Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities.

This article describes issues concerning music perception with cochlear implants, discusses why music perception is usually poor in cochlear implant users, reviews relevant data, and describes approaches for improving music perception with cochlear implants. Pitch discrimination ability ranges from the ability to hear a one-semitone difference to a two-octave difference. The ability to hear rhythm and tone duration is near normal in implantees. Timbre perception is usually poor, but about two-thirds of listeners can identify instruments in a closed set better than chance. Cochlear implant recipients typically have poor melody perception but are aided with rhythm and lyrics. Without rhythm or lyrics, only about one-third of implantees can identify common melodies in a closed set better than chance. Correlations have been found between music perception ability and speech understanding in noisy environments. Thus, improving music perception might also provide broader clinical benefit. A number of approaches have been proposed to improve music perception with implant users, including encoding fundamental frequency with modulation, "current-steering," MP3-like processing, and nerve "conditioning." If successful, these approaches could improve the quality of life for implantees by improving communication and musical and environmental awareness.

[1]  Mark Downing,et al.  Current Steering Creates Additional Pitch Percepts in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients , 2007, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[2]  R J Glynn,et al.  Survival of Spiral Ganglion Cells in Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Implications for Cochlear Implantation , 1989, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[3]  F B Simmons,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. , 1966, Archives of otolaryngology.

[4]  N. Cohen,et al.  Cochlear Implants , 2000 .

[5]  M. Leek,et al.  Auditory temporal resolution in birds: discrimination of harmonic complexes. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  S. Gelfand,et al.  Adult-onset auditory deprivation. , 1992, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[7]  R. Shannon Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics , 1983, Hearing Research.

[8]  Susan B. Waltzman,et al.  4 Sound Processors in Cochlear Implants , 2006 .

[9]  Mark Downing,et al.  Using Current Steering to Increase Spectral Resolution in CII and HiRes 90K Users , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[10]  D. M. Green,et al.  The perception of pitch. , 1974, American scientist.

[11]  Jay T. Rubinstein,et al.  Clinical Assessment of Music Perception in Cochlear Implant Listeners , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[12]  R V Shannon,et al.  Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[13]  J. Knutson,et al.  Effects of Frequency, Instrumental Family, and Cochlear Implant Type on Timbre Recognition and Appraisal , 2002, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[14]  F. Zeng Trends in Cochlear Implants , 2004, Trends in amplification.

[15]  Bertrand Delgutte,et al.  Improved temporal coding of sinusoids in electric stimulation of the auditory nerve using desynchronizing pulse trains. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  Belinda A Henry,et al.  Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Philipos C. Loizou,et al.  Mimicking the human ear , 1998, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[18]  M. Liberman,et al.  Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Single-Fiber Recording , 2004 .

[20]  A. Seebeck,et al.  Beobachtungen über einige Bedingungen der Entstehung von Tönen , 1841 .

[21]  Zachary M. Smith,et al.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception , 2002, Nature.

[22]  Jong Ho Won,et al.  Spectral-Ripple Resolution Correlates with Speech Reception in Noise in Cochlear Implant Users , 2007, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[23]  Robert V. Shannon,et al.  Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. II. Channel interaction , 1983, Hearing Research.

[24]  S. Waltzman Cochlear Implants: Audiological Foundations R.S. Tyler (Ed.). San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group, Inc. (1993). 411 pp., $49.95. Orders: (800) 521-8545. ISBN 1-879105-81-0. , 1993 .

[25]  Edwin C. Moxon,et al.  Physiological Considerations in Artificial Stimulation of the Inner Ear , 1972, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[26]  Robert S Hong,et al.  Conditioning Pulse Trains in Cochlear Implants: Effects on Loudness Growth , 2006, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[27]  D. H. Johnson,et al.  The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Hugh J. McDermott Music Perception with Cochlear Implants: A Review , 2004, Trends in amplification.

[29]  J. C. Poggendorf Annalen der Physik und Chemie , 1829 .

[30]  Bertrand Delgutte,et al.  Desynchronization of electrically evoked auditory-nerve activity by high-frequency pulse trains of long duration. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  D. Green An introduction to hearing , 1976 .

[32]  R. Shannon,et al.  Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  Qian-Jie Fu,et al.  Melodic Contour Identification by Cochlear Implant Listeners , 2007, Ear and hearing.

[34]  Jay T. Rubinstein,et al.  Discrimination of Schroeder-Phase Harmonic Complexes by Normal-Hearing and Cochlear-Implant Listeners , 2008, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[35]  Bernard Fraysse,et al.  Music Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients , 2003, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[36]  G Woodworth,et al.  Perception of Rhythmic and Sequential Pitch Patterns by Normally Hearing Adults and Adult Cochlear Implant Users , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[37]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Perception of Pitch by People with Cochlear Hearing Loss and by Cochlear Implant Users , 2005 .

[38]  R. Fay,et al.  Pitch : neural coding and perception , 2005 .

[39]  J. Knutson,et al.  Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[40]  H J McDermott,et al.  Musical pitch perception with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  Wightman Fl,et al.  The perception of pitch. , 1974 .

[42]  D W Schwarz,et al.  Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodes. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  L Geurts,et al.  Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[44]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  A Psychoacoustic "NofM"-Type Speech Coding Strategy for Cochlear Implants , 2005, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[45]  P. Stypulkowski,et al.  Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. II. Single fiber recordings , 1984, Hearing Research.

[46]  J. Knutson,et al.  Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults , 2002, Cochlear implants international.

[47]  Robert K Shepherd,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status , 1997, Hearing Research.

[48]  Edwin Charles Moxon,et al.  Neural and mechanical responses to electric stimulation of the cat's inner ear , 1971 .

[49]  Marc Moonen,et al.  Improved Music Perception with Explicit Pitch Coding in Cochlear Implants , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[50]  R A Levine,et al.  Auditory-nerve activity in cats with normal and abnormal cochleas. In: Sensorineural hearing loss. , 1970, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[51]  Shelley Witt,et al.  Recognition of “Real-World” Musical Excerpts by Cochlear Implant Recipients and Normal-Hearing Adults , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[52]  J. Nadol,et al.  Patterns of neural degeneration in the human cochlea and auditory nerve: implications for cochlear implantation. , 1997, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[53]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Music Perception with Temporal Cues in Acoustic and Electric Hearing , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[54]  Dirk Van Compernolle,et al.  Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[55]  William M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants , 1991, Nature.

[56]  D J Van Tasell,et al.  Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[57]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[58]  M. Dorman,et al.  Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[59]  Bruce J. Gantz,et al.  Acoustic plus Electric Speech Processing: Preliminary Results of a Multicenter Clinical Trial of the Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid Implant , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.

[60]  G M Clark,et al.  Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant patients. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[61]  J. Nadol,et al.  Diameter of the Cochlear Nerve in Deaf Humans: Implications for Cochlear Implantation , 1992, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[62]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Cochlear Implants: Auditory Prostheses and Electric Hearing , 2004, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research.

[63]  Colette M. McKay,et al.  Psychophysics and Electrical Stimulation , 2004 .

[64]  M. Charles Liberman,et al.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. II. Stereocilia damage and alterations of spontaneous discharge rates , 1984, Hearing Research.

[65]  Robert B. Ash,et al.  Information Theory , 2020, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[66]  J S Reilly,et al.  Sensorineural hearing loss. , 1989, The Pediatric clinics of North America.

[67]  J. Flavell Metacognitive aspects of problem solving , 1976 .

[68]  H J McDermott,et al.  Pitch percepts associated with amplitude-modulated current pulse trains in cochlear implantees. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[69]  J. T Rubinstein,et al.  Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation , 1999, Hearing Research.

[70]  S. Handel,et al.  Chapter 12 – Timbre Perception and Auditory Object Identification , 1995 .

[71]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[72]  Robert S Hong,et al.  High-rate conditioning pulse trains in cochlear implants: dynamic range measures with sinusoidal stimuli. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[73]  A. Kaider,et al.  The Role of Intensity Upon Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implant Recipients , 2006, The Laryngoscope.

[74]  Bertrand Delgutte,et al.  Improved neural representation of vowels in electric stimulation using desynchronizing pulse trains. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.