Clinical evaluation of a transmission detector system and comparison with a homogeneous 3D phantom dosimeter.

PURPOSE To evaluate the performances of the Dolphin system for pre-treatment verification (IBA Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany) based on transmission measurements, employing a clinical perspective. METHODS AND MATERIALS Fifty treatment plans were verified by Dolphin and Delta4 detectors (Scandidos, Uppsala, Sweden) during the same session and subsequently by the Delta4 itself. The attenuation factor of the transmission detector (required for on-line dosimetry) was evaluated by comparing Delta4 measurements with and without Dolphin. Gamma evaluation was performed to compare the plan dose with the one delivered in case of Delta4 and Dolphin (gamma analysis within the structures). Dose-volume based parameters for PTV and OARs doses were considered for Compass calculation and Dolphin reconstruction and clinical decisions were made by two expert physicians in order to assess the "pass", "fail" or "evaluate" grade of the treatment plans. A statistical analysis was performed to investigate the eventual correlation between Delta4 gamma analysis and Dolphin clinical evaluation. RESULTS A value of 10.7% ± 0.7% was found for detector attenuation. No patients were classified as "fail" by the two instruments as well as by physicians. No correlation was found between the Delta4gamma metric and physician classification; conversely, a significant correlation was observed for Dolphin between the numbers of points with gamma ≥1 (gamma failure rate, as evaluated by the Dolphin) in the PTV area and clinical decision. CONCLUSION The Dolphin system demonstrated to be an accurate detector for pre-treatment purposes and could be used as a clinical decision making tool for plan acceptance.

[1]  E. Williams,et al.  Dose modification factor analysis of multilumen balloon brachytherapy applicator with Monte Carlo simulation , 2013, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[2]  Frederik Wenz,et al.  Patient-specific online dose verification based on transmission detector measurements. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  L. Holloway,et al.  Comparison of three commercial dosimetric systems in detecting clinically significant VMAT delivery errors. , 2016, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[4]  Frederik Wenz,et al.  Characterization of a new transmission detector for patient individualized online plan verification and its influence on 6MV X-ray beam characteristics. , 2016, Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik.

[5]  Ping Xia,et al.  Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement‐based verification QA , 2018, Medical physics.

[6]  James L Bedford,et al.  Evaluation of the Delta4 phantom for IMRT and VMAT verification , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Laure Vieillevigne,et al.  Gamma index comparison of three VMAT QA systems and evaluation of their sensitivity to delivery errors. , 2015, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[8]  Benedick A Fraass,et al.  Safety considerations for IMRT: executive summary. , 2011, Medical physics.

[9]  D. G. Lewis,et al.  A comparison of electronic portal dosimetry verification methods for use in stereotactic radiotherapy. , 2016, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[10]  M Hussein,et al.  Challenges in calculation of the gamma index in radiotherapy - Towards good practice. , 2017, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[11]  Rajat J Kudchadker,et al.  Quantification of beam complexity in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment plans. , 2014, Medical physics.

[12]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  3D in vivo dose verification of entire hypo-fractionated IMRT treatments using an EPID and cone-beam CT. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  Katja M Langen,et al.  Analyzing the impact of intrafraction motion: Correlation of different dose metrics with changes in target D95. , 2011, Medical physics.

[14]  T. Frenzel,et al.  The use of IMRT in Germany , 2015, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[15]  D. Low,et al.  A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. , 1998, Medical physics.

[16]  Sara Bresciani,et al.  Pretreatment patient-specific IMRT quality assurance: a correlation study between gamma index and patient clinical dose volume histogram. , 2012, Medical physics.

[17]  Takeshi Ono,et al.  Validation of a method for in vivo 3D dose reconstruction in SBRT using a new transmission detector , 2017, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[18]  Kai Yang,et al.  Comparing measurement‐derived (3DVH) and machine log file‐derived dose reconstruction methods for VMAT QA in patient geometries , 2014, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[19]  Benjamin E Nelms,et al.  Per-beam, planar IMRT QA passing rates do not predict clinically relevant patient dose errors. , 2011, Medical physics.

[20]  Geoffrey G. Zhang,et al.  Cross-validation of two commercial methods for volumetric high-resolution dose reconstruction on a phantom for non-coplanar VMAT beams. , 2014, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[21]  Fujio Araki,et al.  Validation of a quick three-dimensional dose verification system for pre-treatment IMRT QA , 2014, Radiological Physics and Technology.

[22]  Vladimir Feygelman,et al.  Evaluation of a biplanar diode array dosimeter for quality assurance of step‐and‐shoot IMRT , 2009, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[23]  Quantitative evaluation of 3D dosimetry for stereotactic volumetric‐modulated arc delivery using COMPASS , 2014, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[24]  Jin Ho Kim,et al.  The sensitivity of gamma-index method to the positioning errors of high-definition MLC in patient-specific VMAT QA for SBRT , 2014, Radiation oncology.

[25]  Gorgen Nilsson,et al.  Characterization and clinical evaluation of a novel IMRT quality assurance system , 2009, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[26]  Prabakar Sukumar,et al.  A study on the correlation between plan complexity and gamma index analysis in patient specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy. , 2015, Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology.