Development of a Novel Prohealing Stent Designed to Deliver Sirolimus From a Biodegradable Abluminal Matrix

Background—We aimed to demonstrate that, by separating endothelial progenitor cell capture from sirolimus delivery through the application of drug to the abluminal surface of the stent, the degree of endothelialization can be enhanced. Methods and Results—Stainless steel R Stents, with biodegradable SynBiosys polymer coating with sirolimus abluminally applied and surface modified with anti-CD34 antibody were prepared at 2 dosages (low-dose sirolimus [LD-Combo, 2.5 &mgr;g sirolimus/mm] and full-dose sirolimus [Combo, 5 &mgr;g sirolimus/mm). These Combo stents and the Cypher stent (10 &mgr;g sirolimus/mm) were deployed in 98 normal porcine arteries and harvested for pharmacokinetic analysis at 0.25, 1, 3, 7, 14, 28, and 35 days. The LD-Combo stents showed faster early release (50% total dose in 72 hours) than the Combo and Cypher. At 30 days, drug release was near complete with both Combo stents, whereas 20% of drug remained on the Cypher stents. To assess efficacy, a total of 50 stents (Xience V=8, Cypher=8, Genous bioengineered R stent=6, LD-Combo=14, and Combo=14) were implanted in 18 pigs for 14 and 28 days. Optical coherence tomography was performed, and stents were harvested for histology. At 28 days, there was less neointimal thickness with Combo (0.173±0.088 mm) compared with Cypher (0.358±0.225 mm), LD-Combo (0.316±0.228 mm), and Xience V (0.305±0.252 mm; P<0.00001). Immunohistochemical analysis of endothelialization showed that Genous bioengineered R stent had the highest degree of platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule expression (87%) followed by the Combo (75%), LD-Combo (65%), and Cypher (58%). Conclusions—Both optical coherence tomography and histology demonstrate that anti-CD34 sirolimus-eluting stents promote endothelialization while reducing neointimal formation and inflammation.

[1]  Peter Barlis,et al.  Quantitative analysis of intracoronary optical coherence tomography measurements of stent strut apposition and tissue coverage. , 2010, International journal of cardiology.

[2]  Jan Baan,et al.  Genous™ endothelial progenitor cell capturing stent vs. the Taxus Liberté stent in patients with de novo coronary lesions with a high-risk of coronary restenosis: a randomized, single-centre, pilot study , 2009, European heart journal.

[3]  R. Virmani,et al.  Anti-CD34 antibodies immobilized on the surface of sirolimus-eluting stents enhance stent endothelialization. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[4]  E. Tremoli,et al.  In human endothelial cells rapamycin causes mTORC2 inhibition and impairs cell viability and function. , 2008, Cardiovascular research.

[5]  Yun-dai Chen,et al.  Are impaired endothelial progenitor cells involved in the processes of late in-stent thrombosis and re-endothelialization of drug-eluting stents? , 2008, Medical hypotheses.

[6]  Chi‐Hang Lee,et al.  Use of endothelial progenitor cell capture stent (Genous Bio-Engineered R Stent) during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: intermediate- to long-term clinical follow-up. , 2008, American heart journal.

[7]  R. Virmani,et al.  The significance of preclinical evaluation of sirolimus-, paclitaxel-, and zotarolimus-eluting stents. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[8]  K. Kent,et al.  Long-term clinical outcomes and thrombosis rates of sirolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents in an unselected population with coronary artery disease (REWARDS registry). , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  Michael Joner,et al.  Vascular Responses to Drug Eluting Stents: Importance of Delayed Healing , 2007, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[10]  R. Virmani,et al.  Vascular Pathology of Drug-Eluting Stents , 2007, Herz Kardiovaskuläre Erkrankungen.

[11]  R. Virmani,et al.  Pathological Correlates of Late Drug-Eluting Stent Thrombosis: Strut Coverage as a Marker of Endothelialization , 2007, Circulation.

[12]  John Bresnahan,et al.  Frequency, etiology, treatment, and outcomes of drug-eluting stent thrombosis during one year of follow-up. , 2007, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  S. Tsimikas,et al.  Drug-eluting stents and late adverse clinical outcomes lessons learned, lessons awaited. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  Subhash Banerjee,et al.  Endothelial progenitor cell mobilization after percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2006, Atherosclerosis.

[15]  J. Z. Chen,et al.  Effects of rapamycin on number activity and eNOS of endothelial progenitor cells from peripheral blood , 2006, Cell proliferation.

[16]  Yan Ling Zhang,et al.  Development and Validation of a High-Throughput Assay for Quantification of the Proliferation Inhibitor ABT-578 Using LC/LC-MS/MS in Blood and Tissue Samples , 2005, Therapeutic drug monitoring.

[17]  P. Serruys,et al.  One-year clinical outcome of various doses and pharmacokinetic release formulations of paclitaxel eluted from an erodable polymer - Insight in the Paclitaxel In-Stent Controlled Elution Study (PISCES). , 2005, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[18]  M. Kutryk,et al.  Genous™ Bio-engineered R stent™: development and the HEALING clinical evaluations , 2005 .

[19]  P. Serruys,et al.  Handbook of Drug-Eluting Stents , 2005 .

[20]  P. Serruys,et al.  Endothelial progenitor cell capture by stents coated with antibody against CD34: the HEALING-FIM (Healthy Endothelial Accelerated Lining Inhibits Neointimal Growth-First In Man) Registry. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  R. Nagai,et al.  Potent Inhibitory Effect of Sirolimus on Circulating Vascular Progenitor Cells , 2005, Circulation.

[22]  U. Gehling,et al.  Rapamycin inhibits proliferation and differentiation of human endothelial progenitor cells in vitro. , 2004, Experimental cell research.

[23]  David J Cohen,et al.  Stent Thrombosis After Successful Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation , 2004, Circulation.

[24]  Gregg W Stone,et al.  One-Year Clinical Results With the Slow-Release, Polymer-Based, Paclitaxel-Eluting TAXUS Stent: The TAXUS-IV Trial , 2004, Circulation.

[25]  Jeffrey W Moses,et al.  Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  T. Matsuda,et al.  Fabrication of endothelial progenitor cell (EPC)-seeded intravascular stent devices and in vitro endothelialization on hybrid vascular tissue. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[27]  Elazer R. Edelman,et al.  Drug-Eluting Stents in Preclinical Studies: Recommended Evaluation From a Consensus Group , 2002, Circulation.

[28]  A Machraoui,et al.  Acute and chronic tissue response to coronary stent implantation: pathologic findings in human specimen. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[29]  C. G. Hurst,et al.  Sensitivity of cross-reacting antihuman antibodies in formalin-fixed porcine skin: including antibodies to proliferation antigens and cytokeratins with specificity in the skin. , 1998, Journal of dermatological science.

[30]  C. Uherek,et al.  CD31/PECAM-1 is a ligand for alpha v beta 3 integrin involved in adhesion of leukocytes to endothelium , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[31]  R E Vlietstra,et al.  Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  K. Robinson,et al.  Correlated microscopic observations of arterial responses to intravascular stenting. , 1989, Scanning microscopy.

[33]  J. Palmaz,et al.  Early endothelisation of balloon-expandable stents: experimental observations , 1988 .