Instance-based Semantic Interoperability in the Cultural Heritage

This paper gives a comprehensive overview over the problem of Semantic Interoperability in the Cultural Heritage domain, with a particular tbcus on solutions centered around extensional, i.e., instance-based, ontology matching methods. It presents three typical scenarios requiring interoperability, one with homogeneous collections, one with heterogeneous collections, and one with multi-lingual collections. It discusses two different ways to evaluate potential alignments, one based on the application of re-indexing, one using a reference alignment. To these scenarios we apply extensional matching with different similarity measures, which gives interesting insight into the applicability of this matching approach. Finally, we firmly position our work in the Cultural Heritage context through an extensive discussion of the relevance for, and isstles related to this specific field. The findings are as unspectacular as expected, but nevertheless important: the provided methods can really improve interoperability in a number of important cases, but they are not universal solutions to all related problems. This paper provides a solid foundation for any future work on Semantic Interoperability in the Cultural Heritage domain, in particular tbr anybody intending to apply extensional methods.

[1]  Bob J. Wielinga,et al.  Aligning Large SKOS-Like Vocabularies: Two Case Studies , 2010, ESWC.

[2]  Chris Clifton,et al.  Database Integration Using Neural Networks: Implementation and Experiences , 2000, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[3]  Eero Hyvönen,et al.  ONKI SKOS Server for Publishing and Utilizing SKOS Vocabularies and Ontologies as Services , 2009, ESWC.

[4]  E. B. Wilson Probable Inference, the Law of Succession, and Statistical Inference , 1927 .

[5]  Christian Wartena,et al.  Instanced-Based Mapping between Thesauri and Folksonomies , 2008, SEMWEB.

[6]  Philipp Mayr,et al.  Building a Terminology Network for Search: The KoMoHe Project , 2008, Dublin Core Conference.

[7]  Gerd Stumme,et al.  FCA-MERGE: Bottom-Up Merging of Ontologies , 2001, IJCAI.

[8]  Konstantin Todorov,et al.  Variable Selection as an Instance-Based Ontology Mapping Strategy , 2009, SWWS.

[9]  Andreas Thor,et al.  Instance-based matching of hierarchical ontologies , 2007, BTW.

[10]  Renée J. Miller,et al.  Leveraging data and structure in ontology integration , 2007, SIGMOD '07.

[11]  Alon Y. Halevy,et al.  Semantic Integration Research in the Database Community : A Brief Survey , 2005 .

[12]  Gwenn Englebienne,et al.  Learning Concept Mappings from Instance Similarity , 2008, SEMWEB.

[13]  Claus Zinn,et al.  Putting Ontology Alignment in Context: Usage Scenarios, Deployment and Evaluation in a Library Case , 2008, ESWC.

[14]  Katrin Simone Zaiß,et al.  Instance-based ontology matching and the evaluation of matching systems , 2010 .

[15]  Jérôme Euzenat,et al.  Similarity-Based Ontology Alignment in OWL-Lite , 2004, ECAI.

[16]  Stefan Schlobach,et al.  Vocabulary Matching for Book Indexing Suggestion in Linked Libraries - A Prototype Implementation and Evaluation , 2009, SEMWEB.

[17]  Erhard Rahm,et al.  A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching , 2001, The VLDB Journal.

[18]  Yi Li,et al.  RiMOM: A Dynamic Multistrategy Ontology Alignment Framework , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[19]  Steffen Staab,et al.  04391 Executive Summary -- Semantic Interoperability and Integration , 2005 .

[20]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  Collecting Community-Based Mappings in an Ontology Repository , 2008, SEMWEB.

[21]  Stefan Schlobach,et al.  An Empirical Study of Instance-Based Ontology Matching , 2007, ISWC/ASWC.

[22]  Stefan Schlobach,et al.  Multi-concept Alignment and Evaluation , 2007, OM.

[23]  Pedro M. Domingos,et al.  Learning to map between ontologies on the semantic web , 2002, WWW '02.

[24]  Diane Vizine-Goetz,et al.  Vocabulary Mapping for Terminology Services , 2004, J. Digit. Inf..

[25]  Heike Neuroth,et al.  Searching and browsing multiple subject gateways in the Renardus service , 2005 .

[26]  J. Euzenat,et al.  Ontology Matching , 2007, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[27]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative , 2007 .

[28]  Pedro M. Domingos,et al.  Learning to Match the Schemas of Data Sources: A Multistrategy Approach , 2003, Machine Learning.

[29]  Antonio L. Furtado,et al.  Instance-Based OWL Schema Matching , 2009, ICEIS.

[30]  Diane Vizine-Goetz,et al.  Evaluating Dewey concepts as a knowledge base for automatic subject assignment , 1997, DL '97.

[31]  Stefan Schlobach,et al.  Matching Multi-lingual Subject Vocabularies , 2009, ECDL.

[32]  Fausto Giunchiglia,et al.  Semantic Matching: Algorithms and Implementation , 2007, J. Data Semant..

[33]  Fausto Giunchiglia,et al.  Save Up to 99% of Your Time in Mapping Validation , 2010, OTM Conferences.

[34]  Simon Spero,et al.  LCSH is to Thesaurus as Doorbell is to Mammal: Visualizing Structural Problems in the Library of Congress Subject Headings , 2008, Dublin Core Conference.

[35]  Yannis Kalfoglou,et al.  Ontology mapping: the state of the art , 2003, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[36]  Ryutaro Ichise,et al.  Integrating Multiple Internet Directories by Instance-based Learning , 2003, IJCAI.

[37]  HardmanLynda,et al.  Semantic annotation and search of cultural-heritage collections , 2008 .

[38]  Michel C. A. Klein,et al.  Matching Unstructured Vocabularies Using a Background Ontology , 2006, EKAW.

[39]  Claus Zinn,et al.  Evaluating Thesaurus Alignments for Semantic Interoperability in the Library Domain , 2009, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[40]  Gwenn Englebienne,et al.  Similarity features, and their role in concept alignment learning , 2010 .

[41]  Pedro M. Domingos,et al.  Ontology Matching: A Machine Learning Approach , 2004, Handbook on Ontologies.

[42]  Stefan Schlobach,et al.  Deriving Concept Mappings through Instance Mappings , 2008, ASWC.

[43]  Kai-Uwe Kühnberger,et al.  Mining Concept Similarities for Heterogeneous Ontologies , 2010, ICDM.

[44]  Hyoil Han,et al.  A survey on ontology mapping , 2006, SGMD.

[45]  Fausto Giunchiglia,et al.  A Large Scale Taxonomy Mapping Evaluation , 2005, International Semantic Web Conference.

[46]  Willem Robert van Hage,et al.  Sample Evaluation of Ontology-Matching Systems , 2007, EON.

[47]  Claus Zinn,et al.  A Web-Based Repository Service for Vocabularies and Alignments in the Cultural Heritage Domain , 2010, ESWC.

[48]  Véronique Malaisé,et al.  Anchoring Dutch Cultural Heritage Thesauri to WordNet: Two Case Studies , 2007, LaTeCH@ACL 2007.

[49]  Lora Aroyo,et al.  Semantic annotation and search of cultural-heritage collections: The MultimediaN E-Culture demonstrator , 2008, J. Web Semant..

[50]  Guus Schreiber,et al.  Combining vocabulary alignment techniques , 2009, K-CAP '09.

[51]  Boris Motik,et al.  MAFRA - A MApping FRAmework for Distributed Ontologies , 2002, EKAW.