A New Consensus Model for Group Decision Making Problems With Non-Homogeneous Experts

In the literature, we find that the consensus models proposed for group decision making problems are guided by consensus degrees and/or similarity measures and/or consistency measures . When we work in heterogeneous group decision making frameworks, we have importance degrees associated with the experts by expressing their different knowledge levels on the problem. Usually, the importance degrees are applied in the weighted aggregation operators developed to solve the decision situations. In this paper, we study another application possibility, i.e., to use heterogeneity existing among experts to guide the consensus model. Thus, the main goal of this paper is to present a new consensus model for heterogeneous group decision making problems guided also by the heterogeneity criterion. It is also based on consensus degrees and similarity measures, but it presents a new feedback mechanism that adjusts the amount of advice required by each expert depending on his/her own relevance or importance level.

[1]  Luis Martínez-López,et al.  An Adaptive Consensus Support Model for Group Decision-Making Problems in a Multigranular Fuzzy Linguistic Context , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[2]  Anthony N. S. Freeling Fuzzy Sets and Decision Analysis , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[3]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures , 2002, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[4]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  Analyzing consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making: advantages and drawbacks , 2010, Soft Comput..

[5]  Vicenç Torra,et al.  On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems.

[6]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Some induced ordered weighted averaging operators and their use for solving group decision-making problems based on fuzzy preference relations , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  A Mobile Decision Support System for Dynamic Group Decision-Making Problems , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[8]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  A Consensus Model for Group Decision Making Problems with Unbalanced Fuzzy Linguistic Information , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[9]  Ronald R. Yager,et al.  Weighted Maximum Entropy OWA Aggregation With Applications to Decision Making Under Risk , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[10]  J. Kacprzyk,et al.  Multiperson decision making models using fuzzy sets and possibility theory , 1990 .

[11]  Kaoru Hirota,et al.  Fuzzy Algorithm for Group Decision Making With Participants Having Finite Discriminating Abilities , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[12]  J. Kacprzyk Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority , 1986 .

[13]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Intuitionistic Fuzzy Bonferroni Means , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[14]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Cardinal Consistency of Reciprocal Preference Relations: A Characterization of Multiplicative Transitivity , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[15]  David Ben-Arieh,et al.  Minimum Cost Consensus With Quadratic Cost Functions , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.