Distinct Molecular Mechanisms for Agonist Peptide Binding to Types A and B Cholecystokinin Receptors Demonstrated Using Fluorescence Spectroscopy*

Fluorescence spectroscopy provides a direct method for evaluating the environment of a fluorescent ligand bound to its receptor. We utilized this methodology to determine the environment of Alexa within a cholecystokinin (CCK)-like probe (Alexa488-Gly-[(Nle28,31)CCK-26–33]; CCK-8 probe) bound to the type A CCK receptor (Harikumar, K. G., Pinon, D. L., Wessels, W. S., Prendergast, F. G., and Miller, L. J. (2002) J. Biol. Chem. 277, 18552–18560). Here, we study this probe at the type B CCK receptor and develop another probe with its fluorophore closer to the carboxyl-terminal pharmacophore of type B receptor ligands (Alexa488-Trp-Nle-Asp-Phe-NH2; CCK-4 probe). Both probes bound to type B CCK receptors in a saturable and specific manner and represented full agonists. Similar to the type A receptor, at the type B receptor these probes exhibited shorter lifetimes and lower anisotropy when the receptor was in the active conformation than when it was shifted to its inactive, G protein-uncoupled state using guanosine 5′-[β,γ-imido]-triphosphate trisodium salt. Absolute values for lifetime and anisotropy were lower for the CCK-8 probe bound to the type B receptor than for this probe bound to the type A receptor, and Alexa fluorescence was more easily quenched by iodide at the type B receptor. This represents the first direct evidence that, despite having identical affinities for binding and potencies for activating type A and B receptors, CCK is docked via distinct mechanisms, with the amino terminus more exposed to the aqueous milieu when bound to the type B CCK receptor than to the type A CCK receptor. Of interest, despite this difference in binding, activation of both receptors results in analogous direction of movement of the fluorescent indicator probes.

[1]  L. Miller,et al.  Use of N,O-bis-Fmoc-D-Tyr-ONSu for introduction of an oxidative iodination site into cholecystokinin family peptides. , 2009, International journal of peptide and protein research.

[2]  L. Miller,et al.  Heterodimerization of Type A and B Cholecystokinin Receptors Enhance Signaling and Promote Cell Growth* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  T. Lybrand,et al.  Moleular models for cholecystokinin-A receptor. , 2002, Pharmacology & toxicology.

[4]  L. Miller,et al.  Environment and Mobility of a Series of Fluorescent Reporters at the Amino Terminus of Structurally Related Peptide Agonists and Antagonists Bound to the Cholecystokinin Receptor* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[5]  T. Lybrand,et al.  Refinement of the conformation of a critical region of charge-charge interaction between cholecystokinin and its receptor. , 2002, Molecular pharmacology.

[6]  L. Miller,et al.  Insights into the Molecular Basis of Ligand Binding by the Cholecystokinin Receptor , 2001, Pancreatology.

[7]  B. Roques,et al.  CCK-B receptor: chemistry, molecular biology, biochemistry and pharmacology , 1999, Progress in Neurobiology.

[8]  E. Kojro,et al.  Direct identification of the agonist binding site in the human brain cholecystokininB receptor. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[9]  L. Miller,et al.  Protean effects of a natural peptide agonist of the G protein-coupled secretin receptor demonstrated by receptor mutagenesis. , 1998, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[10]  B. Kobilka,et al.  G Protein-coupled Receptors , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  T. Lybrand,et al.  Direct Identification of a Second Distinct Site of Contact between Cholecystokinin and Its Receptor* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  T. Lybrand,et al.  Direct Identification of a Distinct Site of Interaction between the Carboxyl-terminal Residue of Cholecystokinin and the Type A Cholecystokinin Receptor Using Photoaffinity Labeling* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  J. Rehfeld,et al.  Elasmobranchs express separate cholecystokinin and gastrin genes. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  B. Maigret,et al.  Identification of Two Amino Acids of the Human Cholecystokinin-A Receptor That Interact with the N-terminal Moiety of Cholecystokinin* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  H. Khorana,et al.  Requirement of Rigid-Body Motion of Transmembrane Helices for Light Activation of Rhodopsin , 1996, Science.

[16]  L. F. Kolakowski,et al.  Identification of cholecystokinin-B/gastrin receptor domains that confer high gastrin affinity: utilization of a novel Xenopus laevis cholecystokinin receptor. , 1996, Molecular pharmacology.

[17]  L. Miller,et al.  Relationship Between Native and Recombinant Cholecystokinin Receptors: Role of Differential Glycosylation , 1996, Pancreas.

[18]  S. Silvente-Poirot,et al.  A Segment of Five Amino Acids in the Second Extracellular Loop of the Cholecystokinin-B Receptor Is Essential for Selectivity of the Peptide Agonist Gastrin* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  August B. Smit,et al.  Co-evolution of Ligand-Receptor Pairs in the Vasopressin/Oxytocin Superfamily of Bioactive Peptides (*) , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  H Philippe,et al.  An evolutionary view of drug-receptor interaction: the bioamine receptor family. , 1995, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[21]  L. F. Kolakowski,et al.  The Role of the Cholecystokinin-B/Gastrin Receptor Transmembrane Domains in Determining Affinity for Subtype-selective Ligands(*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[22]  R. Campbell,et al.  Co-evolution of ligand-receptor pairs , 1994, Nature.

[23]  J. Rehfeld,et al.  Identification of cholecystokinin/gastrin peptides in frog and turtle. Evidence that cholecystokinin is phylogenetically older than gastrin. , 1992, European journal of biochemistry.

[24]  M. Thorndyke,et al.  Evidence for a common evolutionary origin of brain and pancreas cholecystokinin receptors. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  R. Tsien,et al.  A new generation of Ca2+ indicators with greatly improved fluorescence properties. , 1985, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[26]  D. Phillips,et al.  Picosecond spectroscopy: applications in biochemistry. Part I: Techniques. , 1984, Biochemical Society transactions.

[27]  D Rodbard,et al.  Ligand: a versatile computerized approach for characterization of ligand-binding systems. , 1980, Analytical biochemistry.

[28]  J. Rehfeld,et al.  Evidence for a common evolutionary origin of gastrin and cholecystokinin , 1977, Nature.

[29]  T. Lybrand,et al.  Measurement of intermolecular distances for the natural agonist Peptide docked at the cholecystokinin receptor expressed in situ using fluorescence resonance energy transfer. , 2004, Molecular pharmacology.

[30]  Kolakowski Lf GCRDB: A G-PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTOR DATABASE , 1994 .

[31]  J M Beechem,et al.  Global analysis of biochemical and biophysical data. , 1992, Methods in enzymology.