Scope-based carbon footprint analysis of U.S. residential and commercial buildings: An input–output hybrid life cycle assessment approach

Abstract Analyzing building related carbon emissions remains as one of the most increasing interests in sustainability research. While majority of carbon footprint studies addressing buildings differ in system boundaries, scopes, GHGs and methodology selected, the increasing number of carbon footprint reporting in response to legal and business demand paved the way for worldwide acceptance and adoption of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHG Protocol) set by the World Resources Institute (WRI) and World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). Current research is an important attempt to quantify the carbon footprint of the U.S. residential and commercial buildings in accordance with carbon accounting standards and Scopes set by WRI, in which all possible indirect emissions are also considered. Emissions through the construction, use, and disposal phases were calculated for the benchmark year 2002 by using a comprehensive hybrid economic input–output life cycle analysis. The results indicate that emissions from direct purchases of electricity (Scope 2) with 48% have the highest carbon footprint in the U.S. buildings. Indirect emissions (Scope 3) with 32% are greater than direct emissions (Scope 1) with 20.4%. Commuting is the most influential activity among the Scope 3 emissions with more than 10% of the carbon footprint of the U.S. buildings overall. Construction supply chain is another important contributor to the U.S. building's carbon footprint with 6% share. Use phase emissions are found to be the highest with 91% of the total emissions through all of the life cycle phases of the U.S. buildings.

[1]  Linda Reeder Leed for Homes , 2011 .

[2]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  CO2 Multipliers in Multi-region Input-Output Models , 2004 .

[3]  Somlanaré Romuald Kinda,et al.  Does Education matter for convergence in carbon dioxide per capita emissions , 2009 .

[4]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Errors in Conventional and Input‐Output—based Life—Cycle Inventories , 2000 .

[5]  Timo Busch,et al.  Corporate Carbon Performance Indicators , 2008 .

[6]  Luisa F. Cabeza,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review , 2014 .

[7]  J. S. Pandey,et al.  Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation , 2011, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[8]  Camilla Dunham Whitehead,et al.  National and Regional Water and Wastewater Rates For Use inCost-Benefit Models and Evaluations of Water Efficiency Programs , 2008 .

[9]  W. Leontief Environmental Repercussions and the Economic Structure: An Input-Output Approach , 1970 .

[10]  Anu Ramaswami,et al.  Greenhouse gas emission footprints and energy use benchmarks for eight U.S. cities. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Dewi Sulistyorini KUAT LENTUR PANEL PARTISI DARI LIMBAH STYROFOAM YANG DILAPISI KAWAT LOKET , 2015 .

[12]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  System boundary selection in life-cycle inventories using hybrid approaches. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  Justo Garcia Navarro,et al.  Assessment of the decrease of CO2 emissions in the construction field through the selection of materials: Practical case study of three houses of low environmental impact , 2006 .

[14]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Energy requirements of households in Brazil , 2005 .

[15]  Varun,et al.  Life cycle assessment of buildings: A review , 2011 .

[16]  Chris Hendrickson,et al.  Economic Input-output Life-cycle Assessment of U.S. Residential Buildings , 2002 .

[17]  Chris Hendrickson,et al.  Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Goods and Services: An Input-Output Approach , 2006 .

[18]  H Scott Matthews,et al.  Environmental effects of interstate power trading on electricity consumption mixes. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  P. Vitousek Beyond Global Warming: Ecology and Global Change , 1994 .

[20]  H Scott Matthews,et al.  Categorization of Scope 3 emissions for streamlined enterprise carbon footprinting. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  J. Minx,et al.  A definition of “carbon footprint” , 2010 .

[22]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF HOUSEHOLD CARBON FOOTPRINT REDUCTION POTENTIALS , 2010 .

[23]  Gregory A. Keoleian,et al.  Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implications , 2003 .

[24]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Cost premium prediction of certified green buildings: A neural network approach , 2011 .

[25]  Vincent R. Gray Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[26]  Seppo Junnila,et al.  Implications of urban structure on carbon consumption in metropolitan areas , 2011 .

[27]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[28]  H. S. Matthews,et al.  The importance of carbon footprint estimation boundaries. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  Daniel R. Rousse,et al.  Sustainable Buildings: An Ever Evolving Target , 2011 .

[30]  Sgouris Sgouridis,et al.  Rigorous classification and carbon accounting principles for low and Zero Carbon Cities , 2011 .

[31]  H. S. Matthews,et al.  THE ROLE OF INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS FOR THE SCREENING OF CORPORATE CARBON FOOTPRINTS , 2009 .

[32]  Seppo Junnila,et al.  A Longitudinal Study on the Carbon Emissions of a New Residential Development , 2011 .

[33]  Zong-ci Zhao,et al.  Climate change 2001, the scientific basis, chap. 8: model evaluation. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC , 2001 .

[34]  Bruce Lippke,et al.  Energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions related to the use, maintenance, and disposal of a residential structure. , 2005 .

[35]  A. Horvath,et al.  Life-Cycle Assessment of Office Buildings in Europe and the United States , 2006 .

[36]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Towards a triple bottom-line sustainability assessment of the U.S. construction industry , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[37]  End Use Annual energy review , 1984 .

[38]  E. Hertwich,et al.  Carbon footprint of nations: a global, trade-linked analysis. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[39]  B. Weidema,et al.  Carbon Footprint , 2008 .

[40]  Zhentang Guo,et al.  Carbon emissions in the life cycle of urban building system in China—A case study of residential buildings , 2011 .

[41]  Lei Xu,et al.  The life-cycle assessment of a single-storey retail building in Canada , 2012 .

[42]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[43]  Steven Blanchard,et al.  Life Cycle Analysis of a Residential Home in Michigan , 1998 .

[44]  Joe Marriott,et al.  Impact of Power Generation Mix on Life Cycle Assessment and Carbon Footprint Greenhouse Gas Results , 2010 .

[45]  Seppo Junnila,et al.  Situated lifestyles: I. How lifestyles change along with the level of urbanization and what the greenhouse gas implications are—a study of Finland , 2013 .

[46]  G. Peters Carbon footprints and embodied carbon at multiple scales , 2010 .

[47]  Paul Denholm,et al.  Role of Energy Storage with Renewable Electricity Generation , 2010 .

[48]  Seppo Junnila,et al.  A scenario analysis of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of a new residential area , 2012 .

[49]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[50]  A. Ramaswami,et al.  A demand-centered, hybrid life-cycle methodology for city-scale greenhouse gas inventories. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[51]  H. S. Matthews,et al.  Quantifying the global and distributional aspects of American household carbon footprint , 2008 .

[52]  Spencer R. Weart,et al.  The Discovery of Global Warming , 2008 .

[53]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Environmental impacts of the UK residential sector: Life cycle assessment of houses , 2012 .

[54]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  Sustainability Assessment of U.S. Construction Sectors: Ecosystems Perspective , 2012 .

[55]  Pooya Soltantabar Annual Energy Outlook , 2015 .