Project Risk Screening Matrix for River Management and Restoration

The ‘project risk screening matrix’ derives from a broader effort to assist US government agency staff in reviewing proposed stream management and restoration projects more efficiently and effectively. The River Restoration Analysis Tool (RiverRAT) developed through this effort provides a thorough, comprehensive and auditable approach to review and evaluate proposed stream actions and projects (www.restorationreview.com). The matrix was initially developed as the first step in applying the RiverRAT, its purpose being to assist reviewers in assessing the risk to natural resources associated with a particular proposal and matching the intensity of their review to the severity of that risk. Hence, the primary application of the matrix to date has been to identify and screen out low risk projects that may be dealt with expeditiously, so freeing the time and technical resources needed to allow deep reviews of higher risk projects. A second form of screening emerged from this primary function because the matrix proved adept at identifying the minimum level of site and project characterization required to support initial risk assessment. On this basis, proposals lacking adequate information can also be screened out, being referred back to the proponent with a request for additional information. More recently, new and novel versions of the matrix, featuring modification and refinement of one or both of the original axes, have emerged to widen and refine its application to linear infrastructure (e.g. pipelines, roads, and electrical transmission lines), in‐stream structures (e.g. large wood placement and culvert removal), and pre‐application, regulatory, decision‐support tools. Published 2014. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

[1]  S. Schumm.  The Fluvial System , 1977 .

[2]  R. Hey.  DETERMINATE HYDRAULIC GEOMETRY OF RIVER CHANNELS , 1978 .

[3]  W. Little,et al.  Model Study of Low Drop Grade Control Structures , 1982 .

[4]  A. M. Osman,et al.  Riverbank Stability Analysis. II: Applications , 1988 .

[5]  Hiram W. Li,et al.  Cumulative Effects of Riparian Disturbances along High Desert Trout Streams of the John Day Basin, Oregon , 1994 .

[6]  Malcolm Newson,et al.  Hydrology and the River Environment , 1994 .

[7]  P. Downs,et al.  Developing Geomorphic Post Project Appraisals for Environmentally-Aligned River Channel Management , 1997 .

[8]  Ronald W. Tuttle,et al.  Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices , 1998 .

[9]  Ian G. Cowx,et al.  Rehabilitation of rivers for fish , 1998 .

[10]  D. Knighton.  Fluvial Forms and Processes: A New Perspective , 1998 .

[11]  F. Douglas Shields.  Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices (New Federal Interagency Guidance Document) , 1999 .

[12]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Channel Processes, Classification, and Response , 2000 .

[13]  PETER W. DOWNS,et al.  Post-Project Appraisals in Adaptive Management of River Channel Restoration , 2002, Environmental management.

[14]  T. Abbe,et al.  A Framework for Delineating Channel Migration Zones , 2003 .

[15]  Mark G. Macklin,et al.  River sediments, great floods and centennial‐scale Holocene climate change , 2003 .

[16]  S. Broadmeadow,et al.  The effects of riparian forest management on the freshwater environment: a literature review of best management practice , 2004 .

[17]  Peter W. Downs,et al.  River Channel Management: Towards sustainable catchment hydrosystems , 2004 .

[18]  Andrew Simon,et al.  Riparian vegetation and fluvial geomorphology , 2004 .

[19]  M. Fox,et al.  A Regional and Geomorphic Reference for Quantities and Volumes of Instream Wood in Unmanaged Forested Basins of Washington State , 2007 .

[20]  Peggy A. Johnson,et al.  Case Study in Cost-Based Risk Assessment for Selecting a Stream Restoration Design Method for a Channel Relocation Project , 2007 .

[21]  T. Beechie,et al.  Channel incision, evolution and potential recovery in the Walla Walla and Tucannon River basins, northwestern USA , 2008 .

[22]  G. Harvey,et al.  Exploring the interactions between flood defence maintenance works and river habitats: the use of River Habitat Survey data , 2009 .

[23]  Colin R. Thorne,et al.  Guidebook of Applied Fluvial Geomorphology , 2009 .

[24]  Gilberto SALESa,et al.  AQUATIC CONSERVATION: MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS , 2010 .

[25]  Emily H. Stanley,et al.  The evolving legacy of disturbance in stream ecology: concepts, contributions, and coming challenges , 2010, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[26]  J. Castro,et al.  Science base and tools for evaluating stream engineering, management, and restoration proposals , 2011 .

[27]  Janine M. Castro,et al.  Developing, Designing, and Implementing Restoration Projects , 2012 .

[28]  B. CLUERa,et al.  A Stream Evolution Model Integrating Habitat and Ecosystem Benefits , 2012 .

[29]  G. Pess,et al.  JUVENILE SALMON RESPONSE TO THE PLACEMENT OF ENGINEERED LOG JAMS (ELJS) IN THE ELWHA RIVER, WASHINGTON STATE, USA , 2012 .