The Benefits of Peer Collaboration: A Replication with a Delayed Posttest.

The benefits of peer collaboration on strategy use, metacognitive causal attribution, and recall were supported in an earlier study (Manion & Alexander, 1997). Following that study two primary questions remained: Would the observed benefits last beyond an immediate posttest, and would they last regardless of which strategy the children chose to use? The current investigation explores those questions. Thirty-one fourth-grade students from two public schools in Sydney, Australia, experienced either a peer-collaborative treatment condition or an individual task (control condition). A posttest was conducted 5.5 weeks later. As was the case in the original study, children in the treatment condition outperformed children in the control condition in strategy use, metacognitive understanding of strategy chosen, and recall gain. Benefits also sustained regardless of the strategy children chose to implement on the task. Most importantly, the benefits lasted after a period of over a month. Implications for future research are discussed. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

[1]  Sam C. Brown,et al.  Comparison of measures for the estimation of clustering in free recall. , 1971 .

[2]  David F. Bjorklund,et al.  Developmental trends in children’s typicality judgments , 1983 .

[3]  Rose J. Dimant,et al.  Development of formal reasoning during successive peer interactions. , 1991 .

[4]  D. Perkins,et al.  Teaching for Transfer. , 1988 .

[5]  Michael S. Meloth,et al.  Effects of two cooperative conditions on peer-group discussions, reading comprehension, and metacognition , 1992 .

[6]  Penelope L. Peterson,et al.  Problems in Classroom Implementation of Cognitive Strategy Instruction , 1983 .

[7]  Noreen M. Webb,et al.  Verbal Interaction and Learning in Peer-Directed Groups. , 1985 .

[8]  Joel R. Levin,et al.  Cognitive strategy research : educational applications , 1983 .

[9]  Robert S. Siegler,et al.  How Content Knowledge, Strategies, and Individual Differences Interact to Produce Strategy Choices , 1990 .

[10]  S. Paris,et al.  Children's Metacognition About Reading: issues in Definition, Measurement, and Instruction , 1987 .

[11]  P. Strain,et al.  Peer-assisted interventions: Early promises, notable achievements, and future aspirations , 1990 .

[12]  Franz Emanuel Weinert,et al.  Interactions Among Aptitudes, Strategies, and Knowledge in Cognitive Performance , 1990 .

[13]  Franz Emanuel Weinert,et al.  Memory performance and competencies : issues in growth and development , 1995 .

[14]  P. V. Meter,et al.  Memory Strategies: Natural Development and Use Following Instruction , 1993 .

[15]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Age Differences in Reactions to Help in a Peer Tutoring Context. , 1989 .

[16]  Ann L. Brown.  Learning, remembering, and understanding , 1982 .

[17]  W. Fabricius,et al.  The Role of Causal Theories about Memory in Young Children's Memory Strategy Choice. , 1989 .

[18]  N. Webb.  Predicting learning from student interaction: Defining the interaction variables , 1983 .

[19]  P. Schwanenflugel,et al.  Category typicality, cultural familiarity, and the development of category knowledge. , 1990 .

[20]  J. Alexander,et al.  The benefits of peer collaboration on strategy use, metacognitive casual attribution, and recall. , 1997, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[21]  D. Cross,et al.  Informed strategies for learning: a program to improve children's reading awareness and comprehension , 1984 .

[22]  Agnès Blaye,et al.  Collaboration as a facilitator of planning and problem solving on a computer‐based task , 1991 .

[23]  I. Sigel,et al.  HANDBOOK OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY , 2006 .

[24]  Paula J. Schwanenflugel,et al.  Strategy regulation: The role of intelligence, metacognitive attributions, and knowledge base. , 1994 .

[25]  M. L. Howe,et al.  Emerging Themes in Cognitive Development , 1993, Springer New York.