Bayesian Analysis of Dynamic Bivariate Mixture Models: Can They Explain the Behavior of Returns and Trading Volume?

Bivariate mixture models attribute the well-known positive correlation between return volatility and trading volume in financial markets to stochastic changes in a single latent variable representing the number of information arrivals. In this article, dynamic bivariate mixture models that allow for autocorrelation in the latent variable are analyzed by a Bayesian method via Markov-chain Monte Carlo techniques. The results, based on daily data from the Nikkei 225 stock-index futures, reveal that the Tauchen and Pitts model, in which returns and volume follow a bivariate normal distribution conditional on the latent variable, cannot account for the persistence in squared returns, whereas the Andersen model, in which the conditional distribution of volume is Poisson, cannot account for the persistence in volume. It is also found that the Tauchen and Pitts model yields too narrow Bayesian confidence intervals of the out-of-sample squared returns.

[1]  P. Clark A Subordinated Stochastic Process Model with Finite Variance for Speculative Prices , 1973 .

[2]  George Tauchen,et al.  THE PRICE VARIABILITY-VOLUME RELATIONSHIP ON SPECULATIVE MARKETS , 1983 .

[3]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders , 1985 .

[4]  A. Kyle Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading , 1985 .

[5]  T. Bollerslev,et al.  Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity , 1986 .

[6]  L. Harris Cross-Security Tests of the Mixture of Distributions Hypothesis , 1986, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[7]  Lawrence Harris,et al.  Transaction Data Tests of the Mixture of Distributions Hypothesis , 1987, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[8]  Jonathan M. Karpoff The Relation between Price Changes and Trading Volume: A Survey , 1987, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[9]  F. Diebold Empirical modeling of exchange rate dynamics , 1988 .

[10]  Christopher G. Lamoureux,et al.  Heteroskedasticity in Stock Return Data: Volume versus GARCH Effects , 1990 .

[11]  John Geweke,et al.  Evaluating the accuracy of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of posterior moments , 1991 .

[12]  H. Bessembinder,et al.  Price Volatility, Trading Volume, and Market Depth: Evidence from Futures Markets , 1993, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[13]  J. Richard,et al.  Accelerated gaussian importance sampler with application to dynamic latent variable models , 1993 .

[14]  Jun S. Liu,et al.  Covariance structure of the Gibbs sampler with applications to the comparisons of estimators and augmentation schemes , 1994 .

[15]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Bayesian Analysis of Stochastic Volatility Models , 1994 .

[16]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Bayesian Analysis of Stochastic Volatility Models: Comments: Reply , 1994 .

[17]  Christopher G. Lamoureux,et al.  Endogenous Trading Volume and Momentum in Stock-Return Volatility , 1994 .

[18]  Jón Dańıelsson Stochastic volatility in asset prices estimation with simulated maximum likelihood , 1994 .

[19]  M. Richardson,et al.  A Direct Test of the Mixture of Distributions Hypothesis: Measuring the Daily Flow of Information , 1994, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[20]  L. Tierney Markov Chains for Exploring Posterior Distributions , 1994 .

[21]  Joel Hasbrouck,et al.  Securities Trading in the Absence of Dealers: Trades and Quotes on the Tokyo Stock Exchange , 1995 .

[22]  N. Shephard,et al.  The simulation smoother for time series models , 1995 .

[23]  S. Chib,et al.  Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings Algorithm , 1995 .

[24]  T. Andersen Return Volatility and Trading Volume: An Information Flow Interpretation of Stochastic Volatility , 1996 .

[25]  N. Shephard Statistical aspects of ARCH and stochastic volatility , 1996 .

[26]  A. Harvey,et al.  5 Stochastic volatility , 1996 .

[27]  D. Cox,et al.  Time series models : in econometrics, finance and other fields , 1997 .

[28]  M. Pitt,et al.  Likelihood analysis of non-Gaussian measurement time series , 1997 .

[29]  T. Bollerslev,et al.  ANSWERING THE SKEPTICS: YES, STANDARD VOLATILITY MODELS DO PROVIDE ACCURATE FORECASTS* , 1998 .