Research Note - Perceived Firm Attributes and Intrinsic Motivation in Sponsored Open Source Software Projects

Voluntary contributions are crucial to the success of open source software OSS projects. Firms sponsoring OSS projects may face substantial challenges in soliciting such contributions, since volunteer participants are neither regulated by an employment contract nor offered financial incentives. Although prior work has shown the positive impact of motivation on the effort expended by volunteer participants, there is limited understanding of how specific firm attributes shape volunteers' intrinsic motivation. We offer a theoretical model of how the perceived community-based credibility and openness of the sponsoring firm have a positive impact on the intrinsic motivation of volunteer participants. The model is explored using survey data on volunteer participants from two sponsored OSS projects. Results show that a sponsoring firm's community-based credibility OSS developers' perception of its expertise and trustworthiness and openness its mutual knowledge exchange with the community strengthen the volunteer participants' social identification with the firm-sponsored community, which in turn reinforces their intrinsic motivation to participate. Moreover, the perceived community-based credibility of a sponsoring firm directly enhances volunteer participants' intrinsic motivation, whereas perceived openness fails to affect motivation without the mediating mechanism of social identification. Implications for firms seeking voluntary contributions for their sponsored OSS projects are discussed.

[1]  Roy T. Fielding,et al.  Economic Incentives for Participating in Open Source Software Projects , 2002, ICIS.

[2]  C. Marlene Fiol,et al.  Identification in Face-to-Face, Hybrid, and Pure Virtual Teams: Untangling the Contradictions , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[3]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[4]  Rajshekhar G. Javalgi,et al.  Awareness of Sponsorship and Corporate Image: An Empirical Investigation , 1994 .

[5]  Barbara A. Lafferty,et al.  The Impact of Corporate Credibility and Celebrity Credibility on Consumer Reaction to Advertisements and Brands , 2000 .

[6]  Marcia J. Simmering,et al.  A Tale of Three Perspectives , 2009 .

[7]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[8]  James M. Olson,et al.  The effects of priming legal concepts on perceived trust and competitiveness, self-interested attitudes, and competitive behavior , 2010 .

[9]  Yulin Fang,et al.  Understanding Sustained Participation in Open Source Software Projects , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[11]  B. Frey,et al.  Motivation crowding theory , 2001 .

[12]  P. Kollock.  The Economies of Online Cooperation: Gifts and Public Goods in Cyberspace , 1999 .

[13]  Rajiv M. Dewan,et al.  Firms as Incubators of Open Source Software , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[15]  Catherine Maguire,et al.  The Relationship between Job and Life Satisfaction: Evidence from a Remote Mining Community , 2000 .

[16]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination , 2004 .

[17]  Robert H. Moorman,et al.  Fairness and organizational citizenship behavior: What are the connections? , 1993 .

[18]  Linus Dahlander,et al.  Relationships Between Open Source Software Companies and Communities: Observations from Nordic Firms , 2005 .

[19]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Perceived Organizational Support and Employee Diligence, Commitment, and Innovation , 1990 .

[20]  M. Audrey Korsgaard,et al.  Procedural Justice in Performance Evaluation: The Role of Instrumental and Non-Instrumental Voice in Performance Appraisal Discussions , 1995 .

[21]  Timothy R. Hinkin.  A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires , 1998 .

[22]  Sebastian Spaeth,et al.  Extending Private-Collective Innovation: A Case Study , 2009 .

[23]  J. Henkel.  Selective revealing in open innovation processes: the case of embedded Linux (gekürzte Version) , 2006 .

[24]  Paul A. David,et al.  Community-Based Production of Open Source Software: What Do We Know about the Developers Who Participate? , 2008 .

[25]  D. Zeitlyn.  Gift economies in the development of open source software: anthropological reflections , 2003 .

[26]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Through a Glass Darkly: Information Technology Design, Identity Verification, and Knowledge Contribution in Online Communities , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[27]  Daniel Stewart.  Social Status in an Open-Source Community , 2005 .

[28]  N. Kerr.  Motivation losses in small groups: a social dilemma analysis , 1983 .

[29]  Oliver Christ,et al.  Identity and the Extra Mile: Relationships between Organizational Identification and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour , 2006 .

[30]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[31]  Jürgen Bitzer,et al.  Intrinsic motivation in open source software development , 2007 .

[32]  D. Harhoff,et al.  Profiting from Voluntary Information Spillovers: How Users Benefit by Freely Revealing Their Innovations , 2003 .

[33]  George Kuk,et al.  Strategic Interaction and Knowledge Sharing in the KDE Developer Mailing List , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[34]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  Identity Dynamics in Occupational Dirty Work: Integrating Social Identity and System Justification Perspectives , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[35]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: An Examination of Construct Validity , 1996, Journal of vocational behavior.

[36]  M. Dufwenberg.  Game theory. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[37]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[38]  Martin W. Wallin,et al.  A man on the inside: Unlocking communities as complementary assets , 2006 .

[39]  Sandra Slaughter,et al.  Understanding the Motivations, Participation, and Performance of Open Source Software Developers: A Longitudinal Study of the Apache Projects , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[40]  Donald P. Roy,et al.  SPONSORSHIP-LINKED MARKETING: OPENING THE BLACK BOX , 2005 .

[41]  James H. Gerlach,et al.  An empirical analysis of open source software developers' motivations and continuance intentions , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[42]  Sebastian Spaeth,et al.  Communal resources in open source software development , 2008, Inf. Res..

[43]  Rolf van Dick,et al.  Social Identities and Commitments at Work: Toward an Integrative Model. , 2006 .

[44]  John P. Meyer,et al.  The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization , 1990 .

[45]  Katherine J. Stewart,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Factors Influencing the Level of Vitality and Popularity of Open Source Projects , 2002, ICIS.

[46]  Caroline Kelly,et al.  Group Identification, Intergroup Perceptions and Collective Action , 1993 .

[47]  Ammon Salter,et al.  Cui Bono? The Selective Revealing of Knowledge and Its Implications for Innovative Activity , 2012 .

[48]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social Identity and Self-Categorization Processes in Organizational Contexts , 2000 .

[49]  Joel West,et al.  The Role of Participation Architecture in Growing Sponsored Open Source Communities , 2008 .

[50]  Katherine J. Stewart,et al.  The Impact of Ideology on Effectiveness in Open Source Software Development Teams , 2006, MIS Q..

[51]  Sonali K. Shah.  Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[52]  Utpal M. Dholakia,et al.  Open Source Software User Communities: A Study of Participation in Linux User Groups , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[53]  R. MacCallum,et al.  THE APPLICATION OF EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS IN APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY: A CRITICAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS , 1986 .

[54]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Affective commitment to the organization: the contribution of perceived organizational support. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[55]  G. Hertel,et al.  Voluntary Engagement in an Open Web-based Encyclopedia: Wikipedians, and Why They Do It , 2007 .

[56]  Eric A. von Hippel,et al.  How Open Source Software Works: 'Free' User-to-User Assistance? , 2000 .

[57]  Sebastian Spaeth,et al.  Carrots and Rainbows: Motivation and Social Practice in Open Source Software Development , 2012, MIS Q..

[58]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Assessing the unidimensionality of measurement : a paradigm and illustration within the context of information systems research , 1997 .

[59]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  Boundary Organizations: Enabling Collaboration among Unexpected Allies , 2008 .

[60]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[61]  Philippe Jacquart,et al.  On making causal claims: A review and recommendations , 2010 .

[62]  Alexander Hars,et al.  Working for Free? Motivations for Participating in Open-Source Projects , 2002, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[63]  Sandra L. Robinson,et al.  Psychological contracts and OCB: The effect of unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior , 1995 .

[64]  Brent Simpson.  Social Identity and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas , 2006 .

[65]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .

[66]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Access vs. Devolving Control , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[67]  Joachim Henkel,et al.  New ventures based on open innovation - an empirical analysis of start-up firms in embedded Linux , 2006, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[68]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[69]  Mats Magnusson,et al.  How do firms make use of open source communities , 2008 .

[70]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[71]  Julien Pénin,et al.  Open Knowledge Disclosure: An Overview of the Evidence and Economic Motivations , 2007 .

[72]  Pankaj Setia,et al.  How Peripheral Developers Contribute to Open-Source Software Development , 2012, Inf. Syst. Res..

[73]  Celia V. Harquail,et al.  Organizational images and member identification. , 1994 .

[74]  P. Muller,et al.  Why do firms disclose knowledge and how does it matter? , 2006 .

[75]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects , 2003 .

[76]  G. Spreitzer.  Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment , 1996 .

[77]  Magnus Bergquist,et al.  The power of gifts: organizing social relationships in open source communities , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[78]  Joachim Henkel,et al.  Champions of Revealing - the Role of Open Source Developers in Commercial Firms , 2008 .

[79]  J. Turner,et al.  The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism and social influence , 1986 .

[80]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Free/Libre open-source software development: What we know and what we do not know , 2012, CSUR.

[81]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[82]  Guido Hertel,et al.  Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel , 2003 .

[83]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Marginality and Problem-Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[84]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Impacts of License Choice and Organizational Sponsorship on User Interest and Development Activity in Open Source Software Projects , 2006, Inf. Syst. Res..

[85]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Research Note - The Impact of Community Commitment on Participation in Online Communities , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[86]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  A Social Influence Model of Consumer Participation in Network- and Small-Group-Based Virtual Communities , 2004 .

[87]  Catherine E. Amiot,et al.  Motivations to identify with social groups: A look at their positive and negative consequences , 2011 .

[88]  Ping Zhang,et al.  The Effects of Extrinsic Motivations and Satisfaction in Open Source Software Development , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[89]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[90]  J. Dutton,et al.  Keeping An Eye on the Mirror: Image and Identity In Organizational Adaptation , 1991 .

[91]  Nathan S. Hartman,et al.  Method Variance and Marker Variables: A Review and Comprehensive CFA Marker Technique , 2010 .

[92]  A. Bonaccorsi,et al.  Comparing Motivations of Individual Programmers and Firms to Take Part in the Open Source Movement. From Community to Business , 2006 .

[93]  Linus Dahlander,et al.  Progressing to the Center: Coordinating Project Work , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[94]  Katherine J. Stewart,et al.  The Effects of Diversity in Global, Distributed Collectives: A Study of Open Source Project Success , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[95]  Dietmar Harhoff,et al.  Strategic spillovers and incentives for research and development , 1996 .

[96]  R. Goldsmith,et al.  The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility , 2001 .

[97]  Joel West,et al.  How open is open enough?: Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies , 2003 .