Soil temperature at ECMWF: An assessment using ground‐based observations

Soil temperature is an important variable for the representation of many physical processes in numerical weather prediction (NWP). It is the key driver for all surface emissions of energy, carbon dioxide, and water and forward operator for all satellite sensors sensitive to land. Yet the forecast quality of this variable in NWP is largely unknown. In this study, in situ soil temperature measurements from nearly 700 stations belonging to four networks across the United States and Europe are used to assess the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) forecasts of soil temperature during 2012. Evaluation of the time series shows a good performance of the short-range forecasts (day one) in capturing both soil temperature annual and diurnal cycles with very high level of correlation (0.92 and over), averaged root-mean-square differences ranging from 2.54°C to 3.89°C and averaged biases ranging from −0.52°C to 0.94°C. The orography data set used in the forecast system was found to have a strong impact on the outcomes of the evaluation. The difference between elevation of a station and that of the corresponding grid cell in the ECMWF model may lead to large temperature differences linked to linear processes resulting in a constant bias, as well as nonlinear processes (e.g., to snow melt in spring). This verification study aims to contribute to a better understanding of the near-surface forecasts performance highlighting land-atmosphere processes that need to be better represented in future model development such as snow pack melting and heat diffusion in the soil.

[1]  Jean-Pierre Wigneron,et al.  A Global Simulation of Microwave Emission: Error Structures Based on Output From ECMWF's Operational Integrated Forecast System , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[2]  Isabel F. Trigo,et al.  Clear-Sky Window Channel Radiances: A Comparison between Observations and the ECMWF Model , 2003 .

[3]  L. Isaksen,et al.  A simplified Extended Kalman Filter for the global operational soil moisture analysis at ECMWF , 2013 .

[4]  W. J. Shuttleworth,et al.  An Agenda for Land-Surface Hydrology Research and a Call for the Second International Hydrological Decade , 2013 .

[5]  Kelly Elder,et al.  An Improved Snow Scheme for the ECMWF Land Surface Model: Description and Offline Validation , 2010 .

[6]  Lars Isaksen,et al.  Soil Moisture Analyses at ECMWF: Evaluation Using Global Ground-Based In Situ Observations , 2012 .

[7]  Jiancheng Shi,et al.  The Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Mission , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[8]  B. Hurk,et al.  A Revised Hydrology for the ECMWF Model: Verification from Field Site to Terrestrial Water Storage and Impact in the Integrated Forecast System , 2009 .

[9]  Klaus Scipal,et al.  Towards a Kalman Filter based soil moisture analysis system for the operational ECMWF Integrated Forecast System , 2009 .

[10]  Y. Kerr,et al.  The SMOS Mission: New Tool for Monitoring Key Elements of the Global Water Cycle This satellite mission will use new algorithms to try to forecast weather and estimate climate change from satellite measurements of the Earth's surface. , 2010 .

[11]  M. Drusch,et al.  Comparing ERA-40-based L-band brightness temperatures with skylab observations: a calibration/validation study using the community microwave emission model. , 2009 .

[12]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Hot days induced by precipitation deficits at the global scale , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Jean-François Mahfouf,et al.  Evaluation of the Optimum Interpolation and Nudging Techniques for Soil Moisture Analysis Using FIFE Data , 2000 .

[14]  Jean-François Mahfouf,et al.  The representation of soil moisture freezing and its impact on the stable boundary layer , 1999 .

[15]  Thomas J. Jackson,et al.  An assessment of surface soil temperature products from numerical weather prediction models using ground‐based measurements , 2012 .

[16]  John Kochendorfer,et al.  U.S. Climate Reference Network Soil Moisture and Temperature Observations , 2013 .

[17]  Yann Kerr,et al.  AMMA Land Surface Model Intercomparison experiment coupled to the Community Microwave Emission Model: ALMIP-MEM , 2009 .

[18]  Patricia de Rosnay,et al.  Technical Implementation of SMOS Data in the ECMWF Integrated Forecasting System , 2012, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[19]  Gérard Dedieu,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability of land CO2 fluxes estimated with remote sensing and analysis data over western Eurasia , 2002 .

[20]  M. Schervish P Values: What They are and What They are Not , 1996 .

[21]  R. Koster,et al.  Modeling the land surface boundary in climate models as a composite of independent vegetation stands , 1992 .

[22]  Lars Isaksen,et al.  Initialisation of Land Surface Variables for Numerical Weather Prediction , 2014, Surveys in Geophysics.

[23]  W. Wagner,et al.  Skill and Global Trend Analysis of Soil Moisture from Reanalyses and Microwave Remote Sensing , 2013 .

[24]  Jean-François Mahfouf,et al.  Analysis of Soil Moisture from Near-Surface Parameters: A Feasibility Study , 1991 .

[25]  A. Simmons,et al.  The ECMWF operational implementation of four‐dimensional variational assimilation. I: Experimental results with simplified physics , 2007 .