Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change Fair Trade and Harmonization of Climate Change Policies in Europe

Abstract In March 2000, the European Commission presented a Green Paper on greenhouse gas emissions trading within Europe, supporting implementation of a Community-wide scheme in which the design and regulation of all essential elements would be harmonized at the Community level. The present paper analyzes economic arguments used to justify such a coordinated scenario, showing these arguments to be based on misleading rhetoric about fair trade and harmonization. Diverse allocations of emissions allowances across Member States are justified in theory. In practice, too, no empirical evidence or model-based results demonstrate that an uncoordinated European trading scheme would adversely affect competitiveness to any significant extent or substantially increase industrial relocations.

[1]  P. Portney.  The theory of environmental policy , 1976 .

[2]  Jagdish N. Bhagwati,et al.  Fair trade and harmonization : prerequisites for free trade? , 1996 .

[3]  Thomas F. Rutherford,et al.  Global impacts of the Kyoto agreement: results from the MS-MRT model , 1999 .

[4]  I. Wing,et al.  Toward a useful architecture for climate change negotiations , 1999 .

[5]  H. Jacoby,et al.  Effects of Differentiating Climate Policy by Sector: A U.S. Example , 2000 .

[6]  Helen Wallace,et al.  The Council and the European Parliament , 1997 .

[7]  Edwin Woerdman,et al.  Organizing emissions trading: the barrier of domestic permit allocation , 2000 .

[8]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  The Kyoto Protocol: A Cost-Effective Strategy for Meeting Environmental Objectives? , 1999 .

[9]  J. Bhagwati.  The Demands to Reduce Domestic Diversity Among Trading Nations , 1993 .

[10]  P. Portney,et al.  Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U . S . Manufacturing : What Does the Evidence Tell Us ? , 1999 .

[11]  J. Tobey.  The Effects of Domestic Environmental Policies on Patterns of World Trade: An Empirical Test , 1990 .

[12]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U , 1995 .

[13]  Joaquim Oliveira Martins,et al.  CARBON EMISSION LEAKAGES: A GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM VIEW ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT WORKING PAPERS NO. 242 , 2000 .

[14]  T. Srinivasan,et al.  Trade and the environment , 1996 .

[15]  T. Rutherford,et al.  Carbon Taxes with Exemptions in an Open Economy: A General Equilibrium Analysis of the German Tax Initiative , 1997 .

[16]  M. Cropper,et al.  Environmental Economics: A Survey , 1992 .

[17]  Warwick J. McKibbin,et al.  Emissions trading, capital flows and the Kyoto protocol , 1999 .

[18]  Zhongxiang Zhang.  Should the rule of allocating emissions permits be harmonised , 1999 .

[19]  J. Burniaux,et al.  Carbon Emission Leakages: A General Equilibrium View , 2000 .

[20]  Scott Barrett,et al.  Strategic environmental policy and intrenational trade , 1994 .

[21]  Economic policy and climate change : tradable permits for reducing carbon emissions , 1997 .

[22]  Henry D. Jacoby,et al.  Mit Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change Change Developing Country Effects of Kyoto-type Emissions Restrictions Developing Country Effects of Kyoto-type Emissions Restrictions , 2022 .

[23]  Paul Krugman,et al.  Is Free Trade Passe , 1987 .

[24]  Stephen P. A. Brown,et al.  An economic assessment of the Kyoto Protocol using the Global Trade and Environment Model , 1998 .

[25]  J. Brander,et al.  International R&D Rivalry and Industrial Strategy , 1983 .