Methodological and Conceptual Issues in the Study of Multifunctionality and Rural Development

Acareful analysis of the scale and depth of the more recent changes in rural areas reveals the contours of a new development trajectory. The key features of this trajectory are diversity and multifunctionality: diversity reflected in the actors involved, the particular activities undertaken and the patterns of motivation that emerge, and multifunctionality in the simultaneous and interrelated provision of different functions (Van der Ploeg et al. 2000). Researchers involved in rural development face a two-fold challenge. First, they must improve their understanding of multifunctionality and, second and more practically, they must acquire insights into the complex and interrelated processes that contribute to the development of rural areas. The aim of this article is to outline the complexity of those rural development processes that specifically relate to the phenomenon of multifunctionality. An attempt is made to structure the various patterns of multifunctionality found in the European countryside, and different levels of multifunctionality, key changes, linkages and influences have been identified. More specifically, an attempt is made to find adequate ways of unraveling and visualizing the complex interrelationships and changes involved in the rural development process. In addition, we have tried to improve our understanding of these interrelationships taking into account their spatial and temporal dimensions. Finally, we have tried to identify the data needed for a quantitative assessment of the changes taking place at the different levels of farm, farm household, other rural enterprises, region, multipliers, and substitution effects. In the discussion reference is made to several case studies from the impact research programme. 1

[1]  F. Ventura,et al.  Theory and Practice of Multi‐Product Farms: Farm Butcheries in Umbria , 2000 .

[2]  J. Kinsella,et al.  Pluriactivity as a livelihood strategy in Irish farm households and its role in rural development , 2000 .

[3]  G. Bristow,et al.  Food supply chain approaches: exploring their role in rural development. , 2000 .

[4]  J. D. Ploeg,et al.  Impact and Potential: A Comparative Review of European Rural Development Practices , 2000 .

[5]  Karlheinz Knickel,et al.  Rural Development: From Practices and Policies towards Theory , 2000 .

[6]  J. D. Ploeg Revitalizing Agriculture : Farming Economically as Starting Ground for Rural Development , 2000 .

[7]  Gianluca Brunori,et al.  Synergy and coherence through collective action : Some insights from wine routes in Tuscany , 2000 .

[8]  T. Marsden,et al.  Integrating agri-environment policy, farming systems and rural development : Tir Cymen in Wales , 2000 .

[9]  F. Offermann,et al.  Economic Performance of Organic Farms in Europe , 2000 .

[10]  J. D. van Mansvelt,et al.  The appearance of agriculture: An assessment of the quality of landscape of both organic and conventional horticultural farms in West Friesland , 2000 .

[11]  Nigel Walford,et al.  Reshaping the countryside : perceptions and processes of rural change , 1999 .

[12]  J. Alier La economía ecológica como ecología humana: = Ecological economics as human ecology = Die ökologische Ökonomie als Humanökologie , 1998 .

[13]  K. Morgan The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal , 1997 .

[14]  R. Norgaard Development betrayed: the end of progress and a coevolutionary revisioning of the future. , 1994 .