Comparison of two heights for forward-placed trunk support with standing work.

Two forward-placed supports with different heights are investigated using human motion capture and EMG. Ten male participants stood in 10 degrees increments of trunk flexion between 0 and 40 degrees for three conditions; leaning on a desk adjusted to the height of the pelvis, leaning on a prototype support at the height of the sternum and with no external support. Low back and hip extensor muscle activity was reduced by an average 60% with leaning against the prototype compared to the no-support condition whereas leaning on a desk produced no significant change in muscle activity. Supported conditions resulted in greater forward displacement of the trunk by at least two-fold compared to no-support representing a longer reach distance. No adverse changes in kinematics indicate that either support blocked segmental flexion of the pelvis, lumbar spine or thoracic spine. These findings suggest that leaning against a higher-placed trunk support could be beneficial for tasks requiring forward flexion.

[1]  Krishna Gopal Rampal,et al.  Ergonomic risk factors of work processes in the semiconductor industry in Peninsular Malaysia. , 2004, Industrial health.

[2]  市瀬 護国,et al.  Fitting the Task to the Man An Ergonomic Approach by E.Grandjean, 161頁, 1969年, Taylor & Francis Ltd, London , 1970 .

[3]  E. Grandjean,et al.  Fitting the task to the man: An ergonomic approach , 1980 .

[4]  Tokeer Hussain,et al.  Musculoskeletal symptoms among truck assembly workers. , 2004, Occupational medicine.

[5]  S. McGill A myoelectrically based dynamic three-dimensional model to predict loads on lumbar spine tissues during lateral bending. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  S. Kikuchi,et al.  Mechanical Load of the Lumbar Spine During Forward Bending Motion of the Trunk–A Biomechanical Study , 2006, Spine.

[7]  R. Norman,et al.  Mechanically corrected EMG for the continuous estimation of erector spinae muscle loading during repetitive lifting , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[8]  S M McGill,et al.  Lumbar erector spinae oxygenation during prolonged contractions: implications for prolonged work , 2000, Ergonomics.

[9]  J. V. van Dieën,et al.  Thoracic Kyphosis Affects Spinal Loads and Trunk Muscle Force , 2007, Physical Therapy.

[10]  Stefania Fatone,et al.  The Effect of Trunk-Flexed Postures on Balance and Metabolic Energy Expenditure During Standing , 2007, Spine.

[11]  R. Norman,et al.  A comparison of peak vs cumulative physical work exposure risk factors for the reporting of low back pain in the automotive industry. , 1998, Clinical biomechanics.

[12]  S Kumar,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Oxerexertion, Safety, and Risk of Injury in Occupational Settings , 1994, Human factors.

[13]  K Messing,et al.  Standing, sitting and associated working conditions in the Quebec population in 1998 , 2005, Ergonomics.