Insufficient incentives for investment in electricity generations

In theory, competitive electricity markets can provide incentives for efficient investment in generating capacity. We show that if consumers and investors are risk averse, investment is efficient only if investors in generating capacity can sign long-term contracts with consumers. Otherwise the uncovered price risk increases financing costs, reduces equilibrium investment levels, distorts technology choice towards less capital-intensive generation and reduces consumer utility. We observe insufficient levels of long-term contracts in existing markets, possibly because retail companies are not credible counter-parties if their final customer can switch easily. With consumer franchise, retailers can sign long-term contracts, but this solution comes at the expense of the idea of retail competition. Alternative capacity mechanisms to stimulate investment are discussed.

[1]  Investment Dynamics and Long Term Price Trends in Competitive Electricity Markets , 2001 .

[2]  Eric Hirst,et al.  Generation Adequacy: Who Decides? , 1999 .

[3]  H. Chao Peak Load Pricing and Capacity Planning with Demand and Supply Uncertainty , 1983 .

[4]  Andrew Ford,et al.  Cycles in competitive electricity markets: a simulation study of the western United States , 1999 .

[5]  Ralph Turvey Ensuring adequate generation capacity , 2003 .

[6]  Anne-Marie Pålsson,et al.  Does the degree of relative risk aversion vary with household characteristics , 1996 .

[7]  M. Kahal A REVIEW OF ISSUES CONCERNING ELECTRIC POWER CAPACITY MARKETS , 2001 .

[8]  Susan Tierney,et al.  The Political Economy of Long-Term Generation Adequacy: Why an ICAP Mechanism is Needed as Part of Standard Market Design , 2002 .

[9]  S. Borenstein,et al.  Investment Efficiency in Competitive Electricity Markets With and Without Time-Varying Retail Prices , 2002 .

[10]  Michael Caramanis Investment Decisions and Long-Term Planning Under Electricity Spot Pricing , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[11]  E. Kahn,et al.  A quantitative analysis of pricing behavior in California's wholesale electricity market during summer 2000 , 2001, 2001 Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37262).

[12]  David M Newbery,et al.  Regulatory Challenges to European Electricity Liberalisation , 2002 .

[13]  David M Newbery,et al.  Regulating electricity to ensure efficient competition , 2001 .

[14]  Simon Cowan UTILITY REGULATION AND INPUT PRICE RISK: THE ROLES OF MARGINAL COST PRICING AND FUTURES MARKETS , 2002 .

[15]  I. Pérez-Arriaga,et al.  A Market Approach to Long-Term Security of Supply , 2002, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[16]  S. Stoft Power System Economics: Designing Markets for Electricity , 2002 .

[17]  Stephen Littlechild,et al.  Wholesale Spot Price Pass-Through , 2003 .

[18]  Benjamin F. Hobbs,et al.  Installed Capacity Requirements and Price Caps: Oil on the Water, or Fuel on the Fire? , 2001 .

[19]  G. Shuttleworth Getting markets to clear , 1997 .

[20]  Simon Cowan Utility Regulation and Risk Allocation: The Roles of Marginal Cost Pricing and Futures Markets , 2002 .

[21]  A. Boom Investments in Electricity Generating Capacity Under Different Market Structures and with Endogenously Fixed Demand , 2003 .

[22]  R. Hakvoort,et al.  Market failure in generation investment? the dutch perspective , 2002 .

[23]  Chi-Keung Woo,et al.  Electricity market reform failures: UK, Norway, Alberta and California , 2003 .

[24]  Paul L. Joskow,et al.  Contributions to the Theory of Marginal Cost Pricing , 1976 .

[25]  G. Garrod,et al.  Electricity supply reliability: Estimating the value of lost load , 1997 .

[26]  M. Caramanis,et al.  Optimal Spot Pricing: Practice and Theory , 1982, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[27]  Shmuel S. Oren Ensuring Generation Adequacy in Competitive Electricity Markets , 2003 .

[28]  Richard Green,et al.  Retail Competition and Electricity Contracts , 2004 .