Assessment of surgical skills using Surgical Processes and Dynamic Time Warping

Toward the creation of new computer-assisted intervention systems, Surgical Process Models (SPMs) is an emerging concept used for analyzing and assessing surgical interventions. SPMs represent Surgical Process (SPs) which are formalized as symbolic structured descriptions of surgical interventions, using a pre-defined level of granularity and a dedicated terminology. In this context, an important challenge is the creation of new metrics for the comparison and the evaluation of SPs. Thus, correlations between these metrics and pre-operative data allow to classify surgeries and highlight specific information on the surgery itself and on the surgeon, such as his/her level of expertise. In this paper, we explore the automatic classification of a set of SPs based on the Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) algorithm. DTW allows to compute a distance between two SPs that focuses on the different types of activities performed during surgery and their sequencing, by minimizing time differences. Indeed, it turns out to be a complementary approach to classical methods focusing on the time and the number of activities differences only. Experiments were carried out on 24 lumbar disc herniation surgeries to discriminate the level of expertise of surgeons according to prior classification of SPs. Unsupervised classification experiments have shown that this approach was able to automatically identify groups of surgeons according to their level of expertise (senior and junior), and opens many perspectives for the creation of new metrics for surgeries comparison and evaluation.

[1]  Gero Strauß,et al.  Research Paper: Validation of Knowledge Acquisition for Surgical Process Models , 2009, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[2]  L. MacKenzie,et al.  Hierarchical decomposition of laparoscopic surgery: a human factors approach to investigating the operating room environment , 2001, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[3]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  The Intuitive/sup TM/ telesurgery system: overview and application , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[4]  T. Neumuth,et al.  Recording of Surgical Processes: A Study Comparing Senior and Junior Neurosurgeons During Lumbar Disc Herniation Surgery , 2010, Neurosurgery.

[5]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Statistical modeling and recognition of surgical workflow , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[6]  Thomas Neumuth,et al.  Analysis of surgical intervention populations using generic surgical process models , 2010, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[7]  J Dankelman,et al.  Systems for tracking minimally invasive surgical instruments , 2007, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[8]  Gero Strauß,et al.  Acquisition of Process Descriptions from Surgical Interventions , 2006, DEXA.

[9]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Markov modeling of minimally invasive surgery based on tool/tissue interaction and force/torque signatures for evaluating surgical skills , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  A. Darzi,et al.  Objective assessment of technical skills in surgery , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  R. Reznick,et al.  Testing technical skill via an innovative "bench station" examination. , 1997, American journal of surgery.

[12]  Henry C. Lin,et al.  Review of methods for objective surgical skill evaluation , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[13]  Anil K. Jain Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means , 2008, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[14]  S. Chiba,et al.  Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition , 1978 .

[15]  Jones Mark,et al.  Surgeon specific mortality in adult cardiac surgery: comparison between crude and risk stratified data , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[16]  T. Neumuth,et al.  Structured recording of intraoperative surgical workflows , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[17]  Activité ad‐hoc Types de tâches Introduction to BPMN , 2004 .

[18]  A. Darzi,et al.  The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[19]  W. J. Howe Organizational Management in Workflow Applications – Issues and Perspectives , 2003 .

[20]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  An introduction to the bootstrap , 1993 .

[21]  P. Jannin,et al.  Model of Surgical Procedures for Multimodal Image-Guided Neurosurgery , 2003, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[22]  J. Doyle,et al.  A universal global rating scale for the evaluation of technical skills in the operating room. , 2007, American journal of surgery.

[23]  Pierre Gançarski,et al.  A global averaging method for dynamic time warping, with applications to clustering , 2011, Pattern Recognit..

[24]  Alfred Cuschieri,et al.  The performance of master surgeons on the Advanced Dundee Endoscopic Psychomotor Tester: contrast validity study. , 2002, Archives of surgery.