Noise Properties of Motion-Compensated Tomographic Image Reconstruction Methods

Motion-compensated image reconstruction (MCIR) methods incorporate motion models to improve image quality in the presence of motion. MCIR methods differ in terms of how they use motion information and they have been well studied separately. However, there have been less theoretical comparisions of different MCIR methods. This paper compares the theoretical noise properties of three popular MCIR methods assuming known nonrigid motion. We show the relationship among three MCIR methods-motion-compensated temporal regularization (MTR), the parametric motion model (PMM), and post-reconstruction motion correction (PMC)-for penalized weighted least square cases. These analyses show that PMM and MTR are matrix-weighted sums of all registered image frames, while PMC is a scalar-weighted sum. We further investigate the noise properties of MCIR methods with Poisson models and quadratic regularizers by deriving accurate and fast variance prediction formulas using an “analytical approach.” These theoretical noise analyses show that the variances of PMM and MTR are lower than or comparable to the variance of PMC due to the statistical weighting. These analyses also facilitate comparisons of the noise properties of different MCIR methods, including the effects of different quadratic regularizers, the influence of the motion through its Jacobian determinant, and the effect of assuming that total activity is preserved. Two-dimensional positron emission tomography simulations demonstrate the theoretical results.

[1]  John W. Clark,et al.  A motion-incorporated reconstruction method for gated PET studies , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  C. J. Ritchie,et al.  Predictive respiratory gating: a new method to reduce motion artifacts on CT scans. , 1994, Radiology.

[3]  Peyman Milanfar,et al.  Statistical performance analysis of super-resolution , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Joint image reconstruction and nonrigid motion estimation with a simple penalty that encourages local invertibility , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[5]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Compensation for nonuniform resolution using penalized-likelihood reconstruction in space-variant imaging systems , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Joint Reconstruction of Image and Motion in Gated Positron Emission Tomography , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Fast Predictions of Variance Images for Fan-Beam Transmission Tomography With Quadratic Regularization , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Xiaodong Tao,et al.  Lesion detectability in motion compensated image reconstruction of respiratory gated PET/CT , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[9]  Manuele Bicego,et al.  Unsupervised scene analysis: a hidden Markov model approach , 2006 .

[10]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  Optical flow based super-resolution: A probabilistic approach , 2007, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[11]  Yongyi Yang,et al.  Tomographic Reconstruction of Dynamic Cardiac Image Sequences , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  C. Ling,et al.  Effect of respiratory gating on quantifying PET images of lung cancer. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Resolution and noise properties of MAP reconstruction for fully 3-D PET , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Wenjia Bai,et al.  Regularized B-spline deformable registration for respiratory motion correction in PET images , 2008 .

[15]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  A Simple Regularizer for B-spline Nonrigid Image Registration That Encourages Local Invertibility , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[16]  Lei Xing,et al.  Model-based image reconstruction for four-dimensional PET. , 2006, Medical physics.

[17]  Elliot K. Fishman,et al.  Image-domain motion compensated time resolved 4D cardiac CT , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[18]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Attenuation correction for a combined 3D PET/CT scanner. , 1998, Medical physics.

[19]  R. Huesman,et al.  Non-rigid summing of gated PET via optical flow , 1996 .

[20]  G El Fakhri,et al.  Nonrigid PET motion compensation in the lower abdomen using simultaneous tagged-MRI and PET imaging. , 2011, Medical physics.

[21]  Fermín S. Viloche Bazán,et al.  Determining the regularization parameters for super-resolution problems , 2008, Signal Process..

[22]  Joceli Mayer,et al.  A Robust and Computationally Efficient Simultaneous Super-Resolution Scheme for Image Sequences , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[23]  W P Segars,et al.  Realistic CT simulation using the 4D XCAT phantom. , 2008, Medical physics.

[24]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Covariance approximation for fast and accurate computation of channelized Hotelling observer statistics , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).

[25]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Quadratic Regularization Design for 2-D CT , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  Yuxiang Xing,et al.  Rapid calculation of detectability in Bayesian single photon emission computed tomography. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  D. Robinson,et al.  Statistical performance analysis of superresolution image reconstruction , 2004, Conference Record of the Thirty-Eighth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2004..

[28]  J. Felblinger,et al.  Generalized MRI reconstruction including elastic physiological motion and coil sensitivity encoding , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  Michael Unser,et al.  B-spline signal processing. I. Theory , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[30]  B. Schölkopf,et al.  Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[31]  J. Fessler,et al.  Joint estimation of image and deformation parameters in motion-corrected PET , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[32]  J.A. Fessler Analytical approach to regularization design for isotropic spatial resolution , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[33]  David R. Gilland,et al.  Estimation of images and nonrigid deformations in gated emission CT , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[34]  Akram Aldroubi,et al.  B-SPLINE SIGNAL PROCESSING: PART I-THEORY , 1993 .

[35]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  Remark on “algorithm 778: L-BFGS-B: Fortran subroutines for large-scale bound constrained optimization” , 2011, TOMS.

[36]  S. R. Searle,et al.  On Deriving the Inverse of a Sum of Matrices , 1981 .

[37]  Xiaoyi Jiang,et al.  Lung motion correction on respiratory gated 3-D PET/CT images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[38]  Kris Thielemans,et al.  Motion compensated image reconstruction of respiratory gated PET/CT , 2006, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006..

[39]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Spatial resolution properties of penalized-likelihood image reconstruction: space-invariant tomographs , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[40]  Michael Elad,et al.  Restoration of a single superresolution image from several blurred, noisy, and undersampled measured images , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[41]  A J Reader,et al.  List-mode-based reconstruction for respiratory motion correction in PET using non-rigid body transformations , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[42]  Ravindra Manjeshwar,et al.  Theoretical Comparison of Motion Correction Techniques for PET Image Reconstruction , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[43]  Jeffrey A. Fessler,et al.  Spatial Resolution Properties of Motion-Compensated Tomographic Image Reconstruction Methods , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[44]  Jeffrey A. Fessler Mean and variance of implicitly defined biased estimators (such as penalized maximum likelihood): applications to tomography , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..