Large-scale deployment of the Global Trigger Tool across a large hospital system: refinements for the characterisation of adverse events to support patient safety learning opportunities

Background The Institute for Healthcare Improvement encourages use of the Global Trigger Tool to objectively determine and monitor adverse events (AEs). Setting Baylor Health Care System (BHCS) is an integrated healthcare delivery system in North Texas. The Global Trigger Tool was applied to BHCS's eight general acute care hospitals, two inpatient cardiovascular hospitals and two rehabilitation/long-term acute care hospitals. Strategy Data were collected from a monthly random sample of charts for each facility for patients discharged between 1 July 2006 and 30 June 2007 by external professional nurse auditors using an MS Access Tool developed for this initiative. In addition to the data elements recommended by Institute for Healthcare Improvement, BHCS developed fields to permit further characterisation of AEs to identify learning opportunities. A structured narrative description of each identified AE facilitated text mining to further characterise AEs. Initial findings Based on this sample, AE rates were found to be 68.1 per 1000 patient days, or 50.8 per 100 encounters, and 39.8% of admissions were found to have ≥1 AE. Of all AEs identified, 61.2% were hospital-acquired, 10.1% of which were associated with a National Coordinating Council – Medical Error Reporting and Prevention harm score of “H or I” (near death or death). Future Direction To enhance learning opportunities and guide quality improvement, BHCS collected data—such as preventability and AE source—to characterise the nature of AEs. Data are provided regularly to hospital teams to direct quality initiatives, moving from a general focus on reducing AEs to more specific programmes based on patterns of harm and preventability.

[1]  David W. Bates,et al.  Research Paper: Using Computerized Data to Identify Adverse Drug Events in Outpatients , 2001, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[2]  Joshua Borus,et al.  Adverse drug events in ambulatory care. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Mohan M. Nadkarni,et al.  Patient safety in the ambulatory setting. A clinician-based approach. , 2004, Journal of general internal medicine.

[4]  J. Loeb,et al.  The JCAHO patient safety event taxonomy: a standardized terminology and classification schema for near misses and adverse events. , 2005, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[5]  A. Donaldson,et al.  Preventable harm occurring to critically ill children* , 2007, Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

[6]  R. Resar,et al.  Adverse drug event trigger tool: a practical methodology for measuring medication related harm , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.

[7]  Janet M. Corrigan,et al.  Priority areas for national action : transforming health care quality , 2003 .

[8]  Rouett H. Abouzelof,et al.  Surveillance of medical device-related hazards and adverse events in hospitalized patients. , 2004, JAMA.

[9]  D. Classen,et al.  Methodology and rationale for the measurement of harm with trigger tools , 2003, Quality & safety in health care.

[10]  B. Erstad,et al.  Direct observation approach for detecting medication errors and adverse drug events in a pediatric intensive care unit* , 2007, Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

[11]  G. Baker,et al.  The development of the Canadian paediatric trigger tool for identifying potential adverse events. , 2005, Healthcare quarterly.

[12]  R S Evans,et al.  Computerized surveillance of adverse drug events in hospital patients* , 1991, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[13]  Paul J Sharek,et al.  Adverse Events in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Development, Testing, and Findings of an NICU-Focused Trigger Tool to Identify Harm in North American NICUs , 2006, Pediatrics.

[14]  R S Evans,et al.  Description of a computerized adverse drug event monitor using a hospital information system. , 1992, Hospital pharmacy.

[15]  H Jick,et al.  Drugs--remarkably nontoxic. , 1974, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  R. Resar,et al.  A trigger tool to identify adverse events in the intensive care unit. , 2006, Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety.

[17]  M M Cohen,et al.  Medication safety program reduces adverse drug events in a community hospital , 2005, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[18]  D. Berwick About the Institute for Healthcare Improvement , 1993 .