Dragonfly: A rotorcraft lander concept for scientific exploration at titan

The major post-Cassini knowledge gap concerning Saturn’s icy moon Titan is in the composition of its diverse surface, and in particular how far its rich organics may have ascended up the ”ladder of life.” The NASA New Frontiers 4 solicitation sought mission concepts addressing Titan’s habitability and methane cycle. A team led by the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) proposed a revolutionary lander that uses rotors to land in Titan’s thick atmosphere and low gravity and can repeatedly transit to new sites, multiplying the mission’s science value from its capable instrument payload. Titan is an “ocean world” that is rich in both carbon and nitrogen.4,5 See Table 1 for data on Titan’s environment. FORMULATION OF THE DRAGONFLY CONCEPT The NASA community announcement in January 2016 identifying Titan as a possible target for the fourth New Frontiers mission opened new possibilities in Titan exploration (Box 1). Although the exploration of Titan’s seas had previously been considered, notably by the APL-led Titan Mare Explorer (TiME) Discovery concept,6,7 the timing mandated by the announcement of opportunity precluded such a mission. Specifically, with launch specified prior to the end of 2025, Titan arrival would be in the mid-2030s, during northern winter. This means the seas, near Titan’s north pole, are in darkness and direct-to-Earth (DTE) communication is impossible.8 Even with the higher budget threshold of New Frontiers 4 ($850 million plus launch and operations costs) compared with Discovery (~$450 million INTRODUCTION Saturn’s moon Titan is in many ways the most Earthlike body in the solar system.1–3 This strange world is larger than the planet Mercury and has a thick nitrogen atmosphere laden with organic smog, which partly hides its surface from view. Since cold Titan is far from the Sun, on Titan methane plays the active role that water plays on Earth, serving as a condensable greenhouse gas, forming clouds and rain, and pooling on the surface as lakes and seas. Titan’s carbon-rich surface is shaped not only by impact craters and by winds that sculpt drifts of aromatic organics into long linear dunes but also by methane rivers and possible eruptions of liquid water (“cryovolcanism”). While living things are ~70% water, and finding water has been a convenient initial focus for astrobiological investigations in the solar system, the chemical processes that conspire to lead to life rely on functions exerted by compounds of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and hydrogen, with traces of sulfur and phosphorus (CHNOPS). In contrast to Europa (abundant in water, and perhaps sulfur), Dragonfly: A Rotorcraft Lander Concept for Scientific Exploration at Titan Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest, Volume 34, Number 3 (2018), www.jhuapl.edu/techdigest 375 plus radioisotope power source and launch costs), it would be challenging indeed to provide a relay spacecraft and a sea probe. A lander with DTE communication would be possible at lower latitudes, however. The only detailed study of such a mission (see Box 2) was the 2007 Titan Explorer NASA Flagship Mission Study,9,10 led by the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (APL). This study advocated the science that could be obtained from three platforms, an orbiter, a hot-air (Montgolfière) balloon, and a lander. The lander (designed before Titan’s seas had been discovered) was intended to be delivered to Titan’s Belet sand sea, a large—and thus easily targeted— dune field expected to be free of rock and gully hazards. After the lander’s parachute descent and landing on Pathfinder-like airbags (wherein if it landed on top of a dune, it would just roll down to the bottom), petals would unfold and science would begin, with cameras, a chemical analysis suite, a seismometer, and a meteorology package. Much of the science definition in the Titan Explorer Study was useful in formulating the Dragonfly proposal. A scientific limitation of a single lander, however, is that it explores only a single location. This limitation can be mitigated slightly at “grab-bag” landing sites where geological processes have gathered samples from a range of areas (in Mars Pathfinder’s case, a flood deposit of rocks; dune sands may similarly have material from a range of source locations). However, a lander with some kind of mobility, or augmented by some mobile element (e.g., a “fetch” rover), would help address the challenge of acquiring samples from sites more interesting than the landing point, a site that would be most likely selected for safety rather than for scientific interest. The concept of a rotorcraft lander on Titan tricklecharging a battery for brief atmospheric flights by using the power from a radioisotope power source had been proposed some 17 years ago.11,12 At that time, the vehicle was imagined to be a helicopter, a vehicle that is used on Earth for near-guaranteed access to a wide range of terrain, for personnel delivery, and for search and rescue. However, helicopters are mechanically complex (one

[1]  C. Chyba,et al.  Astrobiology: The Study of the Living Universe , 2005 .

[2]  J. Lunine,et al.  Rate measurements of the hydrolysis of complex organic macromolecules in cold aqueous solutions: implications for prebiotic chemistry on the early Earth and Titan. , 2008, Astrobiology.

[3]  A. Harri,et al.  The diurnal water cycle at Curiosity: Role of exchange with the regolith , 2016 .

[4]  R. Lorenz Physics of saltation and sand transport on Titan: A brief review , 2014 .

[5]  Mark Leese,et al.  Speed of sound measurements and the methane abundance in Titan's atmosphere , 2007 .

[6]  Randolph L. Kirk,et al.  Radarclinometry of the sand seas of Africa’s Namibia and Saturn’s moon Titan , 2010 .

[7]  C. Sotin,et al.  The moon that would be a planet. , 2010, Scientific American.

[8]  T. Tokano Relevance of fast westerlies at equinox for the eastward elongation of Titan’s dunes , 2010 .

[9]  Á. Somogyi,et al.  Titan's primordial soup: formation of amino acids via low-temperature hydrolysis of tholins. , 2009, Astrobiology.

[10]  Ralph D. Lorenz,et al.  Energy Cost of Acquiring and Transmitting Science Data on Deep-Space Missions , 2015 .

[11]  T. Farr,et al.  Modeling the SAR backscatter of linear dunes on Earth and Titan , 2014 .

[12]  E. Angelis,et al.  TandEM: Titan and Enceladus mission , 2009 .

[13]  Rosaly M. C. Lopes,et al.  The Sand Seas of Titan: Cassini RADAR Observations of Longitudinal Dunes , 2006, Science.

[14]  R. Lorenz,et al.  Post-Cassini Exploration of Titan - Science Rationale and Mission Concepts , 2000 .

[15]  Kris Zacny,et al.  PlanetVac: Pneumatic regolith sampling system , 2014, 2014 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[16]  B. Charnay,et al.  Two boundary layers in Titan/'s lower troposphere inferred from a climate model , 2012 .

[17]  Ralph D. Lorenz,et al.  Flight Power Scaling of Airplanes, Airships, and Helicopters: Application to Planetary Exploration , 2001 .

[18]  Robert Hodyss,et al.  Fluorescence spectra of Titan tholins: in-situ detection of astrobiologically interesting areas on Titan's surface , 2004 .

[19]  R. Lorenz,et al.  Twilight on Ligeia: Implications of communications geometry and seasonal winds for exploring Titan’s seas 2020–2040 , 2015 .

[20]  Morgan T. Burks,et al.  The GeMini Plus High-Purity Ge Gamma-Ray Spectrometer: Instrument Overview and Science Applications , 2017 .

[21]  G. D. McDonald,et al.  Electrification of sand on Titan and its influence on sediment transport , 2017 .

[22]  R. Lorenz The Exploration of Titan , 2006 .

[23]  E. B. Bierhaus,et al.  TiME - The Titan Mare Explorer , 2013, 2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[24]  Louis Qualls,et al.  NASA's Radioisotope Power Systems planning and potential future systems overview , 2016, 2016 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[25]  F. Ferri,et al.  Titan's planetary boundary layer structure at the Huygens landing site , 2006 .

[26]  T. Farr,et al.  Linear dunes on Titan and earth: Initial remote sensing comparisons , 2010 .

[27]  Ralph D. Lorenz,et al.  Seakeeping on Ligeia Mare : Dynamic Response of a Floating Capsule to Waves on the Hydrocarbon Seas of Saturn ’ s Moon Titan , 2015 .

[28]  Jonathan L. Mitchell,et al.  AVIATR—Aerial Vehicle for In-situ and Airborne Titan Reconnaissance , 2010 .

[29]  K. Edgett,et al.  Search for ultraviolet luminescence of soil particles at the Phoenix landing site, Mars , 2012 .

[30]  Jack W. Langelaan,et al.  Energetics of rotary-wing exploration of Titan , 2017, 2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[31]  Young H. Lee,et al.  Radioisotope Power Systems Reference Book for Mission Designers and Planners , 2015 .

[32]  A. Hayes,et al.  Growth mechanisms and dune orientation on Titan , 2014 .

[33]  C. McKay,et al.  The greenhouse and antigreenhouse effects on Titan , 1991, Science.

[34]  B. White,et al.  Higher-than-predicted saltation threshold wind speeds on Titan , 2014, Nature.

[35]  C. McKay,et al.  Possibilities for methanogenic life in liquid methane on the surface of Titan , 2005 .

[36]  E. Karkoschka Titan's meridional wind profile and Huygens' orientation and swing inferred from the geometry of DISR imaging , 2016 .

[37]  D. Plettemeier,et al.  Winds on Titan from ground‐based tracking of the Huygens probe , 2006 .

[38]  Jonathan L. Mitchell,et al.  The Climate of Titan , 2016 .