.  Chaos in the Lorenz equations: A computer assisted proof. Part II: Details , 1998, Math. Comput..

[9]  S. Resnick Adventures in stochastic processes , 1992 .

[10]  Fern Y. Hunt,et al.  Approximating the Invariant Measures of Randomly Perturbed Dissipative Maps , 1996 .

[11]  D. Chillingworth DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS: STABILITY, SYMBOLIC DYNAMICS AND CHAOS , 1998 .

[12]  R. Easton Transport of phase space volume near isolated invariant sets , 1993 .

[13]  Michael Dellnitz,et al.  An adaptive subdivision technique for the approximation of attractors and invariant measures , 1998 .

[14]  C. Hsu,et al.  Cell-To-Cell Mapping A Method of Global Analysis for Nonlinear Systems , 1987 .

[15]  Walter M. Miller Stability and approximation of invariant measures for a class of nonexpanding transformations , 1994 .

[16]  Richard L. Tweedie,et al.  Markov Chains and Stochastic Stability , 1993, Communications and Control Engineering Series.

[17]  O. Junge,et al.  On the Approximation of Complicated Dynamical Behavior , 1999 .

[18]  Y. Kifer Random Perturbations of Dynamical Systems , 1988 .

[19]  F. Hunt,et al.  On the approximation of invariant measures , 1992 .

[20]  J. Meiss,et al.  Exit times and transport for symplectic twist maps. , 1993, Chaos.

[21]  C. Conley Isolated Invariant Sets and the Morse Index , 1978 .

[22]  O. Junge,et al.  Exploring invariant sets and invariant measures. , 1997, Chaos.

[23]  Ethan Akin,et al.  Invariant Measures for Set-Valued Dynamical Systems , 1999 .