Long-Term Patterns of Online Evidence Retrieval Use in General Practice: A 12-Month Study

Background Provision of online evidence at the point of care is one strategy that could provide clinicians with easy access to up-to-date evidence in clinical settings in order to support evidence-based decision making. Objective The aim was to determine long-term use of an online evidence system in routine clinical practice. Methods This was a prospective cohort study. 59 clinicians who had a computer with Internet access in their consulting room participated in a 12-month trial of Quick Clinical, an online evidence system specifically designed around the needs of general practitioners (GPs). Patterns of use were determined by examination of computer logs and survey analysis. Results On average, 9.9 searches were conducted by each GP in the first 2 months of the study. After this, usage dropped to 4.4 searches per GP in the third month and then levelled off to between 0.4 and 2.6 searches per GP per month. The majority of searches (79.2%, 2013/2543) were conducted during practice hours (between 9 am and 5 pm) and on weekdays (90.7%, 2315/2543). The most frequent searches related to diagnosis (33.6%, 821/2291) and treatment (34.5%, 844/2291). Conclusion GPs will use an online evidence retrieval system in routine practice; however, usage rates drop significantly after initial introduction of the system. Long-term studies are required to determine the extent to which GPs will integrate the use of such technologies into their everyday clinical practice and how this will affect the satisfaction and health outcomes of their patients.

[1]  Jerome A Osheroff,et al.  Research Paper: Answering Physicians' Clinical Questions: Obstacles and Potential Solutions , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[2]  Robert Kristofco,et al.  Information‐seeking behaviors and reflective practice , 2006, The Journal of continuing education in the health professions.

[3]  D. McInnes,et al.  General practitioners’ use of computers for prescribing and electronic health records: results from a national survey , 2006, The Medical journal of Australia.

[4]  Douglas B. Fridsma,et al.  Research Paper: Effectiveness of Clinician-selected Electronic Information Resources for Answering Primary Care Physicians' Information Needs , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[5]  M. Collen,et al.  Full-text medical literature retrieval by computer. A pilot test. , 1985, JAMA.

[6]  R A Bankowitz,et al.  Physicians' use of computer software in answering clinical questions. , 1993, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[7]  Johanna I. Westbrook,et al.  Do online information retrieval systems help experienced clinicians answer clinical questions? , 2005, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[8]  Enrico Coiera,et al.  Architecture for Knowledge-Based and Federated Search of Online Clinical Evidence , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[9]  Farah Magrabi,et al.  What factors are associated with the integration of evidence retrieval technology into routine general practice settings? , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[10]  Farah Magrabi,et al.  General practitioners' use of online evidence during consultations , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[11]  Roland M. Grad,et al.  Impact of clinical information-retrieval technology on physicians: A literature review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[12]  H. C. Coumou,et al.  How do primary care physicians seek answers to clinical questions? A literature review. , 2006, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.