On the benefit of dimensional comparisons

People not only use social comparisons to evaluate their abilities, they also engage in dimensional comparisons, comparing their own achievement in different domains. Processes of dimensional comparison have contrasting effects on subject-specific self-concepts: downward dimensional comparisons result in higher self-concept in the intraindividually better domain, whereas upward dimensional comparisons result in lower self-concept in the intraindividually weaker domain. Two field studies and I experimental study were conducted to investigate whether the effects of downward or upward dimensional comparisons are stronger. In Study I (N = 319), downward dimensional comparisons proved to be stronger than upward dimensional comparisons. In Study 2 (N = 1349), the same pattern was found with reading test scores as well as grades as achievement indicators. In Study 3 (N = 81), the authors found larger effects for downward than for upward comparisons in both self-perceived competence and satisfaction with test outcomes in an experimental setting.

[1]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  The affective consequences of social comparison: either direction has its ups and downs. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  Richard J. Shavelson,et al.  Self-Concept: Its Multifaceted, Hierarchical Structure , 1985 .

[3]  B. Hannover.  Development of the Self in Gendered Contexts , 2000 .

[4]  W. N. Schoenfeld,et al.  Principles of Psychology , 2007 .

[5]  Thomas Eckes,et al.  The developmental social psychology of gender , 2000 .

[6]  Jörn R. Sparfeldt,et al.  Fachspezifische Selbstkonzepte und Schulleistungen im dimensionalen Vergleich : Eine versuchsplanerische Überprüfung des I/E-Modells , 2004 .

[7]  J. Eccles,et al.  Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[8]  Kit-Tai Hau,et al.  Extension of the Internal/External Frame of Reference Model of Self-Concept Formation: Importance of Native and Nonnative Languages for Chinese Students. , 2001 .

[9]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[10]  Patricio Cumsille,et al.  Methods for Handling Missing Data , 2003 .

[11]  Mimi Bong,et al.  Tests of the internal/external frames of reference model with subject-specific academic self-efficacy and frame-specific academic self-concepts. , 1998 .

[12]  Britta Pohlmann.  Konsequenzen dimensionaler Vergleiche , 2005 .

[13]  O. Köller,et al.  Dimensional comparisons: An experimental approach to the internal/external frame of reference model. , 2001 .

[14]  H. Marsh,et al.  A Meta-Analytic Path Analysis of the Internal/External Frame of Reference Model of Academic Achievement and Academic Self-Concept , 2009 .

[15]  Wayne F. Velicer,et al.  Research methods in psychology , 2003 .

[16]  Michael O. Martin,et al.  PIRLS 2006 Assessment Framework and Specifications: Progress in International Reading Literacy Study. , 2004 .

[17]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  J. Eccles.  Subjective Task Value and the Eccles et al. Model of Achievement-Related Choices. , 2005 .

[19]  Barbara M. Byrne,et al.  A Multifaceted Academic Self-Concept: Its Hierarchical Structure and Its Relation to Academic Achievement. , 1988 .

[20]  J. Möller,et al.  Internal comparisons in everyday life , 2006 .

[21]  P. Baltes,et al.  On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny. Selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[22]  H. Marsh.  Causal ordering of academic self-concept and academic achievement: A multiwave, longitudinal panel analysis. , 1990 .

[23]  Jens Möller,et al.  Frame of Reference Effects Following the Announcement of Exam Results. , 2001, Contemporary educational psychology.

[24]  H. Marsh.  Verbal and Math Self-Concepts: An Internal/External Frame of Reference Model , 1986 .

[25]  H. Stern,et al.  The use of multiple imputation for the analysis of missing data. , 2001, Psychological methods.

[26]  J. Schafer,et al.  Missing data: our view of the state of the art. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[27]  O. Köller,et al.  Spontaneous and reactive attributions following academic achievement , 2000 .