Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of High Frame Rate Videos

High frame rate (HFR) videos are becoming increasingly common with the tremendous popularity of live, high-action streaming content such as sports. Although HFR contents are generally of very high quality, high bandwidth requirements make them challenging to deliver efficiently, while simultaneously maintaining their quality. To optimize trade-offs between bandwidth requirements and video quality, in terms of frame rate adaptation, it is imperative to understand the intricate relationship between frame rate and perceptual video quality. Towards advancing progression in this direction we designed a new subjective resource, called the LIVE-YouTube-HFR (LIVE-YT-HFR) dataset, which is comprised of 480 videos having 6 different frame rates, obtained from 16 diverse contents. In order to understand the combined effects of compression and frame rate adjustment, we also processed videos at 5 compression levels at each frame rate. To obtain subjective labels on the videos, we conducted a human study yielding 19,000 human quality ratings obtained from a pool of 85 human subjects. We also conducted a holistic evaluation of existing state-of-the-art Full and No-Reference video quality algorithms, and statistically benchmarked their performance on the new database. The LIVE-YT-HFR database has been made available online for public use and evaluation purposes, with hopes that it will help advance research in this exciting video technology direction. It may be obtained at https://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/LIVE_YT_HFR/LIVE_YT_HFR/index.html.

[1]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Structural Similarity Metric for Video Based on Motion Models , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - ICASSP '07.

[2]  Fan Zhang,et al.  A frame rate dependent video quality metric based on temporal wavelet decomposition and spatiotemporal pooling , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[3]  David Bull,et al.  A Study of High Frame Rate Video Formats , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[4]  Praful Gupta,et al.  SpEED-QA: Spatial Efficient Entropic Differencing for Image and Video Quality , 2017, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[5]  Zhi Li,et al.  Recover Subjective Quality Scores from Noisy Measurements , 2016, 2017 Data Compression Conference (DCC).

[6]  Ming Jiang,et al.  Quality Assessment of In-the-Wild Videos , 2019, ACM Multimedia.

[7]  Xuelong Li,et al.  Spatiotemporal Statistics for Video Quality Assessment , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[8]  Zhengfang Duanmu,et al.  Temporal Motion Smoothness and the Impact of Frame Rate Variation on Video Quality , 2018, 2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[9]  Ming Jiang,et al.  Quality Assessment of In-the-Wild Videos , 2019, ACM Multimedia.

[10]  Florent Dupont,et al.  Visual Quality of 3D Meshes With Diffuse Colors in Virtual Reality: Subjective and Objective Evaluation , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[11]  Rabab Kreidieh Ward,et al.  Optimizing a Tone Curve for Backward-Compatible High Dynamic Range Image and Video Compression , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Image Quality Assessment by Separately Evaluating Detail Losses and Additive Impairments , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[13]  Jinwoo Kim,et al.  Deep Video Quality Assessor: From Spatio-Temporal Visual Sensitivity to a Convolutional Neural Aggregation Network , 2018, ECCV.

[14]  Rajiv Soundararajan,et al.  Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Video , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  Fan Zhang,et al.  A study of subjective video quality at various frame rates , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[16]  Alan Conrad Bovik,et al.  Large-Scale Study of Perceptual Video Quality , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Dietmar Saupe,et al.  The Konstanz natural video database (KoNViD-1k) , 2017, 2017 Ninth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[18]  Balu Adsumilli,et al.  YouTube UGC Dataset for Video Compression Research , 2019, 2019 IEEE 21st International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP).

[19]  Chang-Su Kim,et al.  Motion-Compensated Frame Interpolation Using Bilateral Motion Estimation and Adaptive Overlapped Block Motion Compensation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[20]  Margaret H. Pinson,et al.  A new standardized method for objectively measuring video quality , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[21]  Sabine Süsstrunk,et al.  Measuring colorfulness in natural images , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[22]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Capturing Video Frame Rate Variations via Entropic Differencing , 2020, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[23]  Margaret H. Pinson,et al.  The Consumer Digital Video Library , 2010 .

[24]  Shiqi Wang,et al.  Perceptual quality assessment of high frame rate video , 2015, 2015 IEEE 17th International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP).

[25]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[26]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Making a “Completely Blind” Image Quality Analyzer , 2013, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[27]  Margaret H. Pinson,et al.  The Consumer Digital Video Library [Best of the Web] , 2013, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[28]  Sanghoon Lee,et al.  Deep Blind Video Quality Assessment Based on Temporal Human Perception , 2018, 2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[29]  Rajiv Soundararajan,et al.  Video Quality Assessment by Reduced Reference Spatio-Temporal Entropic Differencing , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[30]  Mick Wilson,et al.  Toward QoE-Assured 4K Video-on-Demand Delivery Through Mobile Edge Virtualization With Adaptive Prefetching , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[31]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[32]  Phuoc Tran-Gia,et al.  Best Practices for QoE Crowdtesting: QoE Assessment With Crowdsourcing , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[33]  Damon M. Chandler,et al.  ViS3: an algorithm for video quality assessment via analysis of spatial and spatiotemporal slices , 2014, J. Electronic Imaging.

[34]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Capturing Video Frame Rate Variations through Entropic Differencing , 2020, ArXiv.

[35]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  High Frame Rates and Human Vision: A View through the Window of Visibility , 2013 .

[36]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Motion Tuned Spatio-Temporal Quality Assessment of Natural Videos , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[37]  Ahmet M. Kondoz,et al.  Toward an Impairment Metric for Stereoscopic Video: A Full-Reference Video Quality Metric to Assess Compressed Stereoscopic Video , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[38]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  No-Reference Quality Assessment of Tone-Mapped HDR Pictures , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[39]  David Zhang,et al.  FSIM: A Feature Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[40]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003, The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003.

[41]  Christophe Charrier,et al.  Blind Prediction of Natural Video Quality , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[42]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  No-Reference Image Quality Assessment in the Spatial Domain , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[43]  Eric C. Larson,et al.  Most apparent distortion: full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy , 2010, J. Electronic Imaging.

[44]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Perceptual aliasing factors and the impact of frame rate on video quality , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[45]  Jari Korhonen,et al.  Two-Level Approach for No-Reference Consumer Video Quality Assessment , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[46]  Gustavo de Veciana,et al.  Video Quality Assessment on Mobile Devices: Subjective, Behavioral and Objective Studies , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[47]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Mean squared error: Love it or leave it? A new look at Signal Fidelity Measures , 2009, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[48]  Jean-Bernard Martens,et al.  Quality asessment of coded images using numerical category scaling , 1995, Other Conferences.

[49]  Aljoscha Smolic,et al.  Coding Algorithms for 3DTV—A Survey , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[50]  Xinbo Gao,et al.  Blind Video Quality Assessment With Weakly Supervised Learning and Resampling Strategy , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[51]  Debargha Mukherjee,et al.  A Technical Overview of VP9—The Latest Open-Source Video Codec , 2013 .

[52]  Sugato Chakravarty,et al.  Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures , 1995 .