1 Reverse Correlation and the VESPA Method

The traditional method of obtaining event-related potentials (ERPs) typically involves the repeated presentation of discrete stimulus events and extraction from the ongoing neural activity using signal averaging techniques. Assuming a sufficiently high sam pling rate, this technique allows for the determination of a response whose individual components are clearly resolved in time, allowing for a temporally detailed analysis of sensory and cognitive processes. While this method has led to tremendous advances in our understanding of the brain, both healthy and otherwise, it has a number of intrinsic limitations. These include the inability to adequately resolve responses to more than one stimulus at a time, the nonenvironmental and somewhat aversive nature of suddenly onsetting stimuli, particularly in the visual domain, and the lengthy acquisition time resulting from the incorporation of a sufficient delay between stimuli to allow the neural activity to return to baseline. In this chapter we describe a method for obtaining a novel visual ERP known as the VESPA (for visual evoked spread spectrum analysis) that seeks to address the limitations of the standard visual evoked potential (VEP). This method involves the recording of neural activity during the presentation of continuous, stochastically modulated stimuli and the use of reverse correlation to determine the transfer function of the human visual system, that is, the function that converts the presented stimulus into the recorded neural activity. First, we introduce the broader reverse correlation technique that has seen widespread use in the analysis of many physiological systems. We follow this introduction with a description of the VESPA method itself, including a discussion of the differences between the standard VEP and the VESPA, and some proposed applications and extensions.

[1]  Alison R. Davis,et al.  Differential changes of magnocellular and parvocellular visual function in early- and late-onset strabismic amblyopia. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  G. V. Simpson,et al.  Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Setting Boundaries: Brain Dynamics of Modal and Amodal Illusory Shape Completion in Humans , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  John J. Foxe,et al.  The case for feedforward multisensory convergence during early cortical processing , 2005, Neuroreport.

[5]  E. Kaplan,et al.  The dynamics of primate M retinal ganglion cells , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.

[6]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Subcortical visual dysfunction in schizophrenia drives secondary cortical impairments. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  H M Sakai,et al.  Signal transmission in the catfish retina. V. Sensitivity and circuit. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Visual Perceptual Learning in Human Object Recognition Areas: A Repetition Priming Study Using High-Density Electrical Mapping , 2001, NeuroImage.

[9]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Filling-in in schizophrenia: a high-density electrical mapping and source-analysis investigation of illusory contour processing. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  Vasilis Z. Marmarelis,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamic Modeling of Physiological Systems , 2004 .

[11]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Visual evoked spread spectrum analysis (VESPA) responses to stimuli biased towards magnocellular and parvocellular pathways , 2009, Vision Research.

[12]  L. Stark,et al.  The kernel identification method (1910–1977)— review of theory, calculation, application, and interpretation , 1977 .

[13]  S. Luck,et al.  Sources of attention-sensitive visual event-related potentials , 2005, Brain Topography.

[14]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Early visual processing deficits in schizophrenia: impaired P1 generation revealed by high-density electrical mapping , 2001, Neuroreport.

[15]  P. Z. Marmarelis,et al.  Analysis of Physiological Systems: The White-Noise Approach , 2011 .

[16]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. II. Linearity of temporal and spatial summation. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  M. Schetzen,et al.  Nonlinear system modeling based on the Wiener theory , 1981, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[18]  R. McCarley,et al.  Abnormal Neural Synchrony in Schizophrenia , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Barak A. Pearlmutter,et al.  Dissecting the cellular contributions to early visual sensory processing deficits in schizophrenia using the VESPA evoked response , 2008, Schizophrenia Research.

[20]  D. Javitt,et al.  Early-stage visual processing and cortical amplification deficits in schizophrenia. , 2005, Archives of general psychiatry.

[21]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Impaired visual object recognition and dorsal/ventral stream interaction in schizophrenia. , 2002, Archives of general psychiatry.

[22]  Kenneth R Alexander,et al.  Contrast response properties of magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in retinitis pigmentosa assessed by the visual evoked potential. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  Daniel C. Javitt,et al.  Impairments in generation of early-stage transient visual evoked potentials to magno- and parvocellular-selective stimuli in schizophrenia , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  K. Naka,et al.  White-Noise Analysis of a Neuron Chain: An Application of the Wiener Theory , 1972, Science.

[25]  J. P. Jones,et al.  The two-dimensional spectral structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  Barak A. Pearlmutter,et al.  Isolating endogenous visuo-spatial attentional effects using the novel visual-evoked spread spectrum analysis (VESPA) technique , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[27]  G. D. Mccann,et al.  A family of quasi-white random signals and its optimal use in biological system identification , 1977, Biological Cybernetics.

[28]  Y. W. Lee,et al.  Measurement of the Wiener Kernels of a Non-linear System by Cross-correlation† , 1965 .

[29]  Richard Coppola,et al.  A SYSTEM TRANSFER FUNCTION FOR VISUAL EVOKED POTENTIALS , 1979 .

[30]  D. Badcock,et al.  Contrast sensitivity changes due to glaucoma and normal aging: low-spatial-frequency losses in both magnocellular and parvocellular pathways. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[31]  Barry B. Lee,et al.  Chapter 7 New views of primate retinal function , 1990 .

[32]  J. Stein,et al.  Visual magnocellular deficits in dyslexia. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  Markus Meister,et al.  Multi-neuronal signals from the retina: acquisition and analysis , 1994, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[34]  E. Sutter,et al.  M and P Components of the VEP and their Visual Field Distribution , 1997, Vision Research.

[35]  Joel Pokorny,et al.  Contrast sensitivity deficits in inferred magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in retinitis pigmentosa. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[36]  D. Javitt,et al.  Dysfunction of early-stage visual processing in schizophrenia: harmonic analysis , 2005, Schizophrenia Research.

[37]  N. Wiener,et al.  Nonlinear Problems in Random Theory , 1964 .

[38]  J. Pokorny,et al.  Luminance and chromatic modulation sensitivity of macaque ganglion cells and human observers. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[39]  Barak A. Pearlmutter,et al.  The VESPA: A method for the rapid estimation of a visual evoked potential , 2006, NeuroImage.

[40]  P Kuyper,et al.  Triggered correlation. , 1968, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[41]  C. Schroeder,et al.  Dysfunction of early-stage visual processing in schizophrenia. , 2001, The American journal of psychiatry.