Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Constaninos P. Constantinou,et al. An Investigation of the Potential of Interactive Simulations for Developing System Thinking Skills in Elementary School: A case study with fifth‐graders and sixth‐graders , 2009 .
[2] M. Linn,et al. Assessing Knowledge Integration in Science: Construct, Measures, and Evidence , 2008 .
[3] Jean Simonneaux,et al. Socio-scientific reasoning influenced by identities , 2009 .
[4] David H. Jonassen,et al. Handbook of Research for educational Communications and Technology , 1997 .
[5] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Constructing Extended Inquiry Projects: Curriculum Materials for Science Education Reform , 2000 .
[6] Brian J. Reiser,et al. Making authentic practices accessible to learners: Design challenges and strategies , 2006 .
[7] Doris B. Ash. Reflective scientific sense‐making dialogue in two languages: The science in the dialogue and the dialogue in the science , 2004 .
[8] P. Duesberg,et al. HIV is not the cause of AIDS. , 1988, Science.
[9] H. Birx,et al. The Mismeasure of Man , 1981 .
[10] T. Tal. Learning about agriculture within the framework of education for sustainability , 2008 .
[11] Yael M. Bamberger,et al. Multiple Outcomes of Class Visits to Natural History Museums: The Students’ View , 2008 .
[12] Y. Dori,et al. Question-posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: Analysis of an environmental case study , 1999 .
[13] J. Osborne,et al. Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms , 2000 .
[14] Jonathan Osborne,et al. Science Education for the Future. , 1998 .
[15] Shirley Simon,et al. Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science , 2004 .
[16] Troy D. Sadler,et al. Advancing reflective judgment through Socioscientific Issues , 2009 .
[17] John Settlage,et al. Standards-based reform and its unintended consequences: Implications for science education within America's urban schools , 2002 .
[18] Svein Sjøberg,et al. Science education and youth's identity construction - two incompatible projects? , 2007 .
[19] S. Erduran,et al. Argumentation in Science Education: An Overview , 2007 .
[20] S. Toulmin. The uses of argument , 1960 .
[21] D. Zeidler,et al. Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas , 2002 .
[22] Eduardo Fleury Mortimer,et al. Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms , 2003 .
[23] R. Sawyer. The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: Introduction , 2014 .
[24] Revital T. Tal,et al. Assessing high order thinking of students participating in the “wise” project in Israel , 2003 .
[25] R. Herrnstein,et al. The Bell Curve , 1994 .
[26] Beryl Lieff Benderly,et al. Rising Above "The Gathering Storm" , 2007 .
[27] Judith Bennett,et al. Bringing science to life: A synthesis of the research evidence on the effects of context‐based and STS approaches to science teaching , 2007 .
[28] M. Jiménez-Aleixandre,et al. Argument in High School Genetics. , 1997 .
[29] Roy D. Pea,et al. The Collaboratory Notebook , 1996, CACM.
[30] Daniel T. Hickey,et al. Theory, level, and function: Three dimensions for understanding the connections between transfer and student assessment , 2005 .
[31] David R. Olson,et al. The Handbook of Education and Human Development , 1998 .
[32] N. Vanselow,et al. IOM report: Improving Medical Education--Enhancing the Behavioral and Social Science Content of Medical School Curricula. , 2006, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
[33] B. Wynne,et al. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. , 1994 .
[34] S. Barab,et al. Relating Narrative, Inquiry, and Inscriptions: Supporting Consequential Play , 2007 .
[35] Norman Campbell,et al. What is Science , 1953 .
[36] J. Osborne,et al. The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science , 1999 .
[37] Troy D. Sadler,et al. Situated learning in science education: socio‐scientific issues as contexts for practice , 2009 .
[38] Dana L. Zeidler,et al. The Role of Moral Reasoning and the Status of Socioscientific Issues in Science Education , 2003 .
[39] P. Towndrow,et al. Identity and agency in science education: reflections from the far side of the world , 2008 .
[40] J. Greeno. THE SITUATIVITY OF KNOWING, LEARNING, AND RESEARCH , 1998 .
[41] Bhw Yung,et al. A blow to a decade of effort on promoting teaching of nature of science , 2010 .
[42] Shirley Simon,et al. Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom , 2006 .
[43] Rola Khishfe,et al. Influence of Explicit and Reflective versus Implicit Inquiry-Oriented Instruction on Sixth Graders' Views of Nature of Science. , 2002 .
[44] Nir Orion,et al. A Model for the Development and Implementation of Field Trips as an Integral Part of the Science Curriculum. , 1993 .
[45] Anat Zohar,et al. Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics , 2002 .
[46] Thomas L. Good,et al. International handbook of teachers and teaching , 1997 .
[47] Toni M. Kempler,et al. The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: Motivation and Cognitive Engagement in Learning Environments , 2005 .
[48] R. Duschl,et al. "Doing the Lesson" or "Doing Science": Argument in High School Genetics , 2000 .
[49] Stuart Naylor,et al. Argumentation and Primary Science , 2007 .
[50] Chin-Chung Tsai. A science teacher's reflections and knowledge growth about STS instruction after actual implementation , 2002 .
[51] G. E. Berrios,et al. . New York: Cambridge , 2000 .
[52] K. T. Boersma,et al. Design criteria for learning and teaching genetics , 2005 .
[53] W. Sandoval,et al. Explanation-Driven Inquiry: Integrating Conceptual and Epistemic Scaffolds for Scientific Inquiry , 2004 .
[54] T. Tal,et al. Environmental projects of Jewish and Arab youth in Israel: the adult leaders’ views , 2011 .
[55] Douglas B. Clark,et al. Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions , 2008 .
[56] K. Crowley,et al. Learning conversations in museums , 2002 .
[57] J. Creswell. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .
[58] Ruth Ellen Bulger,et al. The Institute of Medicine , 1992, JAMA.
[59] W. Blattner,et al. HIV causes AIDS. , 1988, Science.
[60] William A. Sandoval,et al. Conceptual and Epistemic Aspects of Students' Scientific Explanations , 2003 .
[61] S. Rodrigues. Pupil‐appropriate contexts in science lessons: the relationship between themes, purpose and dialogue , 2006 .
[62] M. Jiménez-Aleixandre,et al. Knowledge producers or knowledge consumers? Argumentation and decision making about environmental management , 2002 .
[63] Angela Calabrese Barton,et al. Rethinking Scientific Literacy , 2004 .
[64] Marcia B. Baxter Magolda. Creating Contexts for Learning and Self-Authorship: Constructive-Developmental Pedagogy. Vanderbilt Issues in Higher Education. , 1999 .
[65] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Middle school students’ use of appropriate and inappropriate evidence in writing scientific explanations , 2012 .
[66] Troy D. Sadler,et al. Socioscience and Ethics in Science Classrooms: Teacher Perspectives and Strategies. , 2006 .
[67] Julie Bianchini,et al. Learning to teach science in contemporary and equitable ways: The successes and struggles of first‐year science teachers , 2003 .
[68] F. Tödtling,et al. One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach , 2005 .
[69] J. Klein,et al. Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory, and Practice. , 1991 .
[70] Eleanor Dantzler Siebert,et al. College Pathways to the Science Education Standards , 2001 .
[71] R. Yager. Science/Technology/Society as Reform in Science Education. , 1996 .
[72] L. Bachmann,et al. Colonoscopy screening markedly reduces the occurrence of colon carcinomas and carcinoma-related death: a closed cohort study. , 2012, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.
[73] G. Aikenhead,et al. BOOK REVIEW , 2008 .
[74] George M. Bodner,et al. The beginning science teacher: Classroom narratives of convictions and constraints , 1992 .
[75] Stephen P. Norris,et al. How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy , 2003 .
[76] R. Dawkins. The selfish gene, 30th anniversary ed. , 2006 .
[77] Anat Yarden,et al. Learning genetics through an authentic research simulation in bioinformatics , 2006 .
[78] Brian J. Reiser,et al. Reasoning across Ontologically Distinct Levels: Students' Understandings of Molecular Genetics. , 2007 .
[79] D. Hodson,et al. Turning Crisis into Opportunity: Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry as Illustrated in the Scientific Research on Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , 2007, Science & education.
[81] B. Brown,et al. Double Talk: Synthesizing Everyday and Science Language in the Classroom. , 2008 .
[82] Jonathan Osborne,et al. Improving science education : the contribution of research , 2000 .
[83] Stuart O. Yager,et al. The Advantages of an STS Approach over a Typical Textbook Dominated Approach in Middle School Science. , 2006 .
[84] J. Dillon,et al. The value of outdoor learning: evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere , 2006 .
[85] J. DeWitt,et al. A Short Review of School Field Trips: Key Findings from the Past and Implications for the Future , 2008 .
[86] Randy L. Bell,et al. Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues , 2003 .
[87] Louise J. Johnson,et al. Environmental epigenetics , 2010, Heredity.
[88] Troy D. Sadler,et al. The Significance of Content Knowledge for Informal Reasoning regarding Socioscientific Issues: Applying Genetics Knowledge to Genetic Engineering Issues. , 2005 .
[89] Dana L. Zeidler,et al. The Role of Moral Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues and Discourse in Science Education , 2003 .
[90] L. Dee Fink,et al. Team-Based Learning: A Transformative Use of Small Groups in College Teaching , 2002 .
[91] Richard A. Duschl,et al. Quality Argumentation and Epistemic Criteria , 2007 .
[92] B. Rogoff. The Cultural Nature of Human Development , 2003 .
[93] D. Kuhn. Science as argument : Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking , 1993 .
[94] H. Schweingruber,et al. TAKING SCIENCE TO SCHOOL: LEARNING AND TEACHING SCIENCE IN GRADES K-8 , 2007 .
[95] J. Cohen. The Duesberg phenomenon. , 1994, Science.
[96] A. Giddens. The consequences of modernity , 1990 .
[97] O. R. Anderson,et al. Senior high school students' preference and reasoning modes about nuclear energy use , 2003 .
[98] A. Gore. An Inconvenient Truth: The Planetary Emergency of Global Warming and What We Can Do About It , 2006 .
[99] George E. DeBoer,et al. A history of ideas in science education : implications for practice , 1992 .
[100] Kenneth Tobin,et al. Beliefs about the Nature of Science and the Enacted Science Curriculum , 1997 .
[101] Fernando Cajas. Public understanding of science: using technology to enhance school science in everyday life , 1999 .
[102] Grady Venville,et al. The impact of a classroom intervention on grade 10 students' argumentation skills, informal reasoning, and conceptual understanding of science , 2010 .
[103] Sibel Erduran,et al. Argumentation in Science Education: Perspectives from Classroom-Based Research , 2007 .
[104] V. Albe,et al. When Scientific Knowledge, Daily Life Experience, Epistemological and Social Considerations Intersect: Students’ Argumentation in Group Discussions on a Socio-scientific Issue , 2008 .
[105] Etienne Wenger,et al. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .
[106] Anat Zohar,et al. Higher Order Thinking in Science Classrooms: Students' Learning and Teachers' Professional Development , 2012 .
[107] Joan Solomon,et al. Science Education for the Public Understanding of Science , 1999 .
[108] Troy D. Sadler,et al. Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research , 2004 .
[109] M. Pressley,et al. Discourse Patterns and Collaborative Scientific Reasoning in Peer and Teacher-Guided Discussions , 1999 .
[110] Charlene M. Czerniak,et al. Science Teacher Beliefs and Intentions to Implement Science-Technology-Society (STS) in the Classroom , 1998 .
[111] Veronica Boix Mansilla,et al. Targeted Assessment of Students' Interdisciplinary Work: An Empirically Grounded Framework Proposed , 2007 .
[112] D. Hodson. Time for action: Science education for an alternative future , 2003 .
[113] Shirley Simon,et al. Enhancing the quality of argument in school science , 2001 .
[114] Miguel Nussbaum,et al. A constructivist mobile learning environment supported by a wireless handheld network , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..
[115] Norman G. Lederman. Teachers' Understanding of the Nature of Science and Classroom Practice: Factors That Facilitate or Impede the Relationship. , 1999 .
[116] Shirley Simon,et al. Ideas, Evidence and Argument in Science , 2004 .
[117] D. Kuhn. THE SKILLS OF ARGUMENT , 2008, Education for Thinking.
[118] Marcia C. Linn,et al. Internet Environments for Science Education , 2004 .
[119] D. Perkins,et al. TEACHING FOR UNDERSTANDING , 1993 .
[120] Yael Kali,et al. Effect of Knowledge Integration Activities on Students' Perception of the Earth's Crust as a Cyclic System , 2003 .
[121] Kenneth Tobin,et al. Second international handbook of science education , 2012 .
[122] Marcus Grace,et al. Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues , 2004 .
[123] Troy D. Sadler,et al. Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education , 2009 .
[124] R. Herrnstein,et al. The bell curve : intelligence and class structure in American life , 1995 .
[125] Shirley Simon,et al. Argumentation in School Science: Breaking the Tradition of Authoritative Exposition Through a Pedagogy that Promotes Discussion and Reasoning , 2009 .
[126] F. Rhodes. Rules of the Game , 1997, Science.
[127] María Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre,et al. Designing Argumentation Learning Environments , 2007 .
[128] Ravit Golan Duncan,et al. A Learning Progression for Deepening Students' Understandings of Modern Genetics across the 5th-10th Grades. , 2009 .
[129] N. Orion,et al. Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education , 2005 .
[130] John W. Creswell,et al. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .
[131] Richard C Lewontin,et al. Biology as Ideology: The Doctrine of DNA , 1991 .
[132] Hilary Hollingsworth,et al. Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth , 2002 .
[133] Stein Dankert Kolstø,et al. 'To trust or not to trust,…'-pupils' ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientific issue , 2001 .
[134] John F. Disinger,et al. Environmental education research news , 1984 .
[135] Marcus Grace,et al. Developing High Quality Decision‐Making Discussions About Biological Conservation in a Normal Classroom Setting , 2009 .
[136] Jonathan Osborne,et al. Science Education for the Twenty First Century , 2007 .
[137] Rola Khishfe,et al. Teaching Nature of Science within a Controversial Topic: Integrated versus Nonintegrated. , 2006 .
[138] J. Shea. National Science Education Standards , 1995 .
[139] Andrée Tiberghien,et al. Design‐based Research: Case of a teaching sequence on mechanics , 2009 .
[140] Jenny M. Lewis,et al. Traits, genes, particles and information: re‐visiting students’ understandings of genetics , 2004 .
[141] Léonie J. Rennie,et al. Using visits to interactive science and technology centers, museums, aquaria, and zoos to promote learning in science , 1995 .
[142] L. Shulman. Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .
[143] A. Agresti,et al. Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences , 1979 .
[144] Leema K. Berland,et al. Making sense of argumentation and explanation , 2009 .
[145] John Leach,et al. Discussion of Socio‐scientific Issues: The role of science knowledge , 2006 .
[146] Derek Hodson,et al. Teaching and learning science : towards a personalized approach , 1998 .
[147] Norman G. Lederman,et al. Handbook of Research on Science Education , 2023 .
[148] Yael Kali,et al. Technology-Enhanced Support Strategies for Inquiry Learning , 2007 .
[149] W. Dunlap,et al. Meta-Analysis of Experiments With Matched Groups or Repeated Measures Designs , 1996 .
[150] Angela Calabrese Barton,et al. Teaching Science with Homeless Children: Pedagogy, Representation, and Identity. , 1998 .
[151] Doris Ash. Negotiations of Thematic Conversations About Biology , 2003 .
[152] W. G. Perry. Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1970 .
[153] Avi Hofstein,et al. Factors that influence learning during a scientific field trip in a natural environment , 1994 .
[154] Mary Ratcliffe,et al. Teaching for understanding of science in context: Evidence from the pilot trials of the Twenty First Century Science courses , 2009 .
[155] J. Ryder. School science education for citizenship: Strategies for teaching about the epistemology of science , 2002 .
[156] Sharan B. Merriam,et al. Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .
[157] Daniel T. Hickey,et al. Balancing varied assessment functions to attain systemic validity: Three is the magic number , 2006 .
[158] Joseph Krajcik,et al. Supporting Students' Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds in Instructional Materials , 2006 .
[159] T. Sadler,et al. Exploring the Sociopolitical Dimensions of Global Warming , 2009 .
[160] Angela Calabrese Barton,et al. Teaching science for social justice , 2003 .
[161] Daniel D. Suthers,et al. Effects of alternate representations of evidential relations on collaborative learning discourse , 1999, CSCL.
[162] D. Hodson. Why We Should Prioritize Learning about Science , 2006 .
[163] P. Cobb,et al. Cognitive and Situated Learning Perspectives in Theory and Practice , 1999 .
[164] D. Kuhn. Education for Thinking , 1986, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.
[165] M. Jiménez-Aleixandre,et al. Argumentation, Evidence Evaluation and Critical Thinking , 2012 .
[166] M. Berkowitz,et al. Integrating Science Education and Character Education , 2003 .
[167] Marcia C. Linn,et al. The Knowledge Integration Perspective on Learning and Instruction , 2005 .
[168] Yael Kali,et al. Collaborative knowledge building using the Design Principles Database , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..
[169] T. Bryce,et al. Tough acts to follow: the challenges to science teachers presented by biotechnological progress , 2004 .
[170] Randy L. Bell,et al. The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural , 1998 .
[171] Bob Campbell,et al. Talking Science: The research evidence on the use of small group discussions in science teaching , 2010 .
[172] G. Aikenhead. Towards a Cultural View on Quality Science Teaching , 2011 .
[173] Chi-Yan Tsui,et al. Understanding Genetics: Analysis of Secondary Students' Conceptual Status. , 2007 .
[174] B. Blunden. It’s the Nature of the Beast , 2004 .
[175] Jo Kwong,et al. Environmental Education , 1997 .
[176] Benny Hin Wai Yung,et al. Turning Crisis into Opportunity: Enhancing student‐teachers’ understanding of nature of science and scientific inquiry through a case study of the scientific research in severe acute respiratory syndrome , 2008 .
[177] Jennifer A. Fredricks,et al. Inquiry in Project-Based Science Classrooms: Initial Attempts by Middle School Students , 1998 .
[178] K. Kitchener,et al. Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series and Jossey-Bass Social and Behavioral Science Series. , 2009 .
[179] M. Linn,et al. Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE , 2000 .
[180] Stein DankerT. Kolstoe. Consensus projects: teaching science for citizenship , 2000 .
[181] Norman G. Lederman. Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research , 1992 .
[182] Troy D. Sadler,et al. Beyond STS: A research‐based framework for socioscientific issues education , 2005 .
[183] Gustav Helldén,et al. A Longitudinal Study Showing how Students use a Molecule Concept when Explaining Everyday Situations , 2009 .
[184] Troy D. Sadler,et al. Socioscientific Argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality , 2006 .
[185] Susan M. Williams,et al. Putting Case-Based Instruction Into Context: Examples From Legal and Medical Education , 1992 .
[186] James A. Stewart,et al. Student problem solving in high school genetics , 1983 .
[187] M. F. Tasar,et al. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education , 2008 .
[188] Robin Millar,et al. Twenty First Century Science: Insights from the Design and Implementation of a Scientific Literacy Approach in School Science , 2006 .
[189] Troy D. Sadler,et al. The Role of Moral Reasoning in Argumentation: Conscience, Character, and Care , 2007 .
[190] Marie-Claire Shanahan,et al. Identity in science learning: exploring the attention given to agency and structure in studies of identity , 2009 .
[191] Anselm L. Strauss,et al. Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .
[192] D. Potari,et al. Students' Argumentation in Decision-Making on a Socio-Scientific Issue: Implications for Teaching. , 1999 .
[193] A. Douglas,et al. Valuable Lessons: Engaging with the Social Context of Science in schools , 2001 .
[194] Gwyneth Hughes,et al. Marginalization of Socioscientific Material in Science–Technology–Society Science Curricula: Some Implications for Gender Inclusivity and Curriculum Reform , 2000 .
[195] Philip Bell,et al. Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education , 2008 .
[196] Grady Venville,et al. Searching for clarity to teach the complexity of the gene concept , 2005 .
[197] Gabrielle McSharry,et al. Role-play in science teaching and learning , 2000 .
[198] Peter A. Rubba,et al. Examination of preservice and in‐service secondary science teachers' beliefs about science‐technology‐society interactions , 1993 .
[199] S. Simon,et al. Mapping Children’s Discussions of Evidence in Science to Assess Collaboration and Argumentation , 2006 .
[200] A. Collins,et al. Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .
[201] Richard A. Duschl,et al. Restructuring Science Education: The Importance of Theories and Their Development , 1990 .
[202] N. Brickhouse,et al. Embodying science: A feminist perspective on learning , 2001 .
[203] P. Lachenbruch. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .
[204] J. Mestre. Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective , 2005 .
[205] J. Falk,et al. Learning from Museums: Visitor Experiences and the Making of Meaning , 2000 .
[206] S. Erduran,et al. TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse , 2004 .
[207] M. Jiménez-Aleixandre,et al. Justification and Persuasion about Cloning: Arguments in Hwang’s Paper and Journalistic Reported Versions , 2009 .
[208] Erminia Pedretti,et al. Decision Making and STS Education: Exploring Scientific Knowledge and Social Responsibility in Schools and Science Centers Through an Issues-Based Approach , 1999 .
[209] Anders Isnes,et al. Science students' critical examination of scientific information related to socioscientific issues , 2006 .
[210] Heidi B. Carlone,et al. The Cultural Production of Science in Reform-based Physics: Girls’ Access, Participation, and Resistance , 2004 .
[211] Tali Tal,et al. Teaching socioscientific issues: classroom culture and students’ performances , 2007 .