District heating and energy efficiency in detached houses of differing size and construction

House envelope measures and conversion of heating systems can reduce primary energy use and CO2 emission in the existing Swedish building stock. We analysed how the size and construction of electrically heated detached houses affect the potential for such measures and the potential for cogenerated district heating. Our starting point was two typical houses built in the 1970s. We altered the floor plans to obtain 6 houses, with heated floor space ranging between 100 and 306Â m2. One of the houses was also analysed for three energy standards with differing heat loss rates. CO2 emission, primary energy use and heating cost were estimated after implementing house envelope measures, conversions to other heating systems and changes in the generation of district heat and electricity. The study accounted for primary energy, including energy chains from natural resources to useful heat in the houses. We showed that conversion to district heating based on biomass, together with house envelope measures, reduced the primary energy use by 88% and the CO2 emission by 96%, while reducing the annual societal cost by 7%. The choice of end-use heating system was decisive for the primary energy use, with district heating being the most efficient. Neither house size nor energy standard did significantly change the ranking of the heating systems, either from a primary energy or an economic viewpoint, but did affect the extent of the annual cost reduction after implementing the measures.

[1]  Lars J Nilsson,et al.  Bioenergy policy and market development in Finland and Sweden , 2004 .

[2]  Åsa Karlsson Comparative Assessment of Fuel-Based Systems for Space Heating , 2003 .

[3]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Life-cycle assessment as a decision-support tool—the case of recycling versus incineration of paper , 1998 .

[4]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  An Environmentally Benign Energy Future for Western Scania, Sweden , 1992 .

[5]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  CO2 mitigation cost: Bioenergy systems and natural gas systems with decarbonization , 1998 .

[6]  John Holmberg,et al.  Energy efficiency--a forgotten goal in the Swedish building sector? , 2005 .

[7]  Tomas Ekvall,et al.  HEATSPOT—a simulation tool for national district heating analyses , 2006 .

[8]  K. Stȧhl,et al.  IGCC power plant for biomass utilisation, Värnamo, Sweden , 1997 .

[9]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Heating Detached Houses in Urban Areas , 2003 .

[10]  G. Finnveden,et al.  Nord 1995:20: Nordic guidelines on life-cycle assessment , 1995 .

[11]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  CO2 mitigation costs of large-scale bioenergy technologies in competitive electricity markets , 2003 .

[12]  Per Levin,et al.  Energy and environmental consequences of an additional wall insulation of a dwelling , 1997 .

[13]  Poul Erik Grohnheit,et al.  Competition in the market for space heating. District heating as the infrastructure for competition among fuels and technologies , 2003 .

[14]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  CO2 mitigation cost: A System Perspective on the Heating of Detached Houses , 2002 .

[15]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Energy conservation and conversion of electrical heating systems in detached houses , 2007 .

[16]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  CO2 Mitigation: On Methods and Parameters for Comparison of Fossil-Fuel and Biofuel Systems , 2006 .