Molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 using a reagent-free approach

Shortage of reagents and consumables required for the extraction and molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in respiratory samples has led many laboratories to investigate alternative approaches for sample preparation. Fomsgaard et al 2020 recently presented results using heat-processing of respiratory samples prior to RT-qPCR as an economical method enabling an extremely fast streamlining of the processes at virtually no cost. Here, we present our results using this method and highlight some major pitfalls that diagnostics laboratories should be aware of before proceeding with this technique. We first investigated various treatments using different temperatures, incubation times and sample volumes based on the above study to optimise the heat-treatment conditions. Although the initial data confirmed the published results, further investigations revealed unexpected inhibitory properties of some commonly used virus transport media (VTMs) on some commercially available RT-qPCR mixes, emphasising the critical importance of a thorough validation process to determine the most adapted reagents to be used depending on the sample types to be tested. In conclusion, although the method works, with very consistent Ct values and an excellent sensitivity when compared to a conventional RNA extraction method, it is critical to include an internal control to check each sample for potential inhibition.

[1]  A. Nalla,et al.  Direct RT-qPCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA from patient nasopharyngeal swabs without an RNA extraction step , 2020, PLoS biology.

[2]  F. Balloux,et al.  Emergence of genomic diversity and recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, Infection, Genetics and Evolution.

[3]  R. González-Montelongo,et al.  Fast SARS-CoV-2 detection by RT-qPCR in preheated nasopharyngeal swab samples , 2020, International Journal of Infectious Diseases.

[4]  P. Grant,et al.  Extraction-free COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) diagnosis by RT-PCR to increase capacity for national testing programmes during a pandemic , 2020, bioRxiv.

[5]  A. Fomsgaard,et al.  An alternative workflow for molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 – escape from the NA extraction kit-shortage, Copenhagen, Denmark, March 2020 , 2020, medRxiv.

[6]  Scott Tighe,et al.  DIRECT RT-qPCR DETECTION OF SARS-CoV-2 RNA FROM PATIENT NASOPHARYNGEAL SWABS WITHOUT AN RNA EXTRACTION STEP , 2020, bioRxiv.

[7]  Dylan H. Morris,et al.  Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1 , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Xiang Li,et al.  On the origin and continuing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 , 2020, National science review.

[9]  E. Holmes,et al.  A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China , 2020, Nature.

[10]  Kai Zhao,et al.  A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin , 2020, Nature.

[11]  Y. Hu,et al.  Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China , 2020, The Lancet.

[12]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .