Tachycardia control in septic shock with esmolol and ivabradine: a comparison on heart function

Persisting tachycardia is often observed in resuscitated septic shock patients, and it is an independent risk factor for increased mortality. Recently, several drugs, such as esmolol and ivabradine, have been proved to be beneficial in HR control, but their overall impact on cardiac functions needs further investigation. The aim of this study is to study the effects of the two drugs on heart function in a protocol of polymicrobial septic shock and resuscitation. Twelve pigs were divided into three experimental groups: the esmolol-treated group (n=4), the ivabradine-treated group (n=5) and the control group (n=3). Cardiac autonomic activity was estimated by heart rate variability (HRV) indices and baroreflex sensitivity (BRS). The Buckberg index was adopted to evaluate myocardial oxygenation efficiency. Septic shock induced a severe autonomic dysfunction and a lower cardiac efficiency, not resolved by fluids resuscitation. The administration of the drugs improved both the HRV and the BRS, but this favourable condition was preserved after noradrenaline administration only in the esmolol group. The interaction of esmolol with the autonomic system is beneficial in septic shock to restore an improved condition of HRV and control, while ivabradine is not as effective when administered in adjunction to noradrenaline.

[1]  Giuseppe Baselli,et al.  A Mathematical Model of dP/dt Max for the Evaluation of the Dynamic Control of Heart Contractility in Septic Shock , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  A. Wienke,et al.  Reducing Elevated Heart Rates in Patients with Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome with The If (Funny Channel Current) Inhibitor Ivabradine , 2017, Shock.

[3]  Douglas E. Lake,et al.  Improved entropy rate estimation in physiological data , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  If Channel Inhibition With Ivabradine Does Not Improve Cardiac and Vascular Function in Experimental Septic Shock , 2016, Shock.

[5]  K. Tracey,et al.  Vagus nerve stimulation attenuates the systemic inflammatory response to endotoxin , 2000, Nature.

[6]  G. Baselli,et al.  Blood pressure variability, heart functionality, and left ventricular tissue alterations in a protocol of severe hemorrhagic shock and resuscitation , 2018, Journal of applied physiology.

[7]  G. Baselli,et al.  The possible role of the vagal nervous system in the recovery of the blood pressure control after cardiac arrest: a porcine model study , 2017, Physiological measurement.

[8]  J. Chvojka,et al.  Heart Rate Variability in Porcine Progressive Peritonitis-Induced Sepsis , 2016, Front. Physiol..

[9]  D. Annane,et al.  Esmolol indirectly stimulates vagal nerve activity in endotoxemic pigs , 2018, Intensive Care Medicine Experimental.

[10]  M. Passariello,et al.  Tachycardia in Septic Shock: Pathophysiological Implications and Pharmacological Treatment , 2015 .

[11]  A. Kimmoun,et al.  &bgr;1-Adrenergic Inhibition Improves Cardiac and Vascular Function in Experimental Septic Shock* , 2015, Critical care medicine.

[12]  G. Buckberg,et al.  Experimental Subendocardial Ischemia in Dogs with Normal Coronary Arteries , 1972, Circulation research.