Ridging, strength, and stability in high-resolution sea ice models

[1] In multicategory sea ice models the compressive strength of the ice pack is often assumed to be a function of the potential energy of pressure ridges. This assumption, combined with other standard features of ridging schemes, allows the ice strength to change dramatically on short timescales. In high-resolution (∼10 km) sea ice models with a typical time step (∼1 hour), abrupt strength changes can lead to large internal stress gradients that destabilize the flow. The unstable flow is characterized by large oscillations in ice concentration, thickness, strength, velocity, and strain rates. Straightforward, physically motivated changes in the ridging scheme can reduce the likelihood of abrupt strength changes and improve stability. In simple test problems with flow toward and around topography, stability is significantly enhanced by eliminating the threshold fraction G* in the ridging participation function. Use of an exponential participation function increases the maximum stable time step at 10-km resolution from less than 30 min to about 2 hours. Modifying the redistribution function to build thinner ridges modestly improves stability and also gives better agreement between modeled and observed thickness distributions. Allowing the ice strength to increase linearly with the mean ice thickness improves stability but probably underestimates the maximum stresses.

[1]  Waldemar Walczowski,et al.  On climatological mass, heat, and salt transports through the Barents Sea and Fram Strait from a pan-Arctic coupled ice-ocean model simulation , 2004 .

[2]  Mark A. Hopkins,et al.  Four stages of pressure ridging , 1998 .

[3]  W. Hibler.  A Dynamic Thermodynamic Sea Ice Model , 1979 .

[4]  J. Gray.  Loss of hyperbolicity and ill-posedness of the viscous-plastic sea ice rheology in uniaxial divergent flow , 1999 .

[5]  E. Hunke,et al.  An Elastic–Viscous–Plastic Model for Sea Ice Dynamics , 1996 .

[6]  John K. Dukowicz,et al.  Comments on ''Stability of the Viscous-Plastic Sea Ice Rheology'' , 1997 .

[7]  William D. Hibler,et al.  Ridging and strength in modeling the thickness distribution of Arctic sea ice , 1995 .

[8]  William H. Lipscomb,et al.  Influence of the Sea Ice Thickness Distribution on Polar Climate in CCSM3 , 2006 .

[9]  D. Rothrock,et al.  Role of rafting in the mechanical redistribution of sea ice thickness , 2002 .

[10]  D. Feltham,et al.  A continuum anisotropic model of sea-ice dynamics , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[11]  William H. Lipscomb,et al.  Modeling Sea Ice Transport Using Incremental Remapping , 2004 .

[12]  William H. Lipscomb,et al.  High resolution simulations of Arctic sea ice, 1979–1993 , 2003 .

[13]  D. Feltham,et al.  Dependence of Sea Ice Yield-Curve Shape on Ice Thickness , 2004 .

[14]  J. Gray,et al.  Reply to the comment on the 'Stability of the viscous-plastic sea ice rheology' , 1995 .

[15]  D. Rothrock,et al.  The energetics of the plastic deformation of pack ice by ridging , 1975 .

[16]  W. Lipscomb.  Remapping the thickness distribution in sea ice models , 2001 .

[17]  M Lepparanta,et al.  FIELD MEASUREMENTS OF THE STRUCTURE AND STRENGTH OF FIRST-YEAR ICE RIDGES IN THE BALTIC SEA , 1989 .

[18]  Hrvoje Jasak,et al.  A strength implicit correction scheme for the viscous-plastic sea ice model , 2004 .

[19]  William D. Hibler,et al.  A viscous sea ice law as a stochastic average of plasticity , 1977 .

[20]  Nina Nordlund,et al.  Monitoring ice thickness in Fram Strait , 1998 .

[21]  Ron Kwok,et al.  Open water production in Arctic sea ice: Satellite measurements and model parameterizations , 1995 .

[22]  Mark A. Hopkins,et al.  On the ridging of intact lead ice , 1994 .

[23]  William D. Hibler,et al.  Modeling a variable thickness sea ice cover , 1980 .

[24]  J. Walsh,et al.  On Modeling Seasonal and Interannual Fluctuations of Arctic Sea Ice , 1982 .

[25]  William H. Lipscomb,et al.  Evaluation of the sea ice simulation in a new coupled atmosphere‐ocean climate model (HadGEM1) , 2006 .

[26]  R. E. Moritz,et al.  Geometry and the deformation of pack ice: II. Simulation with a random isotropic model and implication in sea-ice rheology , 2000, Annals of Glaciology.

[27]  William D. Hibler,et al.  On an efficient numerical method for modeling sea ice dynamics , 1997 .

[28]  J. W. Govoni,et al.  STRUCTURE OF FIRST-YEAR PRESSURE RIDGE SAILS IN THE PRUDHOE BAY REGION , 1984 .

[29]  Brian Veitch,et al.  The life story of a first-year sea ice ridge , 1995 .

[30]  M. Maltrud,et al.  Numerical simulation of the North Atlantic Ocean at 1/10 degrees , 2000 .

[31]  R. Pritchard.  Stability of sea ice dynamics models: Viscous‐plastic rheology, replacement closure, and tensile cutoff , 2005 .

[32]  John K. Dukowicz,et al.  The Elastic Viscous Plastic Sea Ice Dynamics Model in General Orthogonal Curvilinear Coordinates on a Sphere—Incorporation of Metric Terms , 2002 .

[33]  Ron Kwok,et al.  Relating arctic pack ice stress and deformation under winter conditions , 2002 .

[34]  W. Lipscomb,et al.  Sensitivity analysis and parameter tuning scheme for global sea-ice modeling , 2006 .

[35]  William H. Lipscomb,et al.  An energy-conserving thermodynamic model of sea ice , 1999 .

[36]  R. Kwok,et al.  Seasonal ice area and volume production of the Arctic Ocean: November 1996 through April 1997 , 2002 .

[37]  J. Richter-Menge,et al.  Characteristics of pack ice stress in the Alaskan Beaufort Sea , 1998 .

[38]  D. Rothrock,et al.  Modeling Arctic sea ice with an efficient plastic solution , 2000 .

[39]  M. Coon,et al.  Model of pressure ridge formation in sea ice , 1972 .

[40]  H. Melling,et al.  Geometrical constraints on the evolution of ridged sea ice , 2004 .

[41]  J. Halverson,et al.  Modulation of convection in the southwestern Amazon basin by extratropical stationary fronts , 2002 .

[42]  Elizabeth C. Hunke,et al.  Viscous–Plastic Sea Ice Dynamics with the EVP Model: Linearization Issues , 2001 .

[43]  D. Rothrock,et al.  Effect of sea ice rheology in numerical investigations of climate , 2005 .

[44]  R. Colony,et al.  The thickness distribution of sea ice , 1975 .