Exports, University-Industry Linkages, and Innovation Challenges in Bangalore, India

The success of the Indian software industry is now internationally recognized. Consequently, scholars, policymakers, and industry officials everywhere generally anticipate the increasing competitiveness of India in high technology activities. Using a structural framework, the author argues that Bangalore's (and India's) information technology (IT) industry is predicated on an Indian business model which does not encourage thick institutional linkages such as those encapsulated by the triple helix model. Under this institutional arrangement there is cross-fertilization of new ideas and new modes of institutional interaction between industry, academia, and government. Though there are several hundred IT businesses in a milieu of numerous engineering and science colleges and high-end public sector research institutes, the supposed thick institutional architecture is in reality quite thin. This is due to a particular type of an export-oriented model which is based on off-shore development of software services, targeted mainly to the United States. Neither domestic market nor non-U.S. markets such as East Asia are pursued aggressively by Indian firms, which offer alternative forms of learning. Consequently, Bangalore's dynamism in the IT industry stems from linear and extensive growth rather than nonlinear and intensive growth. The author argues that Bangalore has serious innovation challenges with weak university-industry linkages, lack of inter-firm collaboration, and the absence of cross-fertilization between the knowledge-intensive defense/public sector and the commercial IT industry. To strengthen Bangalore's and India's innovation system, the Indian business model must be reformed by diversifying geographical and product markets, stemming international and internal brain drain, and contributing to urban infrastructure.

[1]  J. Mathews,et al.  Tiger Technology: The Creation of a Semiconductor Industry in East Asia , 2000 .

[2]  Aya Okada Bangalore’s Software Cluster , 2005 .

[3]  Tarun Khanna,et al.  The Evolution of Concentrated Ownership in India Broad Patterns and a History of the Indian Software Industry , 2004 .

[4]  Carl J. Dahlman,et al.  India and the knowledge economy: leveraging strengths and opportunities , 2005 .

[5]  Takayuki Hayashi Effect of R&D programmes on the formation of university-industry-government networks: comparative analysis of Japanese R&D programmes , 2003 .

[6]  Ashish Arora,et al.  The Software Industry and India's Economic Development , 2001 .

[7]  James Heitzman Network City: Planning the Information Society in Bangalore , 2004 .

[8]  Zaheer Baber,et al.  Globalization and Scientific Research: The Emerging Triple Helix of State-Industry-University Relations in Japan and Singapore , 2001 .

[9]  AnnaLee Saxenian,et al.  The Silicon Valley Connection: Transnational Networks and Regional Development in Taiwan, China and India , 2002 .

[10]  A. D’Costa The International Mobility of Technical Talent: Trends and Development Implications , 2006 .

[11]  Anthony P. D’Costa,et al.  The Indian Software Industry in the Global Division of Labour , 2004 .

[12]  M. Kenney,et al.  Creating an Environment for Venture Capital in India , 2002 .

[13]  Anthony P. D’Costa,et al.  The International Mobility of Technical Talent , 2006 .

[14]  S. Mani Institutional support for investment in domestic technologies: An analysis of the role of government in India , 2004 .

[15]  Ron Hira U.S. immigration regulations and India's information technology industry , 2004 .

[16]  A. D’Costa India and Japan in Comparative Perspectives , 2004 .

[17]  P. Reddy,et al.  New trends in globalization of corporate R&D and implications for innovation capability in host countries: A survey from India , 1997 .

[18]  Anthony P. D’Costa,et al.  Uneven and Combined Development: Understanding India's Software Exports , 2003 .

[19]  Jinn-yuh Hsu THE EVOLVING INSTITUTIONAL EMBEDDEDNESS OF A LATE-INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT IN TAIWAN , 2004 .

[20]  Suma Athreye,et al.  The Indian Software Industry and its Evolving Service Capability , 2005 .

[21]  I. Audirac Information-Age Landscapes Outside the Developed World Bangalore, India, and Guadalajara, Mexico , 2003 .

[22]  K. Joseph,et al.  Innovation Under Export Orientation , 2004 .

[23]  P. D. Kaushik,et al.  ICT Initiatives in India: Lessons for Broad-based Development , 2006 .

[24]  P. Dicken Global Shift: Reshaping the Global Economic Map in the 21st Century , 2003 .

[25]  D. Doloreux,et al.  What we should know about regional systems of innovation , 2002 .

[26]  M. Castells The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture , 1999 .

[27]  Mauro Lombardi,et al.  The evolution of local production systems: the emergence of the "invisible mind" and the evolutionary pressures towards more visible "minds" , 2003 .

[28]  J. Thomas Informational Development in Rural Areas: Some Evidence from Andhra Pradesh and Kerala , 2005 .

[29]  Timothy J. Sturgeon,et al.  What Really Goes on in Silicon Valley? Spatial Clustering and Dispersal in Modular Production Networks , 2003 .

[30]  Karl P. Sauvant UNCTAD, World Investment Report 2004: The Shift Towards Services (Geneva and New York: United Nations, 2004). , 2004 .

[31]  Ning Li,et al.  An exceptional development pattern , 2004 .

[32]  Anthony D'Costa,et al.  Software outsourcing and development policy implications: an Indian perspective , 2002, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[33]  Bent Petersen,et al.  Role of Transnational Corporations in the Evolution of a High-Tech Industry: The Case of India's Software Industry , 2002 .

[34]  M. Castells End of Millennium: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture , 1997 .

[35]  K. Joseph,et al.  Developing Countries: Lessons from the Indian Experience* , 2022 .

[36]  G. Prabhu Implementing university–industry joint product innovation projects , 1999 .

[37]  Louis Y.Y. Lu,et al.  R&D in China: An Empirical Study of Taiwanese it Companies , 2004 .

[38]  Dan Breznitz Development, Flexibility, and R&D Performance in the Taiwanese it Industry - Capability Creation and the Effects of State-Industry Co-Evolution , 2005 .

[39]  Uma S. Kambhampati,et al.  The software industry and development: the case of India , 2002 .

[40]  Richard Heeks,et al.  India′s Software Industry: State Policy, Liberalisation and Industrial Development , 1996 .

[41]  a H. A. . Tsai Knowledge Spillovers and High-Technology Clustering: Evidence from Taiwan's Hsinchu Science-Based Industrial Park , 2005 .

[42]  Anthony P. D’Costa,et al.  Export Growth and Path Dependence: The Locking-in of Innovations in the Software Industry , 2002 .

[43]  Manuel V. Heitor,et al.  Knowledge for Inclusive Development , 2002 .

[44]  K. Debackere,et al.  Policies to Stimulate Regional Innovation Capabilities Via University-Industry Collaboration: An Analysis and an Assessment , 2003 .

[45]  Rakesh Basant,et al.  U.S.-India Technology Cooperation and Capability Building: The Role of Inter-Firm Alliances in Knowledge-Based Industries , 2003 .

[46]  Richard Heeks,et al.  India's software industry , 1996 .

[47]  H. Etzkowitz,et al.  The Innovating Region: Toward a Theory of Knowledge-Based Regional Development , 2005 .

[48]  A. Arora,et al.  The Indian Software Industry , 2000 .

[49]  B. Parthasarathy,et al.  Globalization and Agglomeration in Newly Industrializing Countries: The State and the Information Technology Industry in Bangalore, India , 2000 .

[50]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[51]  L. Leydesdorff The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovations , 2000 .

[52]  Gareth Rees,et al.  Cities and regions in the new learning economy , 2001 .

[53]  Eswaran Sridharan Evolving Towards Innovation? The Recent Evolution and Future Trajectory of the Indian Software Industry , 2004 .

[54]  M. Anchordoguy,et al.  Japan's software industry: a failure of institutions? , 2000 .