Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: tackling gross under-representation and recognition among talents in Geochemistry and Cosmochemistry

Diversity, at every step along the scientific path, drives innovative research. Scientific societies, like the Geochemical Society (GS) and the European Association of Geochemistry (EAG), have a significant influence on which innovators are celebrated. Such choices have the consequence of shaping the future of research, and so are responsible for the evolution of our discipline and its relationship to the global community. These professional bodies are uniquely positioned to define and promote the success of all scientists, including those from under-represented groups, through proactive advocacy, inclusive mentorship, awards, and leadership. At present, the only data available to examine the distribution of under-represented groups between memberships, awardees leadership are those of gender. To assess gender diversity in the geochemistry and cosmochemistry community, we thus introspectively review available records of GS and EAG membership through Goldschmidt Conference attendees, awardees, leadership, and editorial boards. This work identifies areas for growth and begins a dialogue about how the society and its members can work together to better reflect and progress our community. Our examination of the record spanning the last decade demonstrates that leadership positions, awards, and honors have continued to be disproportionately given to white men, to the exclusion of women. The GS and EAG have recently taken positive steps towards becoming more inclusive; however, much more work is needed. In order for both communities to become diverse, equitable and inclusive, where all scientists flourish, we offer suggestions for swift steps that the GS and EAG and their members can pursue. The suggested structural improvements will require ongoing analysis and reforms, which must be shared by all of us, to create a sustainable legacy that we can be proud of.

[1]  L. Birgenheier,et al.  Creating and Promoting Gender Equity and Diversity in Professional Geological Societies , 2021 .

[2]  O. Pourret,et al.  Uniting to Advance Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in a Pandemic and Post-Pandemic World , 2021 .

[3]  F. Piccoli,et al.  A report on gender diversity and equality in the geosciences: an analysis of the Swiss Geoscience Meetings from 2003 to 2019 , 2021, Swiss Journal of Geosciences.

[4]  C. Jackson,et al.  Ten Steps to Protect BIPOC Scholars in the Field , 2020 .

[5]  R. Mahon,et al.  "Enriching Lives within Sedimentary Geology": Actionable Recommendations for Making SEPM a Diverse, Equitable and Inclusive Society for All Sedimentary Geologists , 2020, The Sedimentary Record.

[6]  D. Chiarella,et al.  Fieldwork and disability: an overview for an inclusive experience , 2020, Geological Magazine.

[7]  Holly J. Niner,et al.  The pandemic push: can COVID-19 reinvent conferences to models rooted in sustainability, equitability and inclusion? , 2020, Socio-Ecological Practice Research.

[8]  B. Keisling,et al.  Black Lives Matter: Promoting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Geochemistry , 2020, Elements.

[9]  C. Atchison,et al.  “Nothing about us without us:” The perspectives of autistic geoscientists on inclusive instructional practices in geoscience education , 2020, Journal of Geoscience Education.

[10]  P. Bierman,et al.  First Authorship Gender Gap in the Geosciences , 2020, Earth and Space Science.

[11]  P. Bierman,et al.  Hands on geochemistry as a means to promote equality, diversity, and inclusion in geoscience , 2020 .

[12]  C. Perez,et al.  Invisible Women: Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men , 2020 .

[13]  R. Bell,et al.  Why Diversity Matters to AGU , 2019 .

[14]  A. Colman,et al.  Effects of Improved 17O Correction on Interlaboratory Agreement in Clumped Isotope Calibrations, Estimates of Mineral‐Specific Offsets, and Temperature Dependence of Acid Digestion Fractionation , 2019, Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems.

[15]  Virginia Gewin,et al.  Plugging the leaky pipeline for UK female chemists , 2018, Nature.

[16]  E. Cooperdock,et al.  No progress on diversity in 40 years , 2018, Nature Geoscience.

[17]  Bryce E. Hughes Coming out in STEM: Factors affecting retention of sexual minority STEM students , 2018, Science Advances.

[18]  J Alper,et al.  The Pipeline Is Leaking Women All the Way Along , 1993, Science.

[19]  S. Mukasa Underrepresentation of women and minority awardees in geoscience societies , 2009 .

[20]  G. Holton,et al.  Career Patterns of Women and Men in the Sciences , 1996 .