A Closer Look at Cross‐Functional Collaboration and Product Innovativeness: Contingency Effects of Structural and Relational Context

This study applies a contingency perspective to examine how the intra-organizational context influences the relationship between cross-functional collaboration and product innovativeness. It focuses on the role of (1) formal, structural factors directly controllable by top management decisions and (2) more intangible, relational factors as potential enhancements of the firm's ability to convert cross-functional collaboration into product innovativeness. A study of 232 firms confirms the hypotheses, finding that the relationship between cross-functional collaboration and product innovativeness is stronger for higher levels of decision autonomy and shared responsibility (structural context) and social interaction, trust, and goal congruence (relational context). In addition, a post-hoc analysis using a configurational approach to organizational contingencies reveals that organizations' relational context is more potent than their structural context for converting cross-functional collaboration into product innovativeness. The study's implications and future research directions are discussed.

[1]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Strategizing Throughout the Organization: Managing Role Conflict in Strategic Renewal , 2000 .

[2]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[3]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams , 2005 .

[4]  Jinhong Xie,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Marketing Managers’ Conflict-Handling Behaviors , 2000 .

[5]  D. Gerwin,et al.  Withdrawal of team autonomy during concurrent engineering , 1997 .

[6]  Ludwig Bstieler,et al.  Trust Formation in Collaborative New Product Development , 2006 .

[7]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[8]  D. Clercq,et al.  Effects of relational capital and commitment on venture capitalists' perception of portfolio company performance , 2006 .

[9]  Anthony Di Benedetto,et al.  Managerial Trust in New Product Development Projects: Its Antecedents and Consequences , 2009 .

[10]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Peformance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[11]  UzziBrian,et al.  Relational Embeddedness and Learning , 2003 .

[12]  E. Schein.  Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .

[13]  Amy L. Pablo,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Determinants of Risk Behavior , 1992 .

[14]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[15]  Jan Kratzer,et al.  Systematic Design Methods and the Creative Performance of New Product Teams: Do They Contradict or Complement Each Other? , 2007 .

[16]  Kenneth B. Kahn.  Interdepartmental Integration: A Definition with Implications for Product Development Performance , 1996 .

[17]  J. Farley,et al.  Determinants of Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 1990 .

[18]  Lisa C . Troy,et al.  Innovativeness and new product success: insights from the cumulative evidence , 2007 .

[19]  L. Bengtsson,et al.  The Interorganizational Learning Dilemma: Collective Knowledge Development in Strategic Alliances , 1998 .

[20]  Tasadduq A. Shervani,et al.  Market-Based Assets and Shareholder Value: A Framework for Analysis , 1998 .

[21]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Market Knowledge Dimensions and Cross-Functional Collaboration: Examining the Different Routes to Product Innovation Performance , 2007 .

[22]  M. Kafouros.  R&D and productivity growth: Evidence from the UK , 2005 .

[23]  Marjorie E. Adams,et al.  Enhancing New Product Development Performance: An Organizational Learning Perspective , 1998 .

[24]  J. Hauser,et al.  Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature , 1996 .

[25]  A. Denisi,et al.  The impact of ratee's disability on performance judgments and choice as partner: The role of disability–job fit stereotypes and interdependence of rewards. , 1998 .

[26]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[27]  David J. Miller,et al.  Configurations of strategy and structure: Towards a synthesis , 1986 .

[28]  C. Collins,et al.  STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICES, TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM SOCIAL NETWORKS, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: THE ROLE OF HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICES IN CREATING ORGANIZATIONAL COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE , 2003 .

[29]  Haiyang Li,et al.  Product Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Technology Ventures in China , 2001 .

[30]  G. Hult,et al.  Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance , 2004 .

[31]  K SmithWendy,et al.  Managing Strategic Contradictions , 2005 .

[32]  Thomas E. Becker,et al.  Employee commitment and motivation: a conceptual analysis and integrative model. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[33]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI): Development and validation. , 1996 .

[34]  Robert W. Ruekert,et al.  Marketing's Interaction with Other Functional Units: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence: , 1987 .

[35]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[36]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Strategy and Structure in the Multiproduct Firm , 1987 .

[37]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Trust in close relationships. , 1985 .

[38]  Mushin Lee,et al.  Determinants of technical success in product development when innovative radicalness is considered , 1994 .

[39]  Michael Song,et al.  Conflict management and innovation performance: An integrated contingency perspective , 2006 .

[40]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[41]  Wenpin Tsai.  Social Structure of Coopetition Within a Multiunit Organization: Coordination, Competition, and Intraorganizational Knowledge Sharing , 2002 .

[42]  William H. Glick,et al.  Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories , 1993 .

[43]  Robert S. Dooley,et al.  Attaining Decision Quality and Commitment From Dissent: The Moderating Effects of Loyalty and Competence in Strategic Decision-Making Teams , 1999 .

[44]  Deborah G. . Ancona,et al.  Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Performance , 1992 .

[45]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Knowledge Exchange and Combination: The Role of Human Resource Practices in the Performance of High-Technology Firms , 2006 .

[46]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  A mid-range theory of interfunctional integration, its antecedents and outcomes , 1993 .

[47]  Andrea L. Larson.  Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships , 1992 .

[48]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[49]  Brian Uzzi,et al.  Relational Embeddedness and Learning: The Case of Bank Loan Managers and Their Clients , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[50]  Carrie R. Leana,et al.  Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices , 1999 .

[51]  Neil A. Morgan,et al.  A Configuration Theory Assessment of Marketing Organization Fit with Business Strategy and Its Relationship with Marketing Performance , 2003 .

[52]  D. Shepherd,et al.  Entrepreneurial Orientation and Small Business Performance: A Configurational Approach , 2005 .

[53]  Jinhong Xie,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Goal Incongruity on New Product Development in Five Countries: A Marketing View , 2003 .

[54]  B. Skyrms.  Rational Commitment and Social Justice: The Shadow of the Future , 1998 .

[55]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[56]  J. Sharp,et al.  The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance , 2008 .

[57]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[58]  William E. Souder,et al.  New Product Development Performance and the Interaction of Cross‐Functional Integration and Knowledge Management , 2005 .

[59]  K. Klein,et al.  The Challenge of Innovation Implementation , 1996 .

[60]  Rebecca J. Slotegraaf,et al.  Cross-Functional 'Coopetition': The Simultaneous Role of Cooperation and Competition within Firms , 2006 .

[61]  Riki Takeuchi,et al.  When Does Decision Autonomy Increase Expatriate Managers' Adjustment? An Empirical Test , 2008 .

[62]  H. Klein.  Further evidence on the relationship between goal setting and expectancy theories. , 1991 .

[63]  Robert Arnold.  R&D and Productivity Growth , 2005 .

[64]  E. Autio,et al.  SOCIAL CAPITAL, KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION, AND KNOWLEDGE EXPLOITATION IN YOUNG TECHNOLOGY-BASED FIRMS , 2001 .

[65]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. , 2001 .

[66]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[67]  Steven W. Floyd,et al.  Middle Management’s Strategic Influence and Organizational Performance , 1997 .

[68]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Exploratory and Exploitative Learning in New Product Development: A Social Capital Perspective on New Technology Ventures in China , 2007 .

[69]  Carol T. Kulik,et al.  Old Friends, New Faces: Motivation Research in the 1990s , 1999 .

[70]  David W. Gerbing,et al.  An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment , 1988 .

[71]  Ricky W. Griffin,et al.  Toward a Theory of Organizational Creativity , 1993 .

[72]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Markets, Firms, and the Process of Economic Development , 1999 .

[73]  M. Brewer,et al.  Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations. , 1996 .

[74]  J. Workman.  Marketing's Limited Role in New Product Development in One Computer Systems Firm , 1993 .

[75]  Annalisa M. VanHook,et al.  Not So Different After All , 2011, Science Signaling.

[76]  TsaiWenpin.  Social Structure of "Coopetition" Within a Multiunit Organization , 2002 .

[77]  Jeffrey B. Schmidt,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of cross-functional cooperation: A comparison of R&D, manufacturing, and marketing perspectives , 1997 .

[78]  B. Menguc,et al.  Top management team diversity and innovativeness: The moderating role of interfunctional coordination , 2005 .

[79]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Resolving the Capability–Rigidity Paradox in New Product Innovation , 2005 .

[80]  A. Payne,et al.  A Strategic Framework for Customer Relationship Management , 2005 .

[81]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effectsof Interorganizational and Interpersonaltrust on Performance , 1998 .

[82]  D. Wilemon,et al.  A Model for Studying R&D–Marketing Interface in the Product Innovation Process , 1986 .

[83]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[84]  Jinhong Xie,et al.  The Impact of Cross‐Functional Joint Involvement Across Product Development Stages: An Exploratory Study , 1998 .

[85]  Andrew Hargadon,et al.  Special Issue: Knowledge, Knowing, and Organizations: Action and Possibility: Reconciling Dual Perspectives of Knowledge in Organizations , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[86]  Daniel C. Smith,et al.  Cross-Functional Product Development Teams, Creativity, and the Innovativeness of New Consumer Products , 2001 .

[87]  Howard E. McCurdy.  Faster, Better, Cheaper , 2001 .

[88]  Ruby P. Lee,et al.  Information Use and New Product Outcomes: The Contingent Role of Strategy Type , 2007 .

[89]  G GilbertClark.  Change in the Presence of Residual Fit , 2006 .

[90]  Berend Wierenga,et al.  Erim Report Series Research in Management the Effectiveness of Different Mechanisms for Integrating Marketing and R & D Bibliographic Data and Classifications , 2022 .

[91]  Gabriel Szulanski.  Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 1996 .

[92]  Knowlton W. Johnson.  Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: Testing a Theory for Research Use , 1998 .

[93]  Rajesh Sethi,et al.  Can Quality‐Oriented Firms Develop Innovative New Products? , 2009 .

[94]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[95]  Srinivas Talluri,et al.  Faster, better, cheaper: A study of NPD project efficiency and performance tradeoffs , 2006 .

[96]  J. Rossiter,et al.  The Predictive Validity of Multiple-Item versus Single-Item Measures of the Same Constructs , 2007 .

[97]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[98]  L. Feldman,et al.  The Role of Salary and Incentives in the New Product Function , 1996 .

[99]  Rajesh Sethi,et al.  Structural and contextual correlates of charged behavior in product development teams , 2001 .

[100]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Can You Hear Me Now? Communication in Virtual Product Development Teams* , 2009 .

[101]  LarssonRikard,et al.  The Interorganizational Learning Dilemma , 1998 .

[102]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: a meta-analytic review and test of two theories. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[103]  A BurgelmanRobert.  Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation , 1991 .

[104]  Toyohiro Kono,et al.  Organizing for Effective New Product Development , 2007 .

[105]  B. Dyer,et al.  Innovation strategy and the R&D-marketing interface in Japanese firms: a contingency perspective , 1995 .

[106]  J. Pinto,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation , 1993 .

[107]  Jan B. Heide,et al.  The Shadow Of The Future: Effects Of Anticipated Interaction And Frequency Of Contact On Buyer-Seller Cooperation , 1992 .

[108]  A. Winder,et al.  An Evolving Definition of Collaboration and Some Implications for the World of Work , 1977 .

[109]  Avan R. Jassawalla,et al.  An Examination of Collaboration in High‐Technology New Product Development Processes , 1998 .

[110]  Wenpin Tsai.  Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages , 2000 .

[111]  Petra M. Bosch-Sijtsema,et al.  Cooperative Innovation Projects: Capabilities and Governance Mechanisms* , 2009 .

[112]  X. Song,et al.  Innovation Strategy and Sanctioned Conflict: A New Edge in Innovation? , 1998 .

[113]  E. McDonough.  Investigation of Factors Contributing to the Success of Cross-Functional Teams , 2000 .

[114]  R. Mauborgne,et al.  Procedural justice, strategic decision making, and the knowledge economy , 1998 .

[115]  M. Hitt,et al.  International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. , 2000 .

[116]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  Creating market anticipation: An exploratory examination of the effect of preannouncement behavior on a new product’s launch , 2006 .

[117]  Significant Issues for the Future of Product Innovation , 1995 .

[118]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Cooperative Versus Competitive Structures in Related and Unrelated Diversified Firms , 1992 .

[119]  Yi Li,et al.  Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Influence of business strategies and environment , 2010 .

[120]  G. Yukl,et al.  Determinants of delegation and consultation by managers , 1999 .

[121]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  Flexibility and standardization: test of a contingency model of product design–manufacturing integration , 1999 .

[122]  R. Handfield,et al.  Knowledge Sharing in Interorganizational Product Development Teams: The Effect of Formal and Informal Socialization Mechanisms* , 2009 .

[123]  R. Peterson,et al.  Task Conflict snd Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams:The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust. , 1998 .

[124]  James D. Adams,et al.  Bounding the Effects of R&D an Investigation Using Matched Establishment-Firm Data , 1996 .

[125]  J. Brockner,et al.  When Trust Matters: The Moderating Effect of Outcome Favorability , 1997 .

[126]  Jae-Hyeon Ahn,et al.  Reward systems for intra-organizational knowledge sharing , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[127]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness. , 1995 .

[128]  David B. Balkin,et al.  Effectiveness of Individual and Aggregate Compensation Strategies , 1989 .

[129]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review , 2002 .

[130]  CaponNoel,et al.  Determinants of Financial Performance , 1990 .

[131]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[132]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[133]  M. Bloom,et al.  The Performance Effects of Pay Dispersion on Individuals and Organizations , 1999 .

[134]  Clark G. Gilbert,et al.  Change in the Presence of Residual Fit: Can Competing Frames Coexist? , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[135]  Robert A. Burgelman.  Intraorganizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation: Theory and Field Research , 1991 .