Barriers to implementing cardiovascular risk tables in routine general practice

Design Qualitative study. GPs were interviewed after analysing two audiotaped cardiovascular consultations. Setting Primary health care. Subjects A sample of 15 GPs who audiotaped 22 consultations. Main outcome measures Barriers hampering GPs from following the guideline. Results Data saturation was reached after about 13 interviews. The 25 identified barriers were related to the risk table, the GP or to environmental factors. Lack of knowledge and poor communication skills of the GP, along with pressure of work and demanding patients, cause GPs to deviate from the guideline. GPs regard barriers external to themselves as most important. Conclusion Using the risk table as a key element of the high-risk approach in primary prevention encounters many barriers. Merely incorporating risk tables in guidelines is not sufficient for implementation of the guidelines. Time-efficient implementation strategies dealing in particular with the communication and presentation of cardiovascular risk are needed.

[1]  J. Norrie,et al.  Risk assessment in primary prevention of coronary heart disease: randomised comparison of three scoring methods , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[2]  Joint British recommendations on prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice: summary , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  S M Grundy,et al.  Assessment of cardiovascular risk by use of multiple-risk-factor assessment equations: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. , 1999, Circulation.

[4]  R. Jackson,et al.  Updated New Zealand cardiovascular disease risk-benefit prediction guide , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  C. Naylor,et al.  Using disease risk estimates to guide risk factor interventions: field test of a patient workbook for self‐assessing coronary risk , 2002, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[6]  I. U. Haq,et al.  Coronary and cardiovascular risk estimation for primary prevention:validation of a new Sheffield table in the 1995 Scottish health survey population , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[7]  K. Sweeney,et al.  Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  Philip Greenland,et al.  Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk by Use of Multiple-Risk-Factor Assessment Equations , 1999 .

[9]  R. Grol,et al.  Barriers to preventive care in general practice: the role of organizational and attitudinal factors. , 1997, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[10]  A. Jadad,et al.  Enhancing prevention in primary care: are interventions targeted towards consumers’ and providers’ perceived needs? , 2000, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[11]  Tom Fahey,et al.  Evaluation of computer based clinical decision support system and risk chart for management of hypertension in primary care: randomised controlled trial , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[12]  Katrina M. Krause,et al.  Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? , 2003, American journal of public health.

[13]  T. Fahey,et al.  How accurately do primary health care professionals use cardiovascular risk tables in the management of hypertension? , 1999, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[14]  I. U. Haq,et al.  Is the Framingham risk function valid for northern European populations? A comparison of methods for estimating absolute coronary risk in high risk men , 1999, Heart.

[15]  C. van Weel,et al.  Relationship between practice organization and cardiovascular risk factor recording in general practice. , 1998, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[16]  Robert M Hamm,et al.  Measuring academic production. , 2002, Family medicine.

[17]  J. Ely,et al.  The effect of physician characteristics on compliance with adult preventive care guidelines. , 1998, Family medicine.

[18]  P. Nilsson,et al.  A matter of heart: the general practitioner consultation in an evidence-based world , 2003, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[19]  J. Skolbekken,et al.  Communicating the risk reduction achieved by cholesterol reducing drugs , 1998, BMJ.

[20]  P. Poole‐Wilson,et al.  Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice , 1994 .

[21]  G. Huby,et al.  From trial data to practical knowledge: qualitative study of how general practitioners have accessed and used evidence about statin drugs in their management of hypercholesterolaemia , 1998, BMJ.

[22]  T. Marteau,et al.  Screening for cardiovascular risk: public health imperative or matter for individual informed choice? , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[23]  G. Mancia,et al.  Prevention of coronary heart disease in clinical practice: recommendations of the Second Joint Task Force of European and other Societies on Coronary Prevention. , 1998, Atherosclerosis.