Reconsidering Power in Multistakeholder Relationship Management

Multistakeholder issue networks have been characterized as power-free, egalitarian forms of corporate–civil society engagement. Using a communication-centered conceptualization of power, our study finds that potential sources of power subtly manifest through communication and interaction patterns in multistakeholder issue networks. Our results indicate that organizations’ institutional status and resources are significant predictors of network power.

[1]  Roger V. Gould,et al.  Structures of Mediation: A Formal Approach to Brokerage in Transaction Networks , 1989 .

[2]  J. Lozano,et al.  The Role of NGOs in CSR: Mutual Perceptions Among Stakeholders , 2009 .

[3]  P. Brønn Adapting the PZB service quality model to reputation risk analysis and the implications for CSR communication , 2012 .

[4]  R. Gulati,et al.  Dependence Asymmetry and Joint Dependence in Interorganizational Relationships: Effects of Embeddedness on a Manufacturer's Performance in Procurement Relationships , 2007 .

[5]  A. Spicer,et al.  The Politics of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives: The Crisis of the Forest Stewardship Council , 2015 .

[6]  R. Hanneman Introduction to Social Network Methods , 2001 .

[7]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[8]  M. L. Ber,et al.  TOWARDS A CRITICAL THEORY OF VALUE CREATION IN CROSS-SECTOR PARTNERSHIPS. , 2010 .

[9]  Michael Cox,et al.  Power in Global Governance , 2005 .

[10]  Barbara Parker,et al.  Cross-Sector Partnerships to Address Social Issues: Challenges to Theory and Practice , 2005 .

[11]  Julia Roloff,et al.  Learning from Multi-Stakeholder Networks: Issue-Focussed Stakeholder Management , 2008 .

[12]  E. Cheyns Multi-stakeholder initiatives for sustainable agriculture : limits of the 'Inclusiveness' paradigm , 2011 .

[13]  Edward T. Palazzolo,et al.  Exponential Random Graph (p*) Models as a Method for Social Network Analysis in Communication Research , 2010 .

[14]  Ning Wang,et al.  Networked discontent: The anatomy of protest campaigns in social media , 2016, Soc. Networks.

[15]  R. Schmidpeter,et al.  Corporate social responsibility across Europe , 2005 .

[16]  Tim Rowley Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences , 1997 .

[17]  Andreas Rasche,et al.  Global Policies and Local Practice: Loose and Tight Couplings in Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives , 2012, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[18]  Luciano Rossoni,et al.  Models and methods in social network analysis , 2006 .

[19]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Theories of Communication Networks , 2003 .

[20]  P. Cunningham,et al.  The Emergence of Corporate Social Responsibility in Chile: The Importance of Authenticity and Social Networks , 2009 .

[21]  Giuseppe Labianca,et al.  Power in Politically Charged Networks , 2012, Soc. Networks.

[22]  D. Mumby Organizational Communication: A Critical Approach , 2012 .

[23]  Marya L. Doerfel,et al.  Network dynamics of interorganizational cooperation: the Croatian civil society movement , 2004 .

[24]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Analyzing social networks , 2013 .

[25]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  The Coevolution of Multiplex Communication Networks in Organizational Communities , 2011 .

[26]  K. Bäckstrand Multi-Stakeholder Partnerships for Sustainable Development: Rethinking Legitimacy, Accountability and Effectiveness , 2006 .

[27]  M. Castells Communication Power: Mass Communication, Mass Self-Communication and Power Relationships in the Network Society , 2009, Media and Society.

[28]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[29]  R. Burt Structural Holes versus Network Closure as Social Capital , 2001 .

[30]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[31]  Manuel Castells,et al.  Network Theory| A Network Theory of Power , 2011 .

[32]  S. Hajkowicz Supporting multi-stakeholder environmental decisions. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[33]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[34]  B. Loasby The External Control of Organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective , 1979 .

[35]  Frans Prenkert,et al.  The dynamics of networked power in a concentrated business network , 2014 .

[36]  Michelle Shumate,et al.  Connective collective action online: An examination of the hyperlink network structure of an NGO issue network , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[37]  K. Cook,et al.  Social Exchange Theory , 1989, Theoretical Sociology.

[38]  R. D'amico Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison , 1978, Telos.

[39]  A. Yang When Transnational Civil Network Meets Local Context: An Exploratory Hyperlink Network Analysis of Northern/Southern NGOs' Virtual Network in China , 2013 .

[40]  Duygu Turker Analyzing relational sources of power at the interorganizational communication system , 2014 .

[41]  N. Tredell,et al.  Critical Theory and Postmodernism , 2003 .

[42]  M. Billingsley,et al.  Organizing for Power , 1983, The Nurse practitioner.

[43]  Yannick C. Atouba,et al.  Interorganizational Networking Patterns Among Development Organizations , 2010 .

[44]  Aimei Yang,et al.  Looking Over, Looking Out, and Moving Forward: Positioning Public Relations in Theorizing Organizational Network Ecologies , 2015 .

[45]  Michelle Shumate,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration Explored Through the Bona Fide Network Perspective , 2012 .