Formally Bounding UAS Behavior to Concept of Operation with Operation-Specific Scenario Description Language

Previous work introduced an approach for formally describing the concept of operations for unmanned aircraft. For this purpose, an existing language for simulation scenario description was adapted. In the context of the specific operation category, an upcoming European regulation for the operation of unmanned aircraft, the description and acceptance of the concept of operations plays a major role for flight approval on a per mission basis. This paper extends the previous approach further with combining the formalized description of the concept of operations with our existing approach for runtime monitoring. Monitoring the behavior at runtime can be used to enforce certain limits on the behavior. Therefore, the concept of operations is an ideal input for the monitoring approach. As a basis for the information relevant for the concept of operations the official annex to the guidelines document for the specific operation risk assessment is used, as well as an internal concept of operations document for a DLR research unmanned aircraft system.

[1]  Johann Schumann,et al.  R2U2: monitoring and diagnosis of security threats for unmanned aerial systems , 2017, RV.

[2]  Leonard E. Miller,et al.  NASA systems engineering handbook , 1995 .

[3]  Jarus Secretariat,et al.  Joint Authorities for Rulemaking of Unmanned Systems , 2014 .

[4]  Levent Yilmaz,et al.  Distributed Simulation: A Model Driven Engineering Approach , 2016 .

[5]  James Brady,et al.  Certification strategies using run-time safety assurance for part 23 autopilot systems , 2016, 2016 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[6]  Bernd Finkbeiner,et al.  LOLA: runtime monitoring of synchronous systems , 2005, 12th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning (TIME'05).

[7]  Umut Durak,et al.  Towards a Standardization for Simulation Scenario Development in Aviation - Panel Discussion , 2018 .

[8]  Johann Schumann,et al.  Temporal-Logic Based Runtime Observer Pairs for System Health Management of Real-Time Systems , 2014, TACAS.

[9]  Umut Durak,et al.  Adapting Scenario Definition Language for Formalizing UAS Concept of Operations , 2018 .

[10]  Bernard P. Zeigler,et al.  System entity structuring and model base management , 1990, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[11]  Daniel Jackson,et al.  Lightweight Formal Methods , 2001, FME.

[12]  Stephen P. Cook An ASTM Standard for Bounding Behavior of Adaptive Algorithms for Unmanned Aircraft Operations (Invited) , 2017 .

[13]  Sven Hartmann,et al.  Computational Representation for a Simulation Scenario Definition Language , 2018 .

[14]  Johann Schumann,et al.  Iowa State University From the SelectedWorks of Kristin Yvonne Rozier 2014 Runtime Observer Pairs and Bayesian Network Reasoners On-board FPGAs : Flight-Certifiable System Health Management for Embedded Systems , 2017 .

[15]  Bernd Finkbeiner,et al.  A Stream-Based Specification Language for Network Monitoring , 2016, RV.

[16]  Cody H. Fleming Safety-driven early concept analysis and development , 2015 .

[17]  Sven Hartmann,et al.  Using System Entity Structures to Model the Elements of a Scenario in a Research Flight Simulator , 2017 .

[18]  Johann Schumann,et al.  R 2 U 2 : Monitoring and Diagnosis of Security Threats for Unmanned Aerial Systems ? , 2015 .

[19]  Bernard P. Zeigler,et al.  Modeling & Simulation-Based Data Engineering: Introducing Pragmatics into Ontologies for Net-Centric Information Exchange , 2007 .