The effect of animacy on the choice of referring expression

Theories of reference assume that the referent's salience in the discourse context affects the choice between pronouns and definite noun phrases or names. We examined whether and how the referent's inherent properties affect the choice of expressions by investigating animacy. Experiment 1 showed that pronouns were more frequent for animates than inanimates after discourse factors were controlled, and Experiments 2 and 3 showed that the referent's animacy affected pronoun use when the competitor's animacy was counterbalanced, suggesting that the referent's inherent salience has an effect. Furthermore, when the referent was animate, pronouns were less frequent when the competitor was also animate than when it was inanimate, whereas no effect of animacy congruence was found with inanimate referents, suggesting that when the competitor was salient and similar in meaning to the referent, it made the referent's representation less accessible.

[1]  Mutsumi Yamamoto,et al.  Animacy and reference , 1999 .

[2]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[3]  F. Ferreira.  Choice of Passive Voice is Affected by Verb Type and Animacy , 1994 .

[4]  Erica C. Garcia.  What “reflexivity” is really like , 1996 .

[5]  M. D’Esposito.  Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[6]  Anette Rosenbach,et al.  Genitive variation in English : conceptual factors in synchronic and diachronic studies , 2002 .

[7]  Ö. Dahl,et al.  Animacy in grammar and discourse , 1996 .

[8]  M. Miller.  Agency , 2010 .

[9]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[10]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  The Effect of Thematic Roles on Pronoun Use and Frequency of Reference Continuation , 2001 .

[11]  M. H. Kelly,et al.  Word and World Order: Semantic, Phonological, and Metrical Determinants of Serial Position , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  S. Brennan.  Centering Attention in Discourse. , 1995 .

[13]  Mercè Prat-Sala,et al.  Discourse constraints on syntactic processing in language production , 2000 .

[14]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Language production : Grammatical encoding , 1994 .

[15]  C. Fletcher.  Markedness and topic continuity in discourse processing , 1984 .

[16]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression: Everyone counts. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.

[17]  M. Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .

[18]  A Pollatsek,et al.  On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  A Student's Introduction to English Grammar: Information packaging in the clause , 2005 .

[20]  Roger P. G. van Gompel,et al.  Choosing anaphoric expressions : do people take into account likelihood of reference? , 2010 .

[21]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[22]  Susan L. Ehrlich,et al.  Point of View: A Linguistic Analysis of Literary Style , 1993 .

[23]  Robert L. Mason,et al.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 2003 .

[24]  K. Bock,et al.  From conceptual roles to structural relations: bridging the syntactic cleft. , 1992, Psychological review.

[25]  山本 睦美,et al.  Animacy and reference : a cognitive approach to corpus linguistics , 1999 .

[26]  Judith Aissen,et al.  Differential Object Marking: Iconicity vs. Economy , 2003 .

[27]  J. K. Bock,et al.  Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation , 1985, Cognition.

[28]  T. Givón.  Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction , 1983 .

[29]  Anne H. Anderson,et al.  The Accessibility of Pronominal Antecedents as a Function of Episode Shifts in Narrative Text , 1983 .

[30]  Jeanette K. Gundel,et al.  Cognitive Status and the form of Referring Expressions in Discourse , 1993, The Oxford Handbook of Reference.

[31]  Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al.  The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking , 2000, Cognition.

[32]  Holly P. Branigan,et al.  Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production , 2008 .

[33]  Gary D. Prideaux,et al.  Nominal properties as determinants of subject selection , 1985 .

[34]  R. Fowler.  语言学与小说 = Linguistics and the novel , 2013 .

[35]  Martin J Pickering,et al.  The use of visual context during the production of referring expressions , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  T. Givon.  Topic Continuity in Discourse , 1983 .

[37]  Kathy Y. van Nice,et al.  Task sensitivity of animacy effects: evidence from German picture descriptions , 2003 .

[38]  Victor S. Ferreira,et al.  How do speakers avoid ambiguous linguistic expressions? , 2005, Cognition.

[39]  Stephani Foraker,et al.  The role of prominence in pronoun resolution: Active versus passive representations , 2007 .

[40]  Rosemary J. Stevenson,et al.  Thematic roles, focus and the representation of events , 1994 .

[41]  H. H. Clark,et al.  The Semantics of Sentence Subjects , 1971, Language and speech.

[42]  Comrie Bernard.  Language Universals and Linguistic Typology , 1982 .

[43]  Mira Ariel.  Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents , 1990 .

[44]  J. Oberlander,et al.  Interpreting pronouns and connectives: Interactions among focusing, thematic roles and coherence relations , 2000 .