Effects of substrate structure on speed and acceleration capacity in climbing geckos

We studied the effects of substrate structure on locomotor performance in a climbing gecko, Hemidactylus garnoti. We quantified three performance traits (acceleration capacity, instantaneous speed, and final speed) on three substrates: (i) smooth wood, (ii) a cloth surface, and (iii) a wire mesh. While acceleration capacity and instantaneous speed were highest on the wooden surface, final speed did not differ significantly among substrates. Using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) pictures, we estimated that 98% of the wooden surface is available for adhesion by the setae on the toepads, while this percentage is much lower for the mesh and cloth (41 and 37%, respectively). We suggest that when a gecko climbs up a gap-filled substrate, such as the wire mesh or cloth, adhesion will only happen between part of the toepad and the substrate, resulting in a diminished acceleration capacity. The higher acceleration capacity on the wooden substrate and the fact that the geckos tend to slip less often on this particular surface, may explain the difference in instantaneous speed. As for final speed, geckos might achieve similar final speeds on all three substrates by employing different locomotor strategies. Our results suggest that microhabitat use in nature might have a profound effect on locomotor performance and survival for climbing lizards such as geckos. © 2005 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2005, 85, 385–393.

[1]  B. Sinervo,et al.  The effects of morphology and perch diameter on sprint performance of Anolis lizards , 1989 .

[2]  B. Gardiner,et al.  Linnean Society of London , 1956, Nature.

[3]  P Aerts,et al.  Spatio-temporal gait characteristics of level and vertical locomotion in a ground-dwelling and a climbing gecko. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[4]  D. Irschick,et al.  An intraspecific analysis of trade-offs in sprinting performance in a West Indian lizard species (Anolis lineatopus) , 1998 .

[5]  W. Grossmann,et al.  Amphibien & Reptilien Südostasiens , 1997 .

[6]  Oliver Betz,et al.  Performance and adaptive value of tarsal morphology in rove beetles of the genus Stenus (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae). , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[7]  J. Schulte,et al.  Correlates of active body temperatures and microhabitat occupation in nine species of central Australian agamid lizards , 2001 .

[8]  R. Van Damme,et al.  Evolutionary trade‐offs in locomotor capacities in lacertid lizards: are splendid sprinters clumsy climbers? , 2001, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[9]  R. Full,et al.  Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Robert J. Full,et al.  Locomotion of Hermit Crabs (Coenobita Compressus) on Beach and Treadmill , 1986 .

[11]  Jayne,et al.  Effects of incline and speed on the three-dimensional hindlimb kinematics of a generalized iguanian lizard (Dipsosaurus dorsalis) , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[12]  Zani The comparative evolution of lizard claw and toe morphology and clinging performance , 2000 .

[13]  Amy E. Kerdok,et al.  Energetics and mechanics of human running on surfaces of different stiffnesses. , 2002, Journal of applied physiology.

[14]  R. Full,et al.  Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair , 2000, Nature.

[15]  D. Bauwens,et al.  Thermal biology, microhabitat selection, and conservation of the insular lizard Podarcis hispanica atrata , 2004, Oecologia.

[16]  A. Russell,et al.  The morphological basis of weight-bearing in the scansors of the tokay gecko (Reptilia: Sauria) , 1986 .

[17]  D. Claussen,et al.  Effects of Slope, Substrate, and Temperature on the Locomotion of the Ornate Box Turtle, Terrapene ornata , 2002, Copeia.

[18]  B. Jayne,et al.  Effects of incline on speed, acceleration, body posture and hindlimb kinematics in two species of lizard Callisaurus draconoides and Uma scoparia. , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[19]  R. Huey,et al.  EFFECTS OF BODY SIZE AND SLOPE ON SPRINT SPEED OF A LIZARD (STELLIO (AGAMA) STELLIO) , 1982 .

[20]  Ludwik Leibler,et al.  Theory of Tackiness , 1999 .

[21]  A. Russell A contribution to the functional analysis of the foot of the Tokay, Gekko gecko (Reptilia: Gekkonidae) , 1975 .

[22]  J. Losos,et al.  The effect of perch diameter on escape behaviour of Anolis lizards : laboratory predictions and field tests , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  Robert N. Fisher,et al.  A comparative analysis of clinging ability among pad‐bearing lizards , 1996 .

[24]  Bieke Vanhooydonck,et al.  Effects of loading and size on maximum power output and gait characteristics in geckos , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[25]  R. Ruibal,et al.  The structure of the digital setae of lizards , 1965, Journal of morphology.

[26]  T. Garland,et al.  Ecological Morphology of Locomotor Performance in Squamate Reptiles , 2022 .

[27]  Nigel E. Stork,et al.  Experimental Analysis of Adhesion of Chrysolina Polita (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera) on a Variety of Surfaces , 1980 .

[28]  S. Gorb,et al.  Roughness-dependent friction force of the tarsal claw system in the beetle Pachnoda marginata (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae). , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[29]  T. Garland,et al.  Integrating function and ecology in studies of adaptation: Investigations of locomotor capacity as a model system , 2001 .

[30]  U. Hiller Untersuchungen zum Feinbau und zur Funktion der Haftborsten von Reptilien , 1968, Zeitschrift für Morphologie der Tiere.

[31]  Barry Sinervo,et al.  Walking the Tight Rope: Arboreal Sprint Performance Among Sceloporus Occidentalis Lizard Populations , 1991 .