Coronary angiographic characteristics that influence fractional flow reserve.

BACKGROUND Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) guided with fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been shown to improve clinical outcome. Although coronary angiography is the standard method for PCI guidance, the visual severity of stenosis is not always correlated with functional severity, suggesting that there are additional angiographic factors that affect functional ischemia. METHODS AND RESULTS To evaluate angiographic predictors of positive FFR in stenotic lesions, angiographic characteristics of 260 consecutive patients (362 lesions) who underwent FFR testing from April 2009 to September 2012 were analyzed. A scoring system (STABLED score) using these predictors was developed and compared with quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). %Diameter stenosis >50% (OR, 8.43; P<0.0001), tandem lesion (OR, 4.00; P<0.0001), true bifurcation (OR, 2.42; P=0.028), lesion length >20 mm (OR, 5.40; P=0.0002), and distance from ostium <20 mm (OR, 1.94; P=0.028) were determined as independent predictors of positive FFR. Area under the ROC curve for probability of positive FFR using the STABLED score (Stenosis 2 points, TAndem lesion 1 point, Bifurcation 1 point, LEsion length 1 point, Distance from ostium 1 point) was 0.85, higher than that for QCA stenosis alone (0.76). STABLED score ≥3 had 72.3% sensitivity and 83.6% specificity for predicting positive FFR, and PPV was 76.7%. CONCLUSIONS Specific angiographic features are applicable for predicting functional ischemia. STABLED score correlates well with FFR.

[1]  P. Libby,et al.  Pathophysiology of Coronary Artery Disease , 2005, Circulation.

[2]  N. Pijls,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve , 1995 .

[3]  N. Pijls,et al.  Functional measurement of coronary stenosis. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  J. Saw,et al.  Development and validation of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) angiographic scoring tool (FAST) to improve the angiographic grading and selection of intermediate lesions that require FFR assessment , 2012, Coronary artery disease.

[5]  B. De Bruyne,et al.  Fractional flow reserve: a review , 2008, Heart.

[6]  J. Suárez de Lezo,et al.  [A new classification of coronary bifurcation lesions]. , 2006, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[7]  W. Wijns,et al.  Reperfusion treatment of ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction. , 2004, Progress in cardiovascular diseases.

[8]  T. Akasaka,et al.  Prevalence of visual–functional mismatch regarding coronary artery stenosis in the CVIT-DEFER registry , 2014, Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.

[9]  A. Dunning,et al.  Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Conservative Therapy in Nonacute Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis , 2005, Circulation.

[11]  J. Murray,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  B. De Bruyne,et al.  Functional SYNTAX score for risk assessment in multivessel coronary artery disease. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  W. Boden Which is more enduring--FAME or COURAGE? , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  William Wijns,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  Bernard J. Gersh,et al.  Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2010 .

[16]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2013, European heart journal.

[17]  N. Pijls,et al.  Fractional flow reserve to guide coronary revascularization. , 2013, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[18]  Adnan Kastrati,et al.  A meta-analysis of 17 randomized trials of a percutaneous coronary intervention-based strategy in patients with stable coronary artery disease. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  U. Siebert,et al.  Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) study. , 2007, American heart journal.

[20]  B. De Bruyne,et al.  Experimental Basis of Determining Maximum Coronary, Myocardial, and Collateral Blood Flow by Pressure Measurements for Assessing Functional Stenosis Severity Before and After Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty , 1993, Circulation.

[21]  Nikola Jagic,et al.  Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  N. Geller,et al.  Asymptomatic Cardiac Ischemia Pilot (ACIP) study two-year follow-up: outcomes of patients randomized to initial strategies of medical therapy versus revascularization. , 1997, Circulation.

[23]  L. Hillis,et al.  Primary PCI for myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  H. Fujita,et al.  Usefulness of functional assessment in the treatment of patients with moderate angiographic paclitaxel-eluting stent restenosis. , 2013, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[25]  W. Howard,et al.  Optimal Medical Therapy with or without PCI for Stable Coronary Disease , 2008 .

[26]  A. Pichard,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound lumen area parameters for assessment of physiological ischemia by fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary artery stenosis. , 2012, Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions.

[27]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  P J Scanlon,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: executive summary and recommendations. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and , 1999, Circulation.

[29]  Alfonso Medina,et al.  Una clasificación simple de las lesiones coronarias en bifurcación , 2006 .

[30]  H. Wijeysundera,et al.  Does percutaneous coronary intervention reduce mortality in patients with stable chronic angina: are we talking about apples and oranges? , 2009, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[31]  Patricia V Lawford,et al.  Virtual fractional flow reserve from coronary angiography: modeling the significance of coronary lesions: results from the VIRTU-1 (VIRTUal Fractional Flow Reserve From Coronary Angiography) study. , 2013, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.