A modular approach to addressing model design, scale, and parameter estimation issues in distributed hydrological modelling

A modular approach to model design and construction provides a flexible framework in which to focus the multidisciplinary research and operational efforts needed to facilitate the development, selection, and application of the most robust distributed modelling methods. A variety of modular approaches have been developed, but with little consideration for compatibility among systems and concepts. Several systems are proprietary, limiting any user interaction. The US Geological Survey modular modelling system (MMS) is a modular modelling framework that uses an open source software approach to enable all members of the scientific community to address collaboratively the many complex issues associated with the design, development, and application of distributed hydrological and environmental models. Implementation of a common modular concept is not a trivial task. However, it brings the resources of a larger community to bear on the problems of distributed modelling, provides a framework in which to compare alternative modelling approaches objectively, and provides a means of sharing the latest modelling advances. The concepts and components of the MMS are described and an example application of the MMS, in a decision-support system context, is presented to demonstrate current system capabilities.

[1]  Eric A. Anderson,et al.  National Weather Service river forecast system: snow accumulation and ablation model , 1973 .

[2]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization , 1993 .

[3]  Gerald N. Day,et al.  Extended Streamflow Forecasting Using NWSRFS , 1985 .

[4]  H. H. Rosenbrock,et al.  An Automatic Method for Finding the Greatest or Least Value of a Function , 1960, Comput. J..

[5]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Multi-objective global optimization for hydrologic models , 1998 .

[6]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  A framework for development and application of hydrological models , 2001, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences.

[7]  L. Hay,et al.  A comparison of downscaled and raw GCM output: implications for climate change scenarios in the San Juan River basin, Colorado , 1999 .

[8]  George H. Leavesley,et al.  The Modular Modeling System (MMS): User's Manual , 1996 .

[9]  Basil Acock,et al.  Modularity and genericness in plant and ecosystem models , 1997 .

[10]  H. E. Jobson.  Users manual for an open-channel streamflow model based on the diffusion analogy , 1989 .

[11]  Chris DiBona,et al.  Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution , 1999 .

[12]  S. L. Markstrom,et al.  The modular modeling system (MMS) — The physical process modeling component of a database-centered decision support system for water and power management , 1996 .

[13]  G. H. Leavesley,et al.  Precipitation-runoff modeling system; user's manual , 1983 .

[14]  George H. Leavesley,et al.  A Community Hydrometeorology Laboratory for Fostering Collaborative Research by the Atmospheric and Hydrologic Sciences , 2000 .

[15]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  An introduction to the European Hydrological System — Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, “SHE”, 2: Structure of a physically-based, distributed modelling system , 1986 .

[16]  Vijay P. Singh,et al.  The Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System - PRMS. , 1995 .

[17]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[18]  L. Hay,et al.  A COMPARISON OF DELTA CHANGE AND DOWNSCALED GCM SCENARIOS FOR THREE MOUNTAINOUS BASINS IN THE UNITED STATES 1 , 2000 .

[19]  P. E. O'connell,et al.  An introduction to the European Hydrological System — Systeme Hydrologique Europeen, “SHE”, 1: History and philosophy of a physically-based, distributed modelling system , 1986 .