International and Domestic Technology Transfers and Productivity Growth: Firm Level Evidence

We examine the impact of international and domestic technology transfers on firms' productivity performance in a sample of 448 Belgian innovating firms during 2003--2006. Technology transfers may occur through R&D contracting, purchase of licenses and know-how, purchase of specialized machinery, hiring of specialized personnel, and various informal channels. Estimates of a dynamic productivity model show that firms engaging in international knowledge transfer strategies record substantially and significantly higher productivity growth. While we do not find statistical evidence of complementarity between international and domestic transfers, the largest impact on productivity is found if firms combine international and domestic transfer strategies, suggesting that a diverse external technology sourcing strategy combining local know-how with know-how from abroad is most effective. Such combined domestic and international technology sourcing strategies are associated with firms' basic research orientation, R&D intensity, and the successful use of technology protection strategies to appropriate the benefits of innovation efforts. Foreign multinational firms are more likely to adopt technology transfer strategies solely focusing on international transfers. Multinational firms do not exhibit faster productivity growth if the effects of technology transfers and R&D are taken into account. Copyright 2013 The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Associazione ICC. All rights reserved., Oxford University Press.

[1]  P. Romer.  Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States , 2002 .

[3]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  International R&D spillovers , 1995 .

[4]  Jozef Konings,et al.  The Impact of Training on Productivity and Wages: Firm-Level Evidence , 2009, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[5]  Irene Bertschek,et al.  Product and Process Innovation As a Response To Increasing Imports and Foreign Direct-investment , 1995 .

[6]  A. Arora,et al.  COMPLEMENTARITY AND EXTERNAL LINKAGES: THE STRATEGIES OF THE LARGE FIRMS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY* , 1990 .

[7]  R. Veugelers,et al.  COMPLEMENTARITY BETWEEN TECHNOLOGY MAKE AND BUY IN INNOVATION STRATEGIES : EVIDENCE FROM BELGIAN MANUFACTURING FIRMS , 1998 .

[8]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  Productivity growth, R&D and the rôle of international collaborative agreements: some évidence for Belgian manufacturing companies , 2003 .

[9]  R. Veugelers,et al.  R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence , 1998 .

[10]  Overseas R&D Activities by Japanese Multinational Enterprises: Causes, Impacts and Interaction with Parent Firms , 2005 .

[11]  P. Mohnen,et al.  # 2007-025 Measuring the Effectiveness of R & D tax credits in the Netherlands , 2007 .

[12]  D. Greenaway,et al.  Much Ado About Nothing? Do Domestic Firms Really Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment? , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[13]  Werner Bönte,et al.  R&D and productivity: Internal vs. external R&D - evidence from west german manufacturing industries , 2003 .

[14]  Lee Branstetter,et al.  The impact of technology transfer and R & D on productivity growth in Taiwanese industry: Microeconometric analysis using plant and firm-level data , 2006 .

[15]  Ralf Martin,et al.  Multinationals and US Poductivity Leadership: Evidence from Great Britain , 2005 .

[16]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  Foreign subsidiaries as a channel of international technology diffusion: Some direct firm level evidence from Belgium , 2004 .

[17]  K. Hussinger,et al.  Export Behavior and Firm Productivity in German Manufacturing: A Firm-Level Analysis , 2005 .

[18]  Stephen J. Redding,et al.  Mapping The Two Faces Of R&D: Productivity Growth In A Panel Of OECD Industries , 2000 .

[19]  Jaider Vega Jurado,et al.  Does external knowledge sourcing matter for innovation? Evidence from the Spanish manufacturing industry , 2009 .

[20]  Y. Todo,et al.  Overseas R&D Activities and Home Productivity Growth: Evidence from Japanese Firm-Level Data , 2008 .

[21]  J. Fariñas,et al.  Firm productivity and export markets: a non-parametric approach , 2002 .

[22]  Why Foreign-owned Firms are Different: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence for Austria , 2000 .

[23]  Tony S. Frost.  The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries' innovations , 2001 .

[24]  Stephen Bond,et al.  GMM Estimation with persistent panel data: an application to production functions , 1999 .

[25]  L. Sleuwaegen,et al.  A closer look at the productivity advantage of foreign affiliates , 2005 .

[26]  G. Grossman,et al.  Endogenous Product Cycles , 1989 .

[27]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  Are External Technology Sourcing Strategies Substitutes or Complements?: The Case of Embodied versus Disembodied Technology Acquisition , 2007 .

[28]  T. Klette,et al.  Accumulation of R&D Capital and Dynamic Firm Performance: a Not-so-Fixed Effect Model , 1998 .

[29]  Jacques Mairesse,et al.  Measuring the Returns to R&D , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[30]  Arthur P. Becker,et al.  Psychological Production and Conservation , 1949 .

[31]  Rachel Griffith,et al.  How Special is the Special Relationship? Using the Impact of Us R&D Spillovers on UK Firms as a Test of Technology Sourcing , 2004 .

[32]  Hiroyuki Odagiri,et al.  Overseas R&D, knowledge sourcing, and patenting: an empirical study of Japanese R&D investment in the US , 2004 .

[33]  L. Bellmann,et al.  (Why) do Foreign-owned Firms in Germany Achieve Above-average Productivity? , 2002 .

[34]  Tony S. Frost,et al.  R&D co-practice and ‘reverse’ knowledge integration in multinational firms , 2005 .

[35]  Rakesh Basant,et al.  The Effects of R&D, Foreign Technology Purchase, and Domestic and International Spillovers on Productivity in Indian Firms , 1996 .

[36]  R. Caves.  International Corporations: The Industrial Economics of Foreign Investment , 1971 .

[37]  Paul Almeida,et al.  Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry , 1996 .

[38]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[39]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge flows within multinational corporations , 2000 .

[40]  P. Beneito.  The innovative performance of in-house and contracted R&D in terms of patents and utility models , 2006 .

[41]  Mark Doms,et al.  Comparing Wages, Skills, and Productivity between Domestically and Foreign-Owned Manufacturing Establishments in the United States , 1998 .

[42]  M. Kugler.  Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment: Within or between Industries? , 2006 .

[43]  A. Kokko,et al.  Multinational Corporations and Spillovers , 1998 .

[44]  Martin Srholec.  Cooperation and Innovative Performance of Firms: Panel Data Evidence from the Czech Republic, Norway and the UK , 2014 .

[45]  B. Javorcik.  Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers Through Backward Linkages , 2002 .

[46]  Mona Haddad,et al.  Are there positive spillovers from direct foreign investment?: Evidence from panel data for Morocco , 1993 .

[47]  Larry Willmore,et al.  Technological Imports and Technological Effort: An Analysis of Their Determinants in Brazilian Firms , 1991 .

[48]  Boris Lokshin,et al.  The Productivity Effects of Internal and External R&D: Evidence from a Dynamic Panel Data Model , 2008 .

[49]  R. Belderbos,et al.  Intra-firm technology transfer and R&D in foreign affiliates: Substitutes or complements? Evidence from Japanese multinational firms , 2008 .

[50]  Charles I. Jones,et al.  Sources of U.S. Economic Growth in a World of Ideas , 1998 .

[51]  Saul Lach,et al.  Is "Learning-by-Exporting" Important? Micro-Dynamic Evidence from Colombia, Mexico and Morocco , 1996 .

[52]  Jaeyong Song,et al.  The paradox of technological capabilities: a study of knowledge sourcing from host countries of overseas R&D operations , 2008 .

[53]  Gustavo Crespi,et al.  Productivity Growth, Knowledge Flows, and Spillovers , 2007 .

[54]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[55]  R. Paap,et al.  Generalized Reduced Rank Tests Using the Singular Value Decomposition , 2003 .

[56]  L. Sleuwaegen,et al.  Does Foreign Direct Investment Crowd Out Domestic Entrepreneurship? , 2002 .

[57]  Amy Jocelyn Glass,et al.  International technology transfer and the technology gap , 1998 .

[58]  A. Spithoven,et al.  Beyond borders : internationalisation of R&D and policy implications for small open economies , 2005 .

[59]  M. Carree,et al.  Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance , 2004 .

[60]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[61]  N. Driffield,et al.  The multinational enterprise as a source of international knowledge flows: Direct evidence from Italy , 2010 .

[62]  P. Gertler,et al.  Welfare gains from Foreign Direct Investment through technology transfer to local suppliers , 2008 .

[63]  John M. Mezias,et al.  Identifying liabilities of foreignness and strategies to minimize their effects: the case of labor lawsuit judgments in the United States , 2002 .

[64]  P. Criscuolo.  Inter-firm reverse technology transfer: the home country effect of R&D internationalization , 2009 .

[65]  Ignacio Fernández-de-Lucio,et al.  Does external knowledge sourcing matter for innovation? Evidence from the Spanish manufacturing industry , 2009 .

[66]  Lee Branstetter,et al.  Is Foreign Direct Investment a Channel of Knowledge Spillovers? Evidence from Japan&Apos;S FDI in the United States , 2000 .

[67]  J. Shaver,et al.  Does international research and development increase patent output? An analysis of Japanese pharmaceutical firms , 2005 .

[68]  T. Klette.  R&D, Scope Economies, and Plant Performance , 1996 .

[69]  B. V. P. D. L. Potterie,et al.  The internationalisation of technology analysed with patent data , 2001 .

[70]  S. Globerman.  Foreign Direct Investment and `Spillover' Efficiency Benefits in Canadian Manufacturing Industries. , 1979 .

[71]  Srilata Zaheer.  Overcoming the Liability of Foreignness , 1995 .

[72]  Kyoji Fukao,et al.  Foreign and domestic R&D investment , 2009 .

[73]  R. Caves,et al.  Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis: Preface , 2007 .

[74]  Janice C. Eberly,et al.  A Unified Model of Investment Under Uncertainty , 1993 .

[75]  Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie,et al.  Does Foreign Direct Investment Transfer Technology Across Borders? , 2001, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[76]  Chiara Criscuolo,et al.  Global Engagement and the Innovation Activities of Firms , 2005 .

[77]  A. Teixeira,et al.  Human capital intensity in technology-based firms located in Portugal: Does foreign ownership matter? , 2014 .

[78]  Lilach Nachum.  When Is Foreignness an Asset or a Liability? Explaining the Performance Differential Between Foreign and Local Firms , 2010 .

[79]  Jasjit Singh,et al.  Asymmetry of knowledge spillovers between MNCs and host country firms , 2006 .

[80]  Yama Temouri,et al.  Analysis of Productivity Differences among Foreign and Domestic Firms: Evidence from Germany , 2008 .

[81]  Does Inward Foreign Direct Investment Boost the Productivity of Domestic Firms , 2007 .

[82]  E. Strobl,et al.  Multinational Companies and Productivity Spillovers: A Meta‐Analysis , 2001 .

[83]  Guo Bin,et al.  Technology acquisition channels and industry performance: An industry-level analysis of Chinese large- and medium-size manufacturing enterprises , 2008 .